MYX slides 18% while OI climbs to $25M – Is a squeeze brewing?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-11

Introduzione

MYX Finance (MYX) has declined 18% amid weak fundamentals and revenue struggles. Perpetual futures activity is driving the downturn, with a negative funding rate of -1.0858% indicating dominant short positioning. However, Open Interest increased by 1% to $25 million, suggesting capital remains in the market rather than fleeing. Exchange-level data shows a divergence: while the overall market is bearish, platforms like Bybit show a majority of long positions. Spot markets also saw $224,000 in net inflows, indicating selective accumulation. Liquidity clusters above the current price may act as short-term magnets for an upward move, creating potential for near-term upside volatility despite the broader bearish trend.

MYX Finance [MYX] faces a deteriorating price outlook as the asset extends its losses. The weakness in price aligns with soft fundamentals, as the protocol struggles to generate sufficient revenue to cover operational costs.

In the near term, derivatives activity is driving market direction. Positioning across perpetual markets, whether dominated by longs or shorts, is shaping MYX’s short-term price trajectory.

Funding Rates signal short dominance

Perpetual futures activity has reinforced downside pressure. Over the past 24 hours, MYX declined 18%, at press time, with momentum accelerating during the move.

At the same time, CoinGlass data showed that the Funding Rate dropped to -1.0858%. A negative rate indicates that short positions are paying longs, reflecting a market skewed toward bearish positioning. Current price action confirms that sellers are exerting control.

Notably, the negative Funding Rate has not triggered capital flight. Open Interest (OI) rose by 1%, adding approximately $250,000 and bringing total outstanding positions to roughly $25 million.

Typically, sharp negative funding coincides with declining OI as traders unwind exposure. In this case, capital remains in the market, suggesting active participation rather than broad liquidation.

Exchange-level divergence in positioning

Despite short dominance at the aggregate level, exchange-specific data reveal divergence.

Long/Short Ratios across Binance, Bybit, KuCoin, and BingX show higher long participation. Bybit leads, with 51% of total perpetual volume attributed to long positions.

Bybit’s positioning carries added weight, given its substantial share of MYX’s Open Interest and trading volume. This divergence suggests that while overall funding skews negative, certain trader cohorts are positioning for a potential rebound.

Spot market flows show signs of selective accumulation. In the past 24 hours, MYX recorded about $224,000 in net capital inflows. Compared to its typical daily buy activity, this marks a notable uptick in demand.

Liquidity clusters define near-term structure

The liquidation heatmap highlights significant liquidity clusters above the current price. Such concentrations often act as short-term magnets, as price tends to move toward areas with dense leveraged positions.

The presence of larger clusters overhead increases the probability of a liquidity-driven upside move. Downside liquidity remains visible below current levels, though the depth is comparatively smaller than the upside clusters.

As a result, while the broader trend remains bearish, the current liquidity structure leaves room for short-term upside volatility driven by derivatives positioning and liquidation dynamics.


Final Thoughts

  • Short sellers account for a significant share of liquidity in the derivatives market.
  • Traders on Bybit, CoinEx, and BingX are increasing long exposure despite elevated downside risk.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the current price performance of MYX Finance and by how much has it declined?

AMYX has declined by 18% in the past 24 hours, with the momentum of the drop accelerating.

QWhat does the negative Funding Rate of -1.0858% indicate about market sentiment for MYX?

AThe negative Funding Rate indicates that short positions are paying longs, reflecting a market that is skewed toward bearish (short) positioning and that sellers are in control.

QDespite the negative funding, what happened to Open Interest (OI) and what does this suggest?

AOpen Interest (OI) actually rose by 1%, adding approximately $250,000 to bring the total to $25 million. This suggests capital is remaining in the market for active participation rather than traders broadly liquidating and closing their positions.

QWhich exchange shows a majority of long positions for MYX perpetual futures, according to the Long/Short Ratios?

ABybit leads with 51% of its total perpetual volume attributed to long positions.

QAccording to the liquidation heatmap, where are the significant liquidity clusters located and what is their likely effect?

ASignificant liquidity clusters are located above the current price. These concentrations often act as short-term magnets, increasing the probability of a liquidity-driven upside move as price tends to gravitate toward areas with dense leveraged positions.

Letture associate

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit2 h fa

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit2 h fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit3 h fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片