Oil Again Becomes the Main Subject on the Chain|TradeXYZ Weekend Watch

marsbitPubblicato 2026-06-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-22

Introduzione

Tensions surrounding the Iran-US ceasefire memorandum and the Strait of Hormuz drove volatile market movements over the weekend of June 19-22. Despite an initial announcement of a deal, friction escalated when Israel continued airstrikes in Lebanon, prompting Iran to threaten closing the strait. This pushed crude oil prices to a peak near $79. Subsequent aggressive rhetoric from Trump, including threats to potentially take control of the strait, added to volatility. However, by June 22, negotiations in Switzerland showed progress, with Iran indicating it would not block the strait for 60 days, causing oil prices to retreat nearly 6% from their highs. US stock indices traded flat to slightly lower, with minor declines in major tech and growth stocks. In commodities, gold and silver gained, supported by falling yields and a weaker dollar amid receding inflation fears rather than traditional safe-haven demand. Natural gas prices rose (+2.51%) following an explosion at a key Qatari LNG facility, though this was partially offset by signals that Qatari LNG shipments were preparing to resume. Overall, geopolitical developments in the Middle East remained the primary driver for oil and related asset prices.

Last weekend, Trump announced 'an agreement with Iran is complete' and the Strait of Hormuz would open. But peace is never delivered by a single post from Trump. This weekend, the implementation of the ceasefire Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) encountered its first significant friction—and oil prices, precious metals, and stock indices all moved back and forth in a complete cycle, pulled by this main narrative.

On June 19-20, Israel conducted sustained airstrikes against Lebanon. Iran once postponed talks with the US as a result, with the Revolutionary Guards declaring a 'high state of alert' and threatening to withdraw from negotiations if Israeli strikes continued.

On June 20, Trump, while stating that 'about 700 ships are transiting the Strait, and Iran must reach an agreement within 60 days,' described the ceasefire MOU in an interview as 'basically Iran's unconditional surrender,' and threatened 'further action' if no deal is reached within 60 days. Tehran was thoroughly angered. Later that day, Iran's Supreme Military Joint Headquarters once declared the Strait of Hormuz closed due to US-Israeli 'violations of the ceasefire MOU.' Although US Central Command refuted this, claiming 'Iran does not control the Strait,' 55 commercial vessels still passed through that day.

On June 21, technical-level quadrilateral (US, Iran, Qatar, Pakistan) consultations commenced in Bürgenstock, Switzerland, led personally by Vice President Vance, with Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi sitting at the same table. During the initial 80-minute closed-door session, the Iranian delegation briefly left in protest over Trump's remarks but soon returned.

By June 22 (this morning), the atmosphere had noticeably warmed. Qatar and Pakistan issued a joint statement announcing three phased outcomes: the establishment of a high-level political oversight committee, the locking-in of a 60-day roadmap for a final agreement, and the activation of a mechanism for resolving the Lebanon conflict. The mediators described the negotiation atmosphere as 'extremely positive and constructive.' Pakistan also revealed that Iran would not obstruct ship passage through the Strait in the next 60 days, and passage would be free of charge. An Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson stated that 'the Swiss talks have made good progress.'

Crude Oil

Crude oil continued to oscillate with the news over the weekend but maintained an overall downtrend.

On June 19, citing US intelligence, The New York Times reported that 'Israel is likely to continue striking Lebanon,' pushing oil prices from $76.5 to around $78.

On the evening of June 20, when Iran's Supreme Military Headquarters declared the 'closure of the Strait,' oil prices surged instantly to a high of $79.

Subsequently, Trump made more aggressive remarks to Fox: 'The US may take over the Strait of Hormuz and charge tolls if necessary,' 'taking over the Strait means the US gets 20% of the oil,' and claimed to have had overnight calls with Iranian officials. Crude oil then rose slowly.

In the early hours of June 22, the Iranian Foreign Ministry's characterization that 'the Swiss talks have made good progress' led crude oil futures to retreat nearly 6% from the weekend's highs.

US Stocks

Compared to crude oil's sharp volatility, US stocks performed much more flatly this week.

On the index front, XYZ100 and SP500 basically oscillated around the zero line throughout the weekend, weakening intraday at one point (SP500 briefly probed near −0.6%) before recovering alongside the opening gains in index futures.

At the individual stock level, most followed the broader market slightly lower: tech sector SKHX −0.79%, MU −0.63%, NVDA −0.8%, SMSN −3.0%;

High-beta growth stocks SPCX −1.51%, DRAM −1.68%, MRVL −1.22% also pulled back in sync; relatively strong stocks included MSTR +0.89% and HIMS +0.38%.

Commodity Futures

Gold and silver saw a gap-up at the futures market open. This continued the 're-pricing of easing' logic that emerged last weekend. Falling oil prices reinforced expectations of peak inflation, lower yields, and a weaker dollar, which instead supported precious metals, rather than traditional safe-haven buying.

An unexpected move was the counter-trend rise in natural gas (+2.51%).

The increase may stem from an accident. Earlier today, a fire and explosion occurred at a natural gas plant at Qatar's core LNG processing base, Ras Laffan, injuring 54 people with 18 missing. The Barzan gas plant at this base supplies gas for Qatar's domestic industry and power generation. It is still unclear if LNG production is affected. Qatar was the world's second-largest LNG exporter before the war and had temporarily suspended production due to facility attacks and Strait closures in the early stages of the conflict.

In subtle contrast to this explosion was another 'production resumption' signal: Qatar has begun recalling empty LNG carriers to re-enter the Persian Gulf, with market predictions that gas supply from Qatar is about to resume.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, what were the key events from June 19 to June 22 that caused volatility in the price of crude oil?

AOn June 19, crude oil rose from $76.5 to near $78 after a New York Times report suggested Israel would likely continue strikes in Lebanon. On the evening of June 20, it surged to a high near $79 after Iran's top military command announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. It saw further slow gains following Trump's aggressive comments about potentially taking control of the Strait. Finally, on the morning of June 22, prices fell nearly 6% from the weekend's high after Iran's Foreign Ministry characterized the Swiss talks as having 'made good progress.'

QHow did the US stock market, specifically indices and tech stocks, perform over the weekend described in the article?

AThe US stock market performance was relatively flat. Major indices like the XYZ100 and SP500 oscillated near the zero line, with the SP500 briefly dipping to around -0.6% before recovering. In the tech sector, stocks like SKHX fell -0.79%, MU -0.63%, NVDA -0.8%, and SMSN -3.0%. High-beta growth stocks such as SPCX, DRAM, and MRVL also saw declines of over 1%.

QWhat was the unexpected commodity that rose in price over the weekend, and what event likely caused this increase?

ANatural gas was the unexpected commodity that rose in price, gaining +2.51%. The increase was likely triggered by an explosion and fire at the Barzan gas plant in Qatar's key Ras Laffan LNG processing complex. The incident resulted in 54 injuries and 18 missing persons, raising concerns about potential supply disruptions.

QWhat was the outcome of the four-party technical-level consultations held in Switzerland, as mentioned in the article?

AAccording to statements from Qatar and Pakistan, the consultations in Switzerland yielded three main results: 1) The establishment of a high-level political oversight committee, 2) A finalized 60-day roadmap for a final agreement, and 3) The launch of a mechanism to resolve the conflict in Lebanon. Mediators described the atmosphere as 'extremely positive and constructive.' Pakistan also indicated that Iran would not block ships from passing through the Strait of Hormuz for the next 60 days and that passage would be free.

QAccording to the article, what was the primary market logic supporting the prices of gold and silver over the weekend, rather than traditional safe-haven buying?

AThe primary logic supporting gold and silver prices was a 'loose re-pricing' driven by macroeconomic factors. Falling oil prices reinforced expectations of peak inflation, leading to lower bond yields and a weaker US dollar. This environment was supportive for precious metals, rather than direct safe-haven demand due to geopolitical tensions.

Letture associate

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报57 min fa

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报57 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1 h fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1 h fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 h fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片