Online vs. Offline CBDCs — The Privacy Battle Dividing the EU

ccn.comPubblicato 2025-12-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-25

Introduzione

The EU is divided over the design of its proposed digital euro, with a key conflict emerging between online and offline functionality. The Council of the EU supports a hybrid model that includes both online and offline capabilities. In contrast, privacy-focused members of the European Parliament advocate for an offline-only version, arguing it offers stronger, cash-like privacy by enabling peer-to-peer transactions without centralized tracking. They warn that an online system could allow excessive surveillance of consumer spending. The European Central Bank and European Commission favor the hybrid approach but face opposition from data protection authorities concerned about data minimization. With negotiations set for 2026, the outcome will determine the balance between privacy and functionality in the EU's digital currency.

Key Takeaways

The Council of the EU has adopted a digital euro negotiating position that favors online and offline functionality.
However, privacy hawks in the European Parliament are pushing for an offline-only digital currency.
As the two sides prepare for negotiations in 2026, privacy has emerged as the key battle line.

As the EU’s digital euro inches closer to realization, policymakers are split between two camps with competing visions for the central bank digital currency.

In one model, offline CBDCs behave like digital cash, with strong privacy built in by design.

However, another, more ambitious approach envisions the digital euro as a comprehensive online payment instrument that offers the same functionality as cards and digital wallets.

New Trending Crypto Wallet Offers

Tangem

promotions

Trusted & Secure

Coins

Claim Offer

BitBox

promotions

Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly

Coins

–

Claim Offer

Blockstream

promotions

Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly

Coins

–

Claim Offer

The Two Digital Euros: Online Accounts vs. Offline Tokens

The distinction between online and offline versions of the CBDC emerged early on in discussions over the digital euro, with a string of EU policy documents exploring the pros and cons of each model since 2020.

An online digital euro would function like today’s electronic payments, with accounts tied to individual consumers and businesses, and transactions validated through infrastructure operated by banks and other regulated Eurosystem participants.

Meanwhile, offline CBDCs more closely resemble traditional cryptocurrencies, with tokens that move between wallets on a peer-to-peer basis, eliminating the need to update balances on a centralized ledger.

Privacy Hawks Favor Offline-Only CBDC

In the debate over online versus offline digital euros, privacy is a central political constraint.

The European Central Bank (ECB) has repeatedly framed privacy as “by design,” arguing that it wants the digital euro to meet very high privacy standards compared with existing electronic payment rails.

But that prospect holds much more weight with an offline CBDC, which promises a cash-like degree of anonymity, at least for small payments.

Alongside the European Commission, the ECB favors a hybrid system, with larger payments requiring online validation, but some offline functionality for low-value payments.

However, after the Commission outlined a proposal for online and offline functionality in 2023, privacy hawks in the European Parliament pushed back, arguing that online CBDCs could grant centralized authorities unprecedented visibility into consumers’ daily spending.

They argued that the proposal’s privacy guarantees for online CBDCs lacked legal grounding and would require users to simply trust that their payment data wouldn’t be accessed by centralized authorities.

That view is backed by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), which have warned that the systematic logging of online payments risks violating EU data-minimization principles.

Council vs. Parliament

Since 2023, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have increasingly rallied around an offline-first, or even offline-only, digital euro.

But on Dec. 19, the EU Council representing Member States backed a negotiating position that more closely aligns with the European Commission’s 2023 proposal.

Now, the EU’s two decision-making branches are on a collision course.

With negotiations set to take place throughout 2026, the future of the digital euro project rests on whether or not the Council can convince enough MEPs to back online CBDCs.

Critics of online digital euro payments can be found across the political spectrum.

With diverse parliamentary alliances expected to push for strong privacy protections for any online functionality, the Council will likely need to offer legal guarantees that have been absent from the discussion so far.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the two competing models for the digital euro being debated in the EU?

AThe two competing models are an online digital euro, which functions like electronic payments with accounts tied to individuals and validated through bank infrastructure, and an offline digital euro, which operates like digital cash with peer-to-peer transactions and no need for a centralized ledger.

QWhy do privacy advocates in the European Parliament favor an offline-only digital euro?

APrivacy advocates favor an offline-only digital euro because it offers cash-like anonymity for transactions, especially for small payments, and prevents centralized authorities from having unprecedented visibility into consumers' daily spending, which they argue is a risk with online CBDCs.

QWhat is the position of the EU Council regarding the digital euro's functionality?

AThe EU Council adopted a negotiating position on December 19 that favors a hybrid system with both online and offline functionality, aligning closely with the European Commission's 2023 proposal.

QWhat concerns have data protection authorities raised about the online digital euro model?

AThe European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) have warned that the systematic logging of online payments risks violating EU data-minimization principles and lacks strong legal grounding for privacy guarantees.

QWhen are negotiations between the EU Council and the European Parliament on the digital euro expected to take place?

ANegotiations between the EU Council and the European Parliament are set to take place throughout 2026 to resolve the differences in their positions on the digital euro's design and functionality.

Letture associate

King of Death Spiral Financing: Riding the Bitcoin Wave to the Top of Japan's Capital Market

Michael Lerch, a controversial American investor and head of Evolution Financial Group, has become the dominant force in Japan's "death spiral" financing market. His fund, Evo, is the largest buyer of floating-strike equity warrants, a financing tool for distressed small-cap companies that provides quick cash but causes significant shareholder dilution. In 2025, Evo's transactions, which accounted for over 80% of the market, exceeded ¥1 trillion ($63 billion), driven largely by a massive deal with Metaplanet. The hotel operator used the funds to purchase over $2 billion in Bitcoin, causing its stock to skyrocket before crashing 80%. While some CEOs credit Lerch with saving their companies, others accuse his aggressive tactics of damaging shareholder value and corporate reputations. Based in Nevada, Lerch built his empire through arbitrage and a vast network, but his methods have drawn regulatory scrutiny and legal challenges, including a London court ruling against his firm in a dispute with a former employee. The rise of Evo highlights the dilemma for Japan's many small listed companies that rely on such high-cost financing to survive.

marsbit3 min fa

King of Death Spiral Financing: Riding the Bitcoin Wave to the Top of Japan's Capital Market

marsbit3 min fa

Google Is Really Anxious, Launches Deep Research Agent Late at Night with MCP Support and Native Charts

Google has launched two new AI research agents, Deep Research and Deep Research Max, built on the Gemini 3.1 Pro model. These agents are designed for enterprise and developer use, accessible via API, and support integration of open web data with private enterprise information through a single API call. They also feature native chart and infographic generation within reports and support the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to connect with third-party data sources securely. Deep Research is optimized for speed and lower latency, while Deep Research Max prioritizes depth and extended reasoning, making it suitable for asynchronous workflows like overnight analysis tasks. The agents are not available to general Gemini app users, including Pro subscribers, and are currently offered as a paid preview through the Interactions API. The update aims to position Google competitively against rivals like OpenAI and Anthropic in the AI research and analysis tool space, particularly targeting high-value sectors such as finance and consulting. Enhanced capabilities include multi-modal input support, collaborative planning features, and improved performance on benchmarks, though comparative data with competitors should be interpreted cautiously due to potential methodological differences.

marsbit4 min fa

Google Is Really Anxious, Launches Deep Research Agent Late at Night with MCP Support and Native Charts

marsbit4 min fa

Booking.com Founder Jeff Hoffman: How Web3 and AI Are Reshaping the Trillion-Dollar Social Travel Market

Booking.com co-founder Jeff Hoffman discusses how Web3 and AI are set to reshape the multitrillion-dollar social travel market. Hoffman, who co-founded Priceline and helped build Booking.com into a global giant, emphasizes that the current travel industry remains fragmented and inefficient. He argues that Web3 introduces structural disruption by enabling direct connections, transparent economics, and faster settlements, while AI powers personalization and smarter recommendations. Hoffman highlights key trends driving this shift: travelers demand flexible, authentic rewards instead of expiring points; digital and borderless payments are becoming standard; and people trust communities more than ads. He joined Staynex not for its Web3 label but because it aligns with these trends—integrating booking, rewards, AI, and payments into a seamless ecosystem. Looking ahead, Hoffman predicts travel will evolve from transactional to relational, with blockchain enabling transparent rewards and cross-border payments, and AI delivering hyper-personalized experiences. He believes the most valuable platforms will own the network around payments, loyalty, and community, making social travel one of the most underestimated opportunities in Web3.

marsbit38 min fa

Booking.com Founder Jeff Hoffman: How Web3 and AI Are Reshaping the Trillion-Dollar Social Travel Market

marsbit38 min fa

Is It Illegal for Crypto KOLs to Run Paid Communities and Sell Courses?

Summary: This article, authored by lawyer Shao Shiwei, addresses the legal risks faced by crypto Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) who offer paid communities and courses related to cryptocurrency trading. The author explains that while there is no direct licensing system for such activities in China, authorities still reference virtual currency policies in enforcement. KOL activities are categorized into three risk levels: 1. Low-risk: Historical trend analysis and basic education without real-time guidance. 2. Medium-risk: Providing daily market analysis and ambiguous suggestions (e.g., "this position is worth watching"). 3. High-risk: Explicit trading signals, specific buy/sell points, or profit-sharing arrangements. Key legal risks include civil liability (e.g., user lawsuits over losses) and criminal charges (e.g., fraud accusations if users suffer losses). Even disclaimers like "not investment advice" may not protect KOLs, as courts focus on the实质 (substance) of the content. The article emphasizes that risk depends on whether content is perceived as operational guidance, its influence on user decisions, and payment structures. KOLs are advised to assess their specific business models carefully.

marsbit1 h fa

Is It Illegal for Crypto KOLs to Run Paid Communities and Sell Courses?

marsbit1 h fa

Cook's Curtain Call and Ternus Takes the Helm: The Disruption and Reboot of Apple's 4 Trillion Dollar Empire

Tim Cook has officially announced he will step down as CEO of Apple in September, transitioning to executive chairman after a 15-year tenure during which he grew the company’s market value from around $350 billion to nearly $4 trillion. He will be succeeded by John Ternus, a 50-year-old hardware engineering veteran who has been groomed for the role through increasing public visibility and internal responsibility. Ternus’s appointment signals a strategic shift toward hardware and engineering leadership, with Johny Srouji—head of Apple Silicon—taking on an expanded role as Chief Hardware Officer. This consolidation aims to strengthen Apple’s core technological capabilities. However, Cook’s departure highlights a significant unresolved issue: Apple’s delayed and fragmented approach to artificial intelligence. Despite early efforts, such as hiring John Giannandrea from Google in 2018, Apple’s AI initiatives—particularly around Siri—have struggled with internal restructuring and reliance on external partnerships, including with Google. The transition comes at a critical moment as Apple faces paradigm shifts with the rise of artificial general intelligence (ASI). The company’s closed ecosystem of hardware, software, and services—once a major advantage—now presents challenges in adapting to an AI-centric world where intelligence may matter more than the device itself. Ternus must quickly articulate a clear AI strategy, possibly starting at WWDC, to reassure markets and redefine Apple’s role in a new technological era. His task is not only to maintain Apple’s operational excellence but also to reinvigorate its capacity to innovate and lead in the age of AI.

marsbit2 h fa

Cook's Curtain Call and Ternus Takes the Helm: The Disruption and Reboot of Apple's 4 Trillion Dollar Empire

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures