NEAR Protocol analysis – Why another 34% drawdown is likely for its price

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-12-18Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-18

Introduzione

NEAR Protocol (NEAR) has declined significantly, losing 11.38% over the past week and 5.74% in the last 24 hours, largely influenced by Bitcoin's high volatility and subsequent drop. Despite a brief surge in Open Interest and bullish Futures data earlier in the week, the momentum was not sustained. NEAR broke below its long-term support level of $1.72 and the $1.82–$3.38 range it had traded in since March, with the weekly close at $1.59 confirming the breakdown. Both the RSI and OBV indicators show strong bearish momentum, indicating dominant selling pressure. A further decline toward the $0.97 support level is likely. A daily close above $1.82 would be needed to shift the bias. Traders are advised to consider shorting on any bounce to the $1.7–$1.8 supply zone, with invalidation above $1.82.

NEAR Protocol [NEAR] has lost 11.38% of its value over the past week, with the altcoin falling by 5.74% in the last 24 hours. The day’s losses came after high volatility on Wednesday, with Bitcoin briefly rallying to $90.2k before plunging immediately to the local support of $85.7k.

This 5.6% Bitcoin [BTC] drop has shaken market sentiment, which was already fearful. This meant that NEAR traders needed to be bearishly biased.

They could have had positive expectations for the week after seeing the Futures data on Monday. There was a 13.1% Open Interest surge, from $122 million to $138 million, and an uptick in spot buying volume.

The Futures funding rate also rose to show short-term bullish sentiment, according to Coinalyze data. This short-term impetus was not sustained, however. Hence, the question – What should traders expect next?

The failure of the long-term range, and its implications

Since March, NEAR Protocol’s token has traded within a range (yellow) that extended from $1.82 to $3.38. The second week of December saw NEAR close a weekly session at $1.59. This was well below the $1.82 range low and the long-term support at $1.72.

The sliding OBV underlined steady sell volume, with the RSI capturing the downward momentum of the altcoin.

The 1-day chart reinforced the bearish trend’s strength. Since the second week of November, the OBV and RSI have both been falling. This reinforced the idea that sellers have been dominant.

The price action revealed that the $1.82-level was retested as resistance, but sellers held up well, not allowing bulls to climb any higher. A few days of consolidation around $1.8 were followed by a NEAR decline.

Is a bullish reversal possible for NEAR from here?

Based on the evidence at hand, a bullish move is highly unlikely. The long-term trend and short-term volatility are likely to send NEAR lower, towards the $0.97 long-term support.

A move back above $1.82 is needed to flip the bias bullishly for NEAR.

Traders’ call to action – Should you sell now or wait for a bounce?

Traders looking to go short need not FOMO after seeing NEAR’s descent in recent days. The price might bounce to the $1.7-$1.8 supply zone that precipitated the current bearish impulse move.

Such a retest would offer a short-selling opportunity, with invalidation being a daily session close above $1.82.


Final Thoughts

  • Bitcoin’s sudden price moves have increased selling pressure across the altcoin market, bearishly affecting tokens such as NEAR.
  • The failure of the long-term range and $1.72 support meant that a move to $1 is likely.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Crypto di tendenza

Letture associate

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手50 min fa

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手50 min fa

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手1 h fa

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare NEAR

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di NEAR Protocol (NEAR) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente NEAR ProtocolNEAR.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva NEAR Protocol (NEAR)Dopo aver acquistato NEAR Protocol (NEAR), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia NEAR Protocol (NEAR)Scambia facilmente NEAR Protocol (NEAR) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

367 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.10Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare NEAR

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di NEAR NEAR sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片