OP Token Crashes to Record Low as Price Moves Below $0.13

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-20

Introduzione

OP Token (OP) has crashed to a record low, falling over 9% in 24 hours to trade near $0.13 and hitting an all-time low of $0.1271. This represents a decline of over 97% from its all-time high of $4.85. Traders faced $2.23 million in liquidations, predominantly from long positions. Despite the price drop, open interest surged 25.34%, indicating high market activity. The decline is partly attributed to Base, a Layer 2 chain, moving away from the OP Stack, which weakens Optimism's Superchain vision. Technical analysis shows OP is deeply oversold with an RSI between 21-29, suggesting potential for a short-term bounce, but the MACD remains bearish. Key support is at $0.125, with resistance at $0.14.

Optimism Token (OP) has fallen more than 9% in the last 24 hours, now trading at nearly $0.13. With that, on February 20, it even hit an all-time low of $0.1271. This is a huge fall from its all-time high of $4.85 in March 2024, which is over 97% down.

According to the Coinglass derivatives data, Optimism traders faced $2.23 million in liquidation, with most of that coming from long positions, means who had bet the price would go up around $1.98 million in the last 24 hours. While the open interest data varies, which shows how many active trades are open, went up 25.34% in one day, showing the market is still very active.

With that, on February 18, Layer 2 chain, Base introduced a single unified stack called for accelerating upgrades and additional security, and it was planned to make public and open for contribution, as it is moving away from the OP Stack, but it assures that it would remain compatible with OP Stack standards.

As this shift from Base, which indicates a fundamental weakening of the Optimism’s Superchain vision, which is a grand idea to unite multiple Layer-2 chains under shared governance, shared security, unified governnace and revenue-sharing agreements.

OP Price Analysis

Optimism Token (OP) continues to trade near $0.13, after previously reaching around $1.40. The 24-hour trading volume has risen by approximately 7.79%, standing at $224.19 million, showing continued market activity despite the token’s decline.

With that, the immediate support for OP token lies at $0.125; if it breaks below, the OP token could fall deeper toward $0.110 – $0.100. On the reversal, the immediate resistance is seen at $0. 14, when the token breaks above this, the token could touch $0.16.

Analyzing through technical indicators, RSI is standing around the 21-29 range, which is a deeply oversold condition, which shows a chance for a short-term bounce, but if a token shows strong downtrends, it could stay below for longer periods, too. Also, the OP’s Moving Average Convergence and Divergence line is below zero, which indicates a clear bearish signal.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Bloomberg Intelligence Analyst Mike McGlone Has Revised BTC Price Prediction, but a Broader Concern Remains

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the current trading price of Optimism Token (OP) and how much has it fallen in the last 24 hours?

AThe Optimism Token (OP) is currently trading at nearly $0.13, having fallen more than 9% in the last 24 hours.

QWhat was the all-time low price for OP and when was it hit?

AOP hit an all-time low of $0.1271 on February 20.

QHow much did Optimism traders face in liquidations, and what type of positions made up the majority of these losses?

AOptimism traders faced $2.23 million in liquidations, with the majority (around $1.98 million) coming from long positions.

QWhat technical indicator suggests OP is in a deeply oversold condition, and what does this indicate?

AThe RSI (Relative Strength Index) is standing around the 21-29 range, which indicates a deeply oversold condition and suggests a chance for a short-term bounce.

QWhat recent development from Base indicates a potential weakening of Optimism's Superchain vision?

ABase introduced a new unified stack, moving away from the OP Stack, which indicates a fundamental weakening of Optimism’s Superchain vision of uniting multiple Layer-2 chains.

Letture associate

The Gold Buy-on-the-Dip Guide: Watch Interest Rates, Not Just War

"Gold Buying Guide: Focus on Interest Rates, Not Just War" Four months ago, gold buyers likely didn't anticipate buying at a peak that even a war couldn't sustain. After hitting a record high of $5,596 on January 29, gold entered a bear market just 91 days later, its fastest decline since 2008. A key trigger was the Fed's hawkish shift, highlighting that monetary policy, not geopolitics, is the primary driver. The article argues that the traditional "buy gold in turmoil" script has changed. While the US-Iran conflict initially boosted prices, the sustained rally in oil prices heightened inflation fears, forcing central banks to maintain or consider tighter policy. Since gold yields no interest, higher rates increase its opportunity cost, eroding its appeal. This dynamic was evident when gold fell sharply on May 18 despite positive peace talks, as lower oil prices eased inflation and thus rate hike pressures. The recent sell-off is also part of a broader market deleveraging. Correlations between gold, Nasdaq, and Bitcoin spiked as leveraged investors sold liquid assets to cover losses, creating a synchronized downturn. Historically, gold bottoms align with policy shifts, not conflict resolutions. The 2008 and 2022 bear markets ended with shifts to extreme easing and peak inflation expectations, respectively. For potential buyers, the author suggests monitoring three signals: 1) Peak interest rate hike expectations, 2) Reopening of the Strait of Hormuz (to ease oil/inflation pressure), and 3) A return to net inflows for Gold ETFs, indicating the end of forced selling. While predicting the exact bottom is impossible, the author's personal strategy involves scaling into a position across price levels like $4000, $3700, and $3500, committing no more than 30% of the intended total allocation initially, and adding the remainder only if key signals emerge. The core conclusion: In turbulent times, watching interest rates is more crucial than watching wars.

marsbit7 min fa

The Gold Buy-on-the-Dip Guide: Watch Interest Rates, Not Just War

marsbit7 min fa

Recent On-Chain Review: No Clear Narrative Under U.S. Stock Market Pressure, Just Hype

This article analyzes the current state of the Solana meme coin and community token ecosystem, highlighting a market caught between two dominant forces: attention-based PvP and a gradual return to community-centric projects. The first part explores the "Attention PvP" dynamic, where success is driven by celebrity endorsements, viral events, and speed. Examples include $JOTCHUA, which surged after its meme creator's social media activity, and $WORLDCUP, which outperformed a similar Base chain project ($PITCH) largely due to influencer support. The recent "pump.fun GO" feature, allowing bounty tasks for token promotion, is critiqued for fostering sensationalist and often negative stunts—like people getting token tickers tattooed on their bodies for rewards—reminiscent of old internet shock content. In contrast, the article points to a resurgence of organic, community-driven tokens that survive market volatility through strong holder bases and shared ideology, not just hype. Influencer Ansem is cited, arguing that durable meme coins rely on communities willing to endure losses and promote their core message daily. Examples given are older tokens like $neet (anti-work ethos), $troll, $buttcoin, and $triplet, which have maintained relative price stability. A prime example of this community-build model is the new project $KINS, the token for the browser-based MMORPG Kintara. Its success stems not from advanced graphics but from consistently delivering updates, fostering player trust, and creating genuine engagement (e.g., in-game economies, events, property auctions). It has attracted a growing player base and even notable KOLs as participants, demonstrating that sustainable growth can come from building trust rather than orchestrating pumps. The article concludes by questioning whether the market is ultimately a game of mutual trust or mutual deception, expressing hope that such reflection might lead to a healthier ecosystem.

marsbit7 min fa

Recent On-Chain Review: No Clear Narrative Under U.S. Stock Market Pressure, Just Hype

marsbit7 min fa

Teen Accused Of $13M Crypto Scam That Funded Miami Luxury

A Canadian teenager, Trenton Richard David Johnston, is accused of running a cryptocurrency fraud scheme from the Miami area, allegedly causing over $13 million in losses. The 19-year-old and unnamed co-conspirators are charged with posing as support representatives from a major search engine and crypto companies to gain access to victims' digital accounts and crypto wallets. He was indicted on charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering. Prosecutors allege that Johnston, along with co-defendant Brandon Michael Tardibone, laundered more than $1 million of the illicit funds to finance luxury vehicles, high-end jewelry, and an extravagant nightlife. Tardibone is additionally charged with harboring Johnston, who had overstayed his visa. Both defendants face up to 20 years in prison if convicted. The case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida.

bitcoinist11 min fa

Teen Accused Of $13M Crypto Scam That Funded Miami Luxury

bitcoinist11 min fa

On-Chain Scene on Opening Day: $20 Billion Already Staked, How Do On-Chain Contracts Know Who Wins?

On the opening day of the 2026 World Cup, over $2 billion had already been wagered on just the "tournament winner" contracts on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi. This article explores how these blockchain-based prediction markets actually function once the games begin. It breaks down the massive volume and explains how single-game and tournament-long contracts are priced, with values moving between 1-99 cents to reflect implied probabilities. A key mechanism highlighted is "elimination zeroing," where a team's "champion yes" contract immediately settles to zero once they are mathematically eliminated. The core technical question answered is: how does a smart contract "know" who won a real-world match? The answer lies in oracles. The article details two primary paradigms: UMA's "optimistic oracle" (used by most of Polymarket), which allows a challenge period after a proposed result, and Chainlink's multi-source data aggregation (used by FIFA partners like ADI Predictstreet), which automates settlement with minimal dispute windows. Finally, the article injects a note of caution, citing research estimating that a significant portion of historical trading volume on these platforms might be "wash trading" to inflate numbers. It concludes by contrasting the legal status of these "event contracts" under CFTC rules in the U.S. versus traditional, state-regulated sports betting. As the tournament progresses, the real-time operation of this multi-billion dollar machine—its settlements, eliminations, and underlying mechanisms—becomes a story as compelling as the football itself.

marsbit22 min fa

On-Chain Scene on Opening Day: $20 Billion Already Staked, How Do On-Chain Contracts Know Who Wins?

marsbit22 min fa

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit1 h fa

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures