NYSE Plans to Launch 24/7 Tokenized Stock Trading, Leaving "Competitors" Stunned

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2026-01-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-19

Introduzione

NYSE plans to launch a 24/7 tokenized stock trading and on-chain settlement platform, a move seen as a direct response to Nasdaq's similar application submitted last September. The proposed platform would allow round-the-clock trading of U.S. stocks and ETFs, fractional shares, stablecoin-based settlements, and instant settlement, while maintaining equal dividend and governance rights for tokenized stocks. NYSE's parent company ICE is also collaborating with major banks to develop tokenized deposit and clearing infrastructure. This initiative is viewed as a significant step in merging traditional finance with blockchain technology, potentially eliminating the distinction between crypto and traditional assets. While some industry experts welcome it as a major modernization that brings global accessibility and efficiency, others express concerns about increased market complexity, the impact on younger investors, and the potential marginalization of existing crypto RWA projects due to NYSE's massive liquidity advantage. The approval process by the SEC is expected to take until late 2026, leaving a window of opportunity for crypto-native platforms to leverage their strengths in areas like permissionless access and global liquidity.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010)

"Flash Crash Monday" is not over yet. Just now, the crypto market was hit with another bombshell—according to multiple media sources, the NYSE plans to launch a tokenized securities trading and on-chain settlement platform supporting 24/7 trading. After investing $2 billion in Polymarket last year, the ICE Group is once again joining the wave of cryptocurrency transformation, this time using its stock exchange as the vehicle. It is worth mentioning that as early as last September, the "competitor" Nasdaq had already submitted an application to the SEC for tokenized stock trading. The NYSE's move is also interpreted by the outside world as a response to competition among stock exchanges.

Odaily Planet Daily will briefly summarize the market views related to this event and explore its potential impact.

NYSE Can't Sit Still: A More Radical "On-Chain Tokenized Stock Solution" Than Nasdaq

After Trump took office, the U.S. cryptocurrency regulatory environment changed dramatically. As a result, crypto IPOs, stablecoins, PayFi, and DeFi have swept away the policy gloom of the Biden era and are developing rapidly. According to statistics, last year's stablecoin trading volume reached $33 trillion, a sharp increase of 72% year-on-year. Behind this is the substantial revenue and profits earned by stablecoin issuers Tether and Circle, as well as the massive liquidity that can be directed to the stock securities market.

Moreover, unlike Nasdaq's application to the SEC for tokenized stock trading last September, nearly six months later, the NYSE's moves related to "tokenized stock trading" are not just an application to regulators but a complete set of on-chain solutions. Recommended reading: "The Self-Revolution of U.S. Stock Exchanges: Nasdaq Applies for Tokenized Stock Trading, Targeting a Trillion-Dollar Market."

Specifically, the NYSE's "on-chain tokenized stock solution" includes the following three aspects:

  1. This is a tokenized securities trading and on-chain settlement platform, planning to support 24/7 trading of U.S. stocks and ETF funds, fractional share trading, stablecoin-based fund settlement, and instant delivery, and will combine NYSE's existing matching engine with a blockchain settlement system.
  2. According to the NYSE's plan, tokenized stocks will have the same dividends and governance rights as traditional securities.
  3. NYSE's parent company ICE is also collaborating with banking giants such as BNY Mellon and Citigroup to explore tokenized deposits and clearing infrastructure to support cross-time zone, round-the-clock fund and margin management.

In comparison, if Nasdaq's tokenized stock application seems like a "new bottle for old wine" move in response to policy, then the NYSE's plan seems like a "new retail trading platform" that integrates all links from "brewing-packaging-distribution-recycling."

Most importantly, the NYSE's "tokenized stock" trading platform supports 24/7 trading, which was originally one of the advantages of various cryptocurrencies over securities stocks. Now, this advantage becomes a joke in the face of the massive asset targets and liquidity of the world's largest stock exchange, the NYSE.

As a result, there are some pessimistic views in the crypto market: "The RWA sector of the cryptocurrency market and its increasingly tight liquidity will face the strictest 'father.' Compared to the NYSE, which has an annual trading volume of over a hundred trillion dollars, crypto RWA projects can almost be said to be non-existent."

What Do Industry Practitioners Think: Mixed Impacts, The Past Is the Past, The Present Is Now

In 1792, 24 securities brokers signed the Buttonwood Agreement under a buttonwood tree outside 68 Wall Street in New York, marking the birth of the predecessor of the NYSE. At that time, limited by the small number of investment targets and limited market activity, stock trading hours were more flexible, without strict continuous trading sessions. Brokers mainly conducted transactions through auctions or informal methods.

On March 8, 1817, the organization drafted a charter and officially changed its name to the New York Stock Exchange Board.

In May 1887, the NYSE standardized stock trading hours to "Monday to Friday: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.; Saturday: 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m."

In 1952, Saturday trading was officially canceled.

In 1985, stock trading opening time was moved forward to 9:30 a.m., and closing was extended to 4:00 p.m., forming the current 9:30–16:00 session, which has lasted for about 41 years.

If the NYSE's application for 24/7 tokenized stock trading is approved, it means that this decades-long or even centuries-old "limited-time model" will become history. From this perspective, the crypto market has gained high recognition from the mainstream financial world.

Pro View: The Era's Train Is Roaring Forward

BTC OG and BankToTheFuture founder Simon Dixon posted, "Nothing can stop this (era's) train. Tokens are IOUs for actual assets held by custodians, supplementing DTCC claims. All-day trading can be achieved without tokens. This is an upgraded version of the monitoring state. You will own nothing, and you will be happy." The accompanying picture shows BlackRock CEO Larry Fink and Coinbase CEO Brain Armstrong embracing.

Indian crypto KOL Open4profit posted, "(This will) allow the market to react immediately to global news; AI and algorithms will play a greater role in pricing and risk management; this is a major change for the stock market, pay close attention to liquidity changes."

Redstone DeFi co-founder Marcin saw a "startup opportunity," saying, "This is a good start and fits exactly with what we are going to do next."

Wintermute OTC business head Jake O also highly affirmed this: "Traditional infrastructure can extend trading hours but cannot solve T+1/2 friction or eliminate rent-seeking behaviors that increase costs and delays. Ironically, cryptocurrency solved this years ago: 24/7 trading, instant settlement, global access, no gatekeepers or (traditional bank) 'data fees.' Integration is inevitable: equity trading on-chain, atomic settlement, the line between 'crypto' assets and 'traditional' assets will completely disappear. Welcome to the 21st century..."

Of course, some see it as an opportunity, while others see it as a threat.

Con View: Exchanges Reap the Benefits, the Suffering Falls on the New Generation of Young People

Unlike the industry view that the NYSE's move will stimulate the crypto market and promote cryptocurrency popularization, some industry insiders also see potential problems.

L1D partner LouisT posted: "The entire global financial system is moving on-chain, but somehow, they don't seem to be bidding for our 'bear drug-like' tokens." In other words, traditional financial markets are not buying into the so-called RWA assets of cryptocurrencies.

MoonRock Capital founder expressed concern about the living conditions of the younger generation: "This is not good news for the baby boomer generation, your life has become more difficult." He probably means that compared to previous generations with more increments, the baby boomer generation faces a more complex investment environment and a round-the-clock "liquidity game stage."

BingX advisor Nebraskangooner also raised his doubts: "Why make the stock market trade 24 hours a day? No one wants this except the exchanges. The only benefit is that without the interference of after-hours trading, stop-loss and take-profit points can truly function. Not sure what impact this will have on stock price movements after earnings reports?" This view focuses more on information impact and exchange profits.

Summary: There Is Still a Gap Between Traditional Finance and Crypto-Native Groups, Opportunities for Users and Entrepreneurs Remain

Finally, I would like to briefly share my personal views based on the above information:

First, based on current information, the NYSE's relevant application may be approved as early as the end of 2026, and the main approval agency is still the U.S. SEC. For crypto platforms, this is an important time gap.

Second, the main service targets of the NYSE's tokenized stock trading and on-chain settlement platform are likely still conventional investment institutions and compliant investors. For crypto-native groups and even global investors, what they need is not only the satisfaction of functional needs but also the realization of "KYC-free registration trading, global asset liquidity allocation, and riskier high-leverage" through tokenized stocks and RWA platforms. This may be the advantage of crypto RWA projects.

Finally, the core purpose of the NYSE, Nasdaq, etc., in promoting stock tokenization is still trading volume and fees. Like CEXs constantly listing new token projects, in the short term, they may still need to learn from CEXs, DEXs, and even on-chain Perp DEXs. This is also the basis for existing mature platforms to counterattack. By then, it is not impossible for U.S. stock exchanges like the NYSE and Nasdaq to fall from grace. The key still lies in where the liquidity is, where the attention is, and where the user base is.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) planning to launch according to the article?

AThe NYSE is planning to launch a tokenized securities trading and on-chain settlement platform that supports 7*24 hour trading, fractional shares, stablecoin-based fund settlement, and instant settlement for U.S. stocks and ETF funds.

QHow does the NYSE's tokenized stock trading plan differ from Nasdaq's application submitted last September?

AUnlike Nasdaq's application, which was seen as a regulatory response, the NYSE's plan is a comprehensive 'on-chain solution' that integrates its existing matching engine with a blockchain settlement system and includes partnerships with banking giants for tokenized deposits and clearing infrastructure.

QWhat potential negative impact does the article suggest this move could have on the cryptocurrency market?

AThe article suggests that the NYSE's entry into tokenized trading could severely challenge existing crypto RWA (Real World Asset) projects, as the NYSE's massive liquidity and asset scale might make crypto RWA projects seem insignificant by comparison.

QWhat is one major historical change in trading hours that the NYSE's new plan would represent?

AThe NYSE's plan to enable 7*24 hour trading would end the traditional limited trading hours model, which has been in place for decades, with the current 9:30 AM to 4:00 PM trading session lasting about 41 years.

QAccording to the article, what might be a key advantage that crypto-native RWA platforms still hold over traditional exchanges like the NYSE?

ACrypto-native RWA platforms may still hold advantages such as enabling global trading without KYC requirements, facilitating cross-border liquidity allocation, and offering higher leverage options, which appeal to crypto-native and global investors.

Letture associate

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit50 min fa

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit50 min fa

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit1 h fa

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit1 h fa

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit1 h fa

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit1 h fa

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit3 h fa

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片