Online vs. Offline CBDCs — The Privacy Battle Dividing the EU

ccn.comPubblicato 2025-12-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-25

Introduzione

The EU is divided over the design of its proposed digital euro, with a key conflict emerging between online and offline functionality. The Council of the EU supports a hybrid model that includes both online and offline capabilities. In contrast, privacy-focused members of the European Parliament advocate for an offline-only version, arguing it offers stronger, cash-like privacy by enabling peer-to-peer transactions without centralized tracking. They warn that an online system could allow excessive surveillance of consumer spending. The European Central Bank and European Commission favor the hybrid approach but face opposition from data protection authorities concerned about data minimization. With negotiations set for 2026, the outcome will determine the balance between privacy and functionality in the EU's digital currency.

Key Takeaways

The Council of the EU has adopted a digital euro negotiating position that favors online and offline functionality.
However, privacy hawks in the European Parliament are pushing for an offline-only digital currency.
As the two sides prepare for negotiations in 2026, privacy has emerged as the key battle line.

As the EU’s digital euro inches closer to realization, policymakers are split between two camps with competing visions for the central bank digital currency.

In one model, offline CBDCs behave like digital cash, with strong privacy built in by design.

However, another, more ambitious approach envisions the digital euro as a comprehensive online payment instrument that offers the same functionality as cards and digital wallets.

New Trending Crypto Wallet Offers

Tangem

promotions

Trusted & Secure

Coins

Claim Offer

BitBox

promotions

Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly

Coins

–

Claim Offer

Blockstream

promotions

Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly

Coins

–

Claim Offer

The Two Digital Euros: Online Accounts vs. Offline Tokens

The distinction between online and offline versions of the CBDC emerged early on in discussions over the digital euro, with a string of EU policy documents exploring the pros and cons of each model since 2020.

An online digital euro would function like today’s electronic payments, with accounts tied to individual consumers and businesses, and transactions validated through infrastructure operated by banks and other regulated Eurosystem participants.

Meanwhile, offline CBDCs more closely resemble traditional cryptocurrencies, with tokens that move between wallets on a peer-to-peer basis, eliminating the need to update balances on a centralized ledger.

Privacy Hawks Favor Offline-Only CBDC

In the debate over online versus offline digital euros, privacy is a central political constraint.

The European Central Bank (ECB) has repeatedly framed privacy as “by design,” arguing that it wants the digital euro to meet very high privacy standards compared with existing electronic payment rails.

But that prospect holds much more weight with an offline CBDC, which promises a cash-like degree of anonymity, at least for small payments.

Alongside the European Commission, the ECB favors a hybrid system, with larger payments requiring online validation, but some offline functionality for low-value payments.

However, after the Commission outlined a proposal for online and offline functionality in 2023, privacy hawks in the European Parliament pushed back, arguing that online CBDCs could grant centralized authorities unprecedented visibility into consumers’ daily spending.

They argued that the proposal’s privacy guarantees for online CBDCs lacked legal grounding and would require users to simply trust that their payment data wouldn’t be accessed by centralized authorities.

That view is backed by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), which have warned that the systematic logging of online payments risks violating EU data-minimization principles.

Council vs. Parliament

Since 2023, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have increasingly rallied around an offline-first, or even offline-only, digital euro.

But on Dec. 19, the EU Council representing Member States backed a negotiating position that more closely aligns with the European Commission’s 2023 proposal.

Now, the EU’s two decision-making branches are on a collision course.

With negotiations set to take place throughout 2026, the future of the digital euro project rests on whether or not the Council can convince enough MEPs to back online CBDCs.

Critics of online digital euro payments can be found across the political spectrum.

With diverse parliamentary alliances expected to push for strong privacy protections for any online functionality, the Council will likely need to offer legal guarantees that have been absent from the discussion so far.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the two competing models for the digital euro being debated in the EU?

AThe two competing models are an online digital euro, which functions like electronic payments with accounts tied to individuals and validated through bank infrastructure, and an offline digital euro, which operates like digital cash with peer-to-peer transactions and no need for a centralized ledger.

QWhy do privacy advocates in the European Parliament favor an offline-only digital euro?

APrivacy advocates favor an offline-only digital euro because it offers cash-like anonymity for transactions, especially for small payments, and prevents centralized authorities from having unprecedented visibility into consumers' daily spending, which they argue is a risk with online CBDCs.

QWhat is the position of the EU Council regarding the digital euro's functionality?

AThe EU Council adopted a negotiating position on December 19 that favors a hybrid system with both online and offline functionality, aligning closely with the European Commission's 2023 proposal.

QWhat concerns have data protection authorities raised about the online digital euro model?

AThe European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) have warned that the systematic logging of online payments risks violating EU data-minimization principles and lacks strong legal grounding for privacy guarantees.

QWhen are negotiations between the EU Council and the European Parliament on the digital euro expected to take place?

ANegotiations between the EU Council and the European Parliament are set to take place throughout 2026 to resolve the differences in their positions on the digital euro's design and functionality.

Letture associate

AMLBot launches AI Tracer for self-service blockchain investigations

AMLBot, a crypto forensics firm, has launched "AI Tracer," a self-service blockchain analysis tool. It automates the tracing of visible fund movements from a starting transaction hash across multiple blockchain networks, following funds through bridges and multiple wallets. The AI matches encountered wallets against known entity labels like exchanges. The tool is designed to simplify investigations for users like journalists, researchers, and law enforcement, removing the need for specialist software or deep expertise. It offers a free check with paid plans for higher usage. However, it cannot track internal exchange transfers, determine payment intent, freeze assets, or guarantee recovery; its reports are an investigative starting point, not a legal replacement. Currently supported networks include Bitcoin, Ethereum, BNB Chain, Solana, Cardano, Ripple, and several others.

cointelegraph50 min fa

AMLBot launches AI Tracer for self-service blockchain investigations

cointelegraph50 min fa

Stocks Fell Even More Violently Than Crypto, Where Did the Money Go?

From June to late July 2026, global stock markets, particularly technology and semiconductor stocks, experienced severe declines, with South Korea's KOSPI index facing historic circuit breakers and shedding 40% from its June peak. Key catalysts included SK Hynix's earnings miss despite record profits and competitive pressures from China's CXMT IPO. A global forced deleveraging event unfolded, devastating highly leveraged instruments like the 2x leveraged SK Hynix ETF, which lost over 80% of its value. Surprisingly, Bitcoin showed relative stability during this period, rising roughly 15% from its July low. The article clarifies this wasn't due to an inflow of equity flight capital but because Bitcoin had already undergone a significant correction in May and June, with U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs seeing record outflows. True safe-haven flows went to gold, severing Bitcoin's short-term "digital gold" narrative. The sell-off is characterized not as an AI story collapse but a liquidity-driven清算 of crowded leveraged positions, potentially halfway through according to some analysts. For substantial capital to return to Bitcoin, the article cites necessary conditions: eased global liquidity pressure, a soft-landing Fed rate cut, and regulatory clarity from the stalled U.S. CLARITY Act. The conclusion is that Bitcoin is not a current safe haven but a pre-cleared asset. Its decoupling from tech stocks highlights its potential future role as a non-correlated asset for institutional portfolios, positioning it favorably for when global capital reallocates post-crisis.

marsbit54 min fa

Stocks Fell Even More Violently Than Crypto, Where Did the Money Go?

marsbit54 min fa

Cryptocurrency Project Backed by 140 Companies, Including Visa and BlackRock, Launched! This Giant Altcoin Was Chosen!

A new generation stablecoin project called Open USD (OUSD), aimed at institutional investors and backed by a consortium of over 140 companies including Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, and BlackRock, is preparing for launch. Initially launching on the Ethereum platform, OUSD is positioned to simplify corporate transactions using digital dollars. The project, led by Open Standard, aims to allow businesses to issue and exchange OUSD without fees or volume limits. A notable feature is its reserve revenue-sharing model, which plans to distribute earnings from OUSD reserves to ecosystem partners after deducting operational management fees, presenting a different approach compared to some existing major stablecoin models. The launch on Ethereum is seen as significant for further solidifying the platform's leading role in institutional finance, particularly for applications involving stablecoins, real-world assets (RWA), and tokenization.

cryptonews.ru57 min fa

Cryptocurrency Project Backed by 140 Companies, Including Visa and BlackRock, Launched! This Giant Altcoin Was Chosen!

cryptonews.ru57 min fa

US Imposes Sanctions on Iranian Crypto Service Hormuz Safe for Bitcoin Payments

The U.S. Department of the Treasury, via OFAC, imposed sanctions on two Iranian companies, Persian Gulf Marine Insurance Company (PGMIC) and Hormuz Safe Marine Services Authority, accusing them of operating a sanctions evasion scheme involving maritime insurance paid for with cryptocurrencies. The action also targeted eight vessels and eight companies allegedly part of Iran's "shadow fleet." OFAC stated that Iranian authorities forced commercial vessels to purchase mandatory insurance for passage through the Strait of Hormuz. The Hormuz Safe platform, launched in May 2026 with involvement from Iran's Ministry of Economy, allowed policy payments in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, which the U.S. claims enabled Iran to generate revenue and circumvent sanctions. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent condemned Iran's attempts to "hold global trade hostage" and fund activities of the IRGC. Furthermore, OFAC sanctioned shipping companies and tankers accused of transporting millions of barrels of Iranian oil to China, the UAE, and other destinations despite international restrictions. All designated assets under U.S. jurisdiction are now blocked, and transactions with them by U.S. persons are prohibited. These sanctions come amid reported diplomatic outreach from the U.S. to Iran, which has so far gone unanswered by the IRGC.

cryptonews.ru59 min fa

US Imposes Sanctions on Iranian Crypto Service Hormuz Safe for Bitcoin Payments

cryptonews.ru59 min fa

"The Final Phase Before the New Cycle". What Will Happen to Bitcoin in August

"Bitcoin Faces Crucial Test in August: Experts Predict Consolidation or Further Decline" The price of Bitcoin (BTC) is expected to remain under pressure in August, with experts anticipating either consolidation within a narrow range or a potential drop below $60,000. Despite a double-digit recovery from its July low near $58,000, BTC ended the month trading around $63,500, still roughly 50% below its October 2025 peak of $126,200. Analysts cite several headwinds: a challenging macroeconomic environment with high US interest rates and persistent inflation, which makes fixed-income assets more attractive than speculative ones like crypto. Furthermore, competition for capital is intense, with many investors favoring AI-related stocks. This is reflected in significant outflows from US spot Bitcoin ETFs, with a record $4.5 billion leaving in June and a net outflow of $5.4 billion for the first half of the year. Historically, August is a weak month for crypto, with a median return of -7.49% from 2013 to 2025. Experts also note regulatory uncertainty in the US, particularly the stalled CLARITY Act, as a dampening factor. Despite the bearish near-term outlook, several experts view the current phase as the "last phase before a new Bitcoin cycle" begins, potentially in Q4 2024. This makes it a favorable time for accumulating Bitcoin for the long term. Key price levels to watch are support at $60,000-$61,000, with a break below $58,000 potentially leading to $53,000-$55,000. A move above $67,000 could target $70,000-$75,000, though this is considered a lower probability scenario.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

"The Final Phase Before the New Cycle". What Will Happen to Bitcoin in August

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Trading

Spot