Models Can Also "Nest"? MiniMax Releases M2.7: The First Domestic Large Model Deeply Involved in Self-Iteration

marsbitPubblicato 2026-03-18Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-18

Introduzione

Artificial intelligence is evolving from monthly updates to self-evolution. On March 18, MiniMax released its first new model version deeply involved in its own iteration—MiniMax M2.7. This marks a new stage in model development: large models are no longer solely trained by human programmers but have begun to "train themselves." The core breakthrough of MiniMax M2.7 lies in its strong autonomous construction capability. It can independently build complex Agent Harness (intelligent agent testing frameworks) and, relying on underlying capabilities such as Agent Teams, complex Skills, and Tool Search tools, complete highly complex productivity tasks autonomously. In simple terms, M2.7 is not just a smarter conversational agent but also a "digital engineer" capable of self-diagnosis and self-optimization. This "self-participatory iteration" model will significantly enhance the model’s logical reasoning and tool invocation accuracy when facing unknown complex tasks. Currently, this self-evolving MiniMax M2.7 model has been fully launched on the MiniMax Agent platform and open platform. As large models begin to deeply participate in their own "growth" process, the ceiling of AI may be raised once again.

The evolution speed of artificial intelligence is transitioning from "monthly updates" to "self-evolution." On March 18, MiniMax officially released its first new version model deeply involved in iterating itself—MiniMax M2.7. This marks a new stage in model development: large models are no longer solely fed by human programmers but have begun to learn to "guide themselves."

According to reports, the core breakthrough of MiniMax M2.7 lies in its powerful autonomous construction capability. It can independently build complex Agent Harness (intelligent agent testing frameworks) and, relying on underlying capabilities such as Agent Teams (intelligent agent collaboration), complex Skills, and Tool Search tool, independently complete highly complex productivity tasks.

Simply put, M2.7 is not just a smarter conversationalist but also a "digital engineer" capable of self-diagnosis and self-optimization. This "self-participatory iteration" model will significantly enhance the model's logical reasoning limits and tool invocation accuracy when facing unknown complex tasks.

Currently, this MiniMax M2.7 model, equipped with self-evolution genes, has been fully launched on the MiniMax Agent platform and open platform. As large models begin to deeply participate in their own "growth" process, the ceiling of AI may be raised once again.

Meanwhile, the AI computing power and application market are also seeing frequent developments. LuChen Technology announced the completion of a Series B financing round worth hundreds of millions of yuan, with its overseas revenue share soaring to 79%; meanwhile, due to a surge in call volumes, some of Alibaba Cloud's AI computing power products have reportedly seen price increases. Amid the interplay of technological iteration and market fluctuations, the AI track in 2026 is becoming increasingly urgent and full of variables.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the name of the new model released by MiniMax that is capable of deep self-iteration?

AThe new model is called MiniMax M2.7.

QWhat is the core breakthrough of the MiniMax M2.7 model according to the article?

AIts core breakthrough is its strong autonomous construction capability, allowing it to build complex Agent Harness and complete highly complex productivity tasks independently.

QWhat specific abilities does the M2.7 model use to complete complex tasks?

AIt uses abilities such as Agent Teams (agent collaboration), complex Skills, and Tool Search tool to complete tasks.

QOn which platforms has the MiniMax M2.7 model been fully launched?

AIt has been fully launched on the MiniMax Agent platform and the open platform.

QBesides the MiniMax announcement, what other AI market dynamics are mentioned in the article?

AThe article mentions that LuChen Technology completed a Series B financing of hundreds of millions of yuan, and Alibaba Cloud increased prices for some AI computing products due to a surge in usage.

Letture associate

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Charlie Munger's Calculated "Loss-Making Account" Many traders, drawn to speculative tools like futures contracts, often face repeated failures. As the article notes, unless one is a genius, such instruments should be avoided for long-term profit-seeking. Similarly, the practice of short selling is viewed with caution. The author firmly states a policy of not shorting, even when bearish, preferring to simply wait. The core reason? Successful short selling requires exceptionally difficult conditions to profit. Legendary investors Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger have themselves reflected on painful short-selling experiences. Munger highlights two critical flaws in the mathematical logic of shorting: 1. Asymmetrical Risk/Reward: A long position has a maximum loss of 100% but unlimited upside. A short position caps profit at 100% (if a stock falls to zero) but carries theoretically unlimited loss potential. 2. The "Promoter" Problem: Fraudulent or struggling companies can prolong their decline. As Munger said, "You can run out of money before the promoter runs out of ideas," meaning short sellers may be forced to cover positions at a loss before the company's true fate unfolds. The article cites Stanley Druckenmiller, a famed hedge fund manager. He once shorted 12 companies that all eventually went bankrupt. However, intense market rallies forced him to cover his positions within three weeks, resulting in massive losses—$200 million of his capital plus an additional $600 million. He concluded he likely never made money shorting in his career. His experience perfectly illustrates Munger's points: facing unlimited losses and being wiped out before being proven right. The conclusion is clear: for most investors, complex instruments like short selling and derivatives are not viable paths to stable, long-term gains. Self-reflection is advised before repeatedly wasting time and capital on such speculative strategies.

marsbit53 min fa

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

marsbit53 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片