Official Trump: Should traders sell before TRUMP drops to $2.36?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-10

Introduzione

The memecoin sector posted overall gains of 0.93%, reaching a market cap of $29.93 billion. While some memecoins like PIPPIN and PENGU saw short-term gains, Official Trump (TRUMP) declined 4.23% in 24 hours and has been one of the weakest performers, down 15.8% over the past week and 39.6% year-to-date. The token has been in a sustained downtrend, failing to reclaim key resistance levels. Technical analysis suggests further downside, with potential price targets at $2.368 and $1.312. Although a short-term bounce may occur due to bullish divergence, it is likely an opportunity to sell rather than a trend reversal. The overall outlook for TRUMP remains bearish.

The memecoin sector posted overall gains, rising 0.93% to reach a total market cap of $29.93 billion.

At press time, the best-performing popular memes in the short-term were Pippin [PIPPIN] and Pudgy Penguins [PENGU], gaining 14.2% and 4.6%, respectively, in 24 hours.

Dogecoin [DOGE] was only up 0.59% for the day, by contrast, and Official Trump [TRUMP] was down by 4.23%. TRUMP has been one of the weakest memes over the past week, sliding 15.8% and operating within a longer-term downtrend.

In 2026, Official Trump has recorded a 39.6% drawdown. The bearish long-term trend meant that more losses were likely.

Plotting the next TRUMP price target

The first two weeks of the year saw a sizeable bounce across the crypto market, and Official Trump token prices also surged briefly above $5.5. Towards the end of January, the price fell below the previous swing low at $4.68 (orange).

This marked a continuation of the downtrend. Since then, the bears have remained in control, driving prices lower relentlessly. In early February, a big imbalance (white box) was left around $3.6-$4.1

Over the past month, TRUMP prices visited this area multiple times, but were unable to climb meaningfully into it. This highlighted the $4 zone as a powerful supply zone. At the time of writing, the price was below the psychological round number support at $3.

The Fibonacci extension levels showed that the next price targets were $2.368 and $1.312.

Should traders sell the bounce?

The 4-hour chart showed a bullish divergence between the price and the momentum. It was a sign that a price bounce was likely, but it would not be enough to reverse the downtrend. Instead, traders can use the price bounce to sell.

The Fibonacci retracement levels showed that the bounce could reach $3.01-$3.05. Traders can watch out for a bearish reaction from $2.95-3.05 before selling the memecoin.


Final Summary

  • The memecoin sector saw some bullishness in the past 24 hours, but it was too little momentum to reverse the longer-term downtrend.
  • TRUMP was one of the weaker-performing memes, and its downtrend looks likely to continue.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the overall performance of the memecoin sector and its total market cap at the time of the article?

AThe memecoin sector posted overall gains of 0.93%, reaching a total market cap of $29.93 billion.

QWhich two memecoins were the best-performing in the short-term, and what were their 24-hour gains?

APippin [PIPPIN] and Pudgy Penguins [PENGU] were the best-performing, gaining 14.2% and 4.6% respectively in 24 hours.

QHow has the Official Trump (TRUMP) memecoin performed over the past week and what is its longer-term trend?

ATRUMP was down 4.23% for the day and has been one of the weakest memes over the past week, sliding 15.8% and operating within a longer-term downtrend.

QAccording to the Fibonacci extension levels, what are the next potential price targets for TRUMP?

AThe next price targets for TRUMP are $2.368 and $1.312.

QWhat trading strategy does the article suggest for TRUMP based on the 4-hour chart analysis?

AThe article suggests that traders can use a potential price bounce to sell, watching for a bearish reaction from the $2.95-$3.05 zone (a Fibonacci retracement level) as an opportunity to exit.

Letture associate

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit6 h fa

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit6 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit8 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit8 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit8 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit8 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片