MYX drops 11% as liquidity dries up – Can bulls defend THIS support?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-12-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-19

Introduzione

MYX Finance's price dropped 11% amid a significant decline in liquidity and investor confidence. On-chain data shows Total Value Locked (TVL) fell by $1.16 million to $22.64 million, driven by a 99.37% collapse in protocol earnings since October. Perpetual traders turned bearish, with funding rates turning negative and open interest declining by 14% to $21.27 million. Spot volume also dropped sharply from $171.96 million to $44.74 million. Although MYX is near the lower boundary of an ascending channel, suggesting a possible short-term bounce, key support levels are at $0.34 and $0.23. A break below these may reinforce the broader downtrend. Recovery depends on stabilizing demand across markets.

MYX Finance has stayed in the hot seat over the past day, with sellers dominating market activity as the altcoin plunged 11% during this period.

Sentiment across on-chain and derivatives data stayed weak. That weakness suggested downside risk may persist if demand failed to recover.

Liquidity outflows intensify

On-chain liquidity has declined sharply, with bearish sentiment strengthening as investors continue to exit the protocol.

Total Value Locked (TVL), a key metric that measures a protocol’s health based on investor deposits, points to a fragile outlook.

According to DeFiLlama data, MYX Finance’s [MYX] TVL fell by roughly $1.16 million over eight days. It dropped to about $22.64 million.

AMBCrypto traced the primary driver of this outflow to a sharp decline in the protocol’s earnings in December.

The protocol, which recorded peak earnings of $16,685 in October, has seen revenue collapse to just $105 as of press time. This represented an unprecedented 99.37% decline.

Lower earnings suggested reduced protocol usage, since revenue depended on transaction activity. At the same time, unlocks and withdrawals added selling pressure.

That combination pointed to weakening demand across the ecosystem.

Perpetual traders turn bearish

Perpetual traders have increasingly tilted toward the bearish side of the market.

The Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate turned negative, signaling short-side dominance. At press time, it printed around -0.0140%.

This shift has coincided with a notable 14% decline in Open Interest, which fell to $21.27 million, reflecting a $3.06 million outflow from the Derivatives market.

On top of that, taker-driven Spot Volume declined sharply. Volume fell to $44.74 million from $171.96 million earlier.

Falling price alongside shrinking volume typically confirm bearish conditions. Even so, selling momentum appeared to be slowing.

Possible price movement

Chart analysis showed that MYX has moved into a short-term bullish price structure.

MYX traded near the lower boundary of an ascending channel, suggesting a temporary bullish structure. That positioning could allow a short-lived bounce.

However, the broader structure remained fragile when viewed in historical context.

That setup left traders focused on two key downside levels. The first sat near the recent higher low around $0.34. Below that, the channel’s origin near $0.23 marked the next critical support.

A failure to hold either level could reinforce MYX’s broader downtrend.


Final Thoughts

  • MYX’s recent price weakness reflected broader cracks in liquidity, participation, and trader conviction.
  • While short-term technical support remained intact, sustained recovery may depend on demand stabilizing across both spot and derivatives markets.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the percentage drop in MYX's price and what key metric indicates a fragile outlook for the protocol?

AMYX's price dropped by 11%. The key metric indicating a fragile outlook is the Total Value Locked (TVL), which declined sharply.

QWhat was the primary driver of the liquidity outflow from the MYX Finance protocol according to the article?

AThe primary driver of the liquidity outflow was traced to a sharp decline in the protocol's earnings, which collapsed by 99.37% from its peak in October.

QWhat does a negative Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate signal in the derivatives market?

AA negative Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate signals short-side dominance, meaning perpetual traders are bearish and betting on the price to decrease.

QWhat two key downside price levels are traders focused on for MYX, according to the chart analysis?

ATraders are focused on the recent higher low around $0.34 as the first key level, and the channel's origin near $0.23 as the next critical support level.

QWhat does the combination of falling price and shrinking spot volume typically confirm?

AThe combination of a falling price alongside shrinking volume typically confirms bearish market conditions.

Letture associate

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit50 min fa

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit50 min fa

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手50 min fa

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手50 min fa

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit2 h fa

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片