New York Attorney General Opposes CLARITY Act and Calls for Its Review

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-07-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-28

Introduzione

New York Attorney General Letitia James opposes the CLARITY Act, warning it would limit state law enforcement's ability to combat crypto fraud. She cites a tripling of crypto-related complaints and $500 million in losses in New York over five years. James argues the Act undermines local authority to pursue bad actors and calls on Congress to enact stricter regulations instead. Her proposed framework includes enforcing AML and user verification rules, banning access for foreign companies, prohibiting conversion to dollars for untraceable assets, and requiring platforms to monitor and report suspicious activity. She emphasizes that state and local agencies handle most law enforcement and that the Act would weaken investor protections. The bill is currently in the Senate, with consideration delayed due to other priorities.

New York State Attorney General Letitia James stated that the Cryptocurrency Market Structure bill (CLARITY Act) would restrict the activities of law enforcement agencies at the state level, complicating the fight against fraud in the crypto sphere. In this regard, she called on Congress to introduce stricter regulations for this sector.

According to James, in New York State alone, the number of complaints regarding cryptocurrency fraud has tripled in recent years. Furthermore, the volume of losses from such activities over five years, according to the Attorney General's office, amounts to about $500 million. And this is only in the state of New York, she emphasized.

The Attorney General believes that the CLARITY Act would undermine the ability of local authorities to pursue criminals in this field and impose sanctions against unscrupulous counterparties. She also advocates for Congress to impose a complete ban on elected officials and recently departed government employees from regulating the crypto sphere.

Instead, she proposes passing a bill with the following points:

  • Require crypto companies to comply with anti-money laundering (AML), counter-terrorist financing, and user verification measures;
  • Create a closed market inaccessible to foreign companies;
  • Prohibit the conversion into dollars for those crypto assets whose origin cannot be traced, including privacy tokens;
  • A ban on exempting crypto assets from the provisions of money transmission, commodity, and securities laws;
  • Require crypto companies to monitor abnormal activity and report it;

Require platforms and intermediaries to protect Americans from fraud and scams, and hold them accountable for failing to meet this requirement.

"The CLARITY Act aims to interfere with and preempt state investor protection laws, as well as weaken our ability to pursue fraud. This is a mistake. The lion's share of law enforcement work in this country is done by state and local authorities," James summarized.

Also, in the Attorney General's opinion, the framework bill for the crypto market should aim for maximum transparency.

At what stage is the CLARITY Act currently?

The bill has been sent to the Senate for further consideration. If approved, the bill will return to the House of Representatives before being sent to the President for signature. However, as we reported earlier, consideration in the Senate has been postponed due to more pressing issues.

Read more about the initiative's progress:

The CLARITY Act has many opponents. Among them, for example, are Democrats who insist on including expanded ethics provisions in the bill.

end-content

Domande pertinenti

QWho is opposing the CLARITY Act and why?

ANew York Attorney General Letitia James is opposing the CLARITY Act. She argues it would limit the power of state-level law enforcement agencies, complicate the fight against cryptocurrency fraud, and undermine local authorities' ability to pursue offenders and sanction bad actors. She believes it interferes with and preempts state investor protection laws.

QWhat data did Letitia James cite regarding cryptocurrency fraud in New York?

ALetitia James stated that in New York State alone, complaints about crypto-asset fraud have tripled in recent years. Furthermore, over five years, losses from such activities total approximately $500 million, according to her office.

QWhat key measures does Attorney General James propose instead of the CLARITY Act?

AShe proposes legislation that would: 1) Obligate crypto companies to comply with AML, counter-terrorism financing, and user verification rules; 2) Create a closed market inaccessible to foreign companies; 3) Ban conversion to dollars for crypto-assets with untraceable origins, including privacy tokens; 4) Prohibit exempting crypto-assets from money transmitter, commodity, and securities laws; 5) Require crypto companies to monitor and report anomalous activity; 6) Hold platforms and intermediaries accountable for protecting Americans from fraud.

QWhat is the current legislative status of the CLARITY Act?

AThe bill has been sent to the Senate for further consideration. If approved there, it would return to the House of Representatives before being sent to the President for signing. However, Senate consideration has reportedly been delayed due to more pressing legislative priorities.

QWhat is the fundamental goal Letitia James believes a crypto market framework should aim for?

AAttorney General James believes that a framework for the crypto market should be aimed at achieving maximum transparency.

Letture associate

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbit42 min fa

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbit42 min fa

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbit46 min fa

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbit46 min fa

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbit46 min fa

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbit46 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片