My 24 Hours Under Bombardment in Dubai

marsbitPubblicato 2026-03-01Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-01

Introduzione

Author Brother Bing recounts 24 hours in Dubai during missile attacks following US-Israel joint declaration of war against Iran. Initially dismissing the conflict due to Dubai's reputation as a safe haven, the author continues daily routines until hearing blasts in the afternoon. Despite explosions nearby, public life remains normal with cafes full and people outdoors. At midnight, intense bombardments prompt evacuation to the garage with neighbors. Rumors spread about leaders' deaths and airport destruction, though authorities later advise returning home. Attacks continue the next morning with reports of Burj Al Arab being hit but minimal casualties. The author analyzes impacts: Dubai's "safe hub" narrative is shattered, potentially affecting tourism, property speculation, and foreign migration. While ground invasion remains unlikely, the psychological blow to stability could divert capital and expatriates to alternatives like Singapore. The author concludes by noting the UAE's efficiency and wealth may mitigate long-term damage, while humorously requesting a bomb shelter for future incidents.

Author: brother bing / Bing Xiong

8:00am: Woke up to a phone notification with news of the United States and Israel jointly declaring war on Iran.

Perhaps I've been in Dubai for too long; I've become somewhat indifferent to the conflicts in this region. Although Dubai is located in a powder keg, the UAE has always been, in my mind, a neutral and safe "Little Switzerland of the Middle East."

After all, money from both legitimate and illegitimate sources flows here. I thought to myself, Iran wouldn't destroy its own little treasury.

  • 9:30am: A colleague came to discuss some matters, so we went downstairs for coffee and brunch. He was flying back to the UK from Abu Dhabi today; his flight wasn't canceled, and there were no changes to his ticket. Everything seemed completely normal.

  • 12:00pm: I went home at noon to start working. Then I saw that Iran had decided to attack the surrounding Gulf countries. I still didn't take it seriously. It wasn't until I saw photos of missiles posted by a friend in Abu Dhabi on Instagram that I realized the situation might be more serious than I thought.

  • 1-3:00pm: Throughout the afternoon, there were constant posts on X from people living near me saying they heard the sound of missile explosions. Since I didn't hear anything myself, I assumed these accounts were spreading false information.

  • 4:30pm: While I was working intently at my computer, a relatively strong explosion suddenly erupted overhead, causing my half-open balcony door to vibrate. I went out to the balcony and, sure enough, the air was filled with the smell of gunpowder.

Because I had a 5:00 pm Pilates class scheduled, or perhaps my brain hadn't fully processed it yet, I closed the balcony door and went downstairs to class. Out on the street, it was still a scene of peace and tranquility. People were walking their babies as usual, walking their dogs as usual.

The café next to the yoga studio was packed. Influencers were still happily taking selfies.

  • 6:00pm: After exercising and returning home, the explosive sounds became more frequent. I saw online that a hotel on the Palm Jumeirah had been hit, and smoke was rising over City Walk.

The funny thing was, I was in the middle of discussing company matters with my co-founder on the phone while hearing explosions outside. I found myself wondering: are those missiles or Ramadan fireworks? A few times, I interrupted the call to go to the balcony and check if anything was falling from the sky.

  • 7:30pm: After finishing the work call, I went downstairs for a walk. The street lights were on, shops were open, and there was no obvious panic among the crowds. Except for the delivery times being a bit longer.

I thought the night would pass quietly, waiting for Khamenei to be captured, the Iranian people to be liberated, and everyone to go home.

But then...

  • 12:30am: I was eating Japanese ramen delivery at home in the middle of the night when I received alerts on all my phones and computers about missile attacks. At that moment, loud, rumbling explosions erupted outside my window. I quickly grabbed my passport, cards, and phone, rushed out the door, took the elevator down to the parking garage. In the elevator were a Ukrainian man and an Indian couple holding their sleeping child.

  • 1:30am: I stayed in the garage for over an hour. During this time, I saw on X that Khamenei had died, but also that Dubai Airport had been completely destroyed. While I was trying to figure it out, building staff came over and told us to go back upstairs to our homes.

When I got home, I saw a message from a friend saying Iran was unlikely to bomb the UAE for now and had turned to attack Israel instead.

  • The next morning, 8:00am: 24 hours have passed. Apart from the Burj Al Arab hotel being hit last night, there don't seem to be mass casualties. In my area, explosive sounds can be heard intermittently.

Iran says it will continue attacks on the Gulf today to pressure the US to stop its attacks on Iran.

Finally, let's talk about the impact of this attack on Dubai and the UAE.

Many people are comparing this event to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which is utterly absurd and shows a lack of thought. Aerial bombardment is one thing; ground warfare is another. The possibility of the UAE's mainland being occupied is extremely low. It's highly unlikely this country will descend into prolonged war.

The real impact is that it violently tears apart the narrative of Dubai as the "gold rush dream" and the "successful case of Middle Eastern reform and opening up." As a global node for tourism and capital flow, Dubai will undoubtedly face short-term shocks. The first to feel the pressure will be the tourism industry. The second will likely be the short-term property speculators.

More long-term, and more dangerous, is a significant reduction in foreign immigration. An economy reliant on foreign population and capital inflow is extremely dependent on a sense of "stability." Many Europeans come to Dubai for job opportunities or tax avoidance; after a few missiles, they might turn to Singapore or other Asian countries.

Of course, the UAE is a highly efficient monarchy. Plus, it's not poor. This black swan event also came at a rather timely moment, serving as a wake-up call for everyone. Next time, please build a bomb shelter in my building.

Enough talk, I'm going downstairs for a coffee.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the author's initial reaction to the news of the US and Israel declaring war on Iran?

AThe author felt indifferent and unconcerned, believing Dubai was a safe, neutral 'Middle Eastern Switzerland' and that Iran wouldn't target its own financial hub.

QWhat was the first physical sign of the conflict that the author personally experienced?

AAt around 4:30 pm, the author heard a strong explosion overhead that caused their half-open balcony door to vibrate and smelled gunpowder in the air.

QHow did the author and other residents react to the missile attacks around 12:30 am?

AThe author grabbed their passport, cards, and phone and rushed to the building's garage for shelter, where they were joined by a Ukrainian man and an Indian couple with their sleeping child.

QAccording to the author, what are the two main short-term economic impacts of the attacks on Dubai?

AThe two main short-term impacts are a blow to the tourism industry and pressure on short-term real estate speculators.

QWhat does the author identify as the more dangerous long-term consequence for Dubai's economy?

AThe more dangerous long-term consequence is a significant reduction in foreign immigration, as the economy relies heavily on an influx of people and capital, which depends on a sense of stability.

Letture associate

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, is facing significant technical challenges as its growth outpaces its current infrastructure on Polygon. Users are experiencing laggy transactions, unresponsive orders, and delayed confirmations, severely impacting the trading experience. In response, DeFi Engineering VP Josh Stevens outlined a comprehensive engineering overhaul. The plan includes reducing on-chain data delays, fixing order cancellation issues, rebuilding the central limit order book (CLOB), improving website performance, and developing a unified SDK and API. A major revelation was the ongoing "chain migration," indicating a potential move away from Polygon. The core issue is that Polymarket has evolved from a simple prediction market into a high-frequency trading platform, making Polygon's limitations—such as block space, gas fees, and block time—a ceiling for further growth. The migration is not just a simple chain switch but a fundamental rebuild of its trading system to support more complex products like perpetual contracts (Perps). This announcement has sparked competition among chains like Solana, Sui, and Algorand, all vying to host Polymarket. For Polygon, losing this key application, which contributes significantly to its gas fee revenue, would be a major setback. The real test for Polymarket is no longer attracting users but proving it can provide a stable, reliable trading environment that retains them.

Odaily星球日报8 min fa

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Odaily星球日报8 min fa

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit47 min fa

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit47 min fa

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit1 h fa

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片