On the Eve of the Explosion of On-Chain Options

marsbitPubblicato 2026-03-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-12

Introduzione

On-Chain Options on the Brink of Breakout The cryptocurrency options market is larger than most realize, with CME's crypto derivatives volume up 46% year-over-year. Institutional investors require defined-risk tools like options for hedging large positions. A pivotal shift occurred in mid-2025 when Bitcoin options open interest reached $65 billion, surpassing futures for the first time, indicating a move from pure leverage to risk-defined instruments. Growth is concentrated on Deribit (now backed by Coinbase after its acquisition) and traditional finance capital via IBIT options. While decentralized derivatives have grown from 2% to over 10% market share in two years, on-chain options remain nascent. @DeriveXYZ leads with over $700 million in notional options volume over 30 days. It has evolved from an AMM to a gas-free central limit order book on its own L2, featuring portfolio margin and cross-margin. @KyanExchange is approaching similarly with on-chain portfolio margining and partial liquidation mechanics. Structured products and asset managers urgently need options for their defined risk/return profiles. Institutional demand is clear, with IBIT options OI surpassing the gold ETF GLD and CME handling $3 trillion in crypto derivatives notional volume in 2025. Regulatory clarity is improving. A joint statement from the SEC and CFTC in 2025 allows regulated exchanges to trade spot crypto assets, and the CLARITY Act has passed the House. This improved environment, alongsid...

Author: Delphi Digital

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

The size of the cryptocurrency options market far exceeds most people's perceptions. Trading volume for cryptocurrency derivatives on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) is 46% higher than the record high set last year. Institutional investors need clear risk management tools to hedge large positions, and options are the only cryptocurrency instrument that provides this functionality.

Reshaping the Landscape

By mid-2025, the total open interest in Bitcoin options reached $65 billion, surpassing futures open interest for the first time. Futures are leverage tools, while options allow funds to set a cap on losses for their $500 million Bitcoin holdings by paying a premium. This turning point indicates that tools with defined risk functions are gradually replacing pure leverage tools.

This growth has been concentrated on two platforms. Deribit has been the mainstream platform for cryptocurrency options trading for years. After being acquired by Coinbase for $2.9 billion in 2025, it gained institutional-grade endorsement. Meanwhile, IBIT options, launched in late 2024, brought traditional financial capital into this field. The options market is expanding rapidly, but the vast majority of trading still requires intermediaries.

On-Chain Options Are Still in Their Infancy

The market share of decentralized derivatives has climbed from 2% to over 10% in two years. Hyperliquid has proven that decentralized exchanges (DEXs) can rival centralized exchanges in speed and transparency. However, no similar representative project has emerged for on-chain options yet.

@DeriveXYZ remains the leading on-chain options protocol, with a nominal options trading volume exceeding $700 million in the past 30 days. The protocol was launched in August 2021 under the name Lyra as an options automated market maker (AMM). After weathering the bear market, it was completely rebuilt in 2023 and is now built on its own OP Stack Layer 2 with a gas-free central limit order book.

This rebuild fundamentally changed the pricing mechanism. Market makers quote prices directly on the order book, leading to narrower spreads, more precise pricing, and support for larger trades. Traders enjoy zero gas fees and sub-second execution speeds.

Its portfolio margin system has also attracted institutional attention. The system assesses overall position risk through scenario analysis. For example, if a trader holds both a long call option and a short put option on the same underlying asset, the system does not charge margin for each leg separately.

The collateral required for a hedged position is lower than the simple sum of the individual parts, which is the common logic in traditional financial derivatives trading desks. Derive also offers perpetual contracts and lending services on the same Layer 2, supporting cross-product cross-margining.

@KyanExchange is moving in the same direction but in a different way. This platform combines an order book matching engine with on-chain portfolio margining, supporting multi-leg operations in a single atomic transaction. Traders can deploy an iron condor strategy with just a few clicks.

Kyan's liquidation mechanism also differs from most DeFi protocols. When a margin threshold is breached, the platform does not liquidate the entire account but executes a partial close-out, only closing the minimum number of positions necessary to bring the account back to the margin requirement. Kyan is currently in the Arbitrum test phase, with a mainnet launch imminent.

Who Needs Options?

Asset management companies building structured products urgently need the clearly defined risk-return profiles provided by options. Take J.P. Morgan's Equity Premium Income ETF as an example. This fund is built on a covered call strategy and is one of the largest actively managed funds globally. The total assets under management for yield products based on derivatives exceed one hundred billion dollars. As more institutional capital moves on-chain, the corresponding hedging needs will migrate as well.

Currently, more and more institutional investors already hold or plan to allocate to digital assets in the short term. The open interest for IBIT options has surpassed that of the gold ETF GLD. In 2025, the CME processed a nominal trading volume of $3 trillion in cryptocurrency derivatives.

The Timing is Ripening

Most early on-chain options protocols failed to survive, primarily due to regulatory uncertainty. For instance, Opyn was fined by the CFTC for operating an unlicensed derivatives exchange. At that time, teams developing products could not predict whether their product would be deemed illegal the next quarter.

This situation is now improving. In September 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) jointly issued a statement allowing regulated exchanges to conduct spot crypto asset trading. The CLARITY Act has passed the House of Representatives, proposing to place spot markets for digital commodities under CFTC oversight. The Senate version is still under negotiation and is currently stalled. CME Group will launch 24/7 cryptocurrency options trading on May 29th. While this does not guarantee that on-chain protocols will necessarily succeed, the overall environment has undergone a fundamental shift.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat major shift occurred in the Bitcoin derivatives market in mid-2025, and what does it signify?

AIn mid-2025, the total open interest for Bitcoin options reached $65 billion, surpassing that of futures for the first time. This signifies a shift is underway from purely leveraged tools (futures) to instruments with defined risk (options), as institutions seek better risk management tools for their large holdings.

QWhich two platforms are highlighted as the main drivers of growth in the cryptocurrency options market?

AThe growth is concentrated on two platforms: Deribit, which gained institutional credibility after its acquisition by Coinbase, and IBIT options, which introduced TradFi capital into the space starting in late 2024.

QWhat is the current state of on-chain options, and which protocol is mentioned as the current leader?

AOn-chain options are described as being in their infancy. The leading on-chain options protocol mentioned is @DeriveXYZ, which has processed over $700 million in notional options volume in the past 30 days.

QHow did the protocol @DeriveXYZ (formerly Lyra) improve its system after a 2023 overhaul?

AThe 2023 overhaul replaced its AMM model with a gas-free central limit order book (CLOB) built on its own OP Stack Layer 2. This allowed market makers to quote prices directly, leading to tighter spreads, more precise pricing, support for larger trades, and sub-second execution speeds for traders.

QWhat are two key reasons mentioned for why the environment for on-chain options is now more favorable than before?

ATwo key reasons are: 1) Improved regulatory clarity, exemplified by a joint SEC-CFTC statement allowing regulated exchanges to trade spot crypto assets and the progress of the CLARITY Act. 2) The growing institutional demand for defined-risk tools, as seen with the massive success of CME's crypto derivatives and IBIT options.

Letture associate

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit6 h fa

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit6 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit8 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit8 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit8 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit8 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片