Millions Of RLUSD Are Gone Forever After This Major Ripple Burn

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-03-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-14

Introduzione

Ripple's stablecoin RLUSD has undergone significant supply reductions through a series of major burn transactions. A total of 25 million tokens were recently burned in a single transaction, following earlier burns of 8 million, 3 million, and multiple 15 million and 10 million token removals across both the Ethereum and XRP Ledger blockchains. These burns permanently reduce circulation by sending tokens to inaccessible addresses. However, this activity is part of RLUSD's reserve-backed model, where tokens are burned upon redemption to ensure the circulating supply never exceeds dollar reserves. Despite the burns, larger minting events—including recent issuances of 29 million, 14.9 million, 6 million, and 3 million RLUSD—have supported the stablecoin's growth. RLUSD's market cap now exceeds $1.56 billion, reflecting its expanding adoption since launch.

Ripple’s dollar-pegged stablecoin RLUSD is seeing a period of supply reductions, with millions of tokens permanently removed from circulation in a series of burn transactions tied to Ripple’s treasury activity. Blockchain trackers monitoring RLUSD activity show that multiple large burns have taken place recently, eliminating tens of millions of tokens from supply. The most recent burn alone accounted for 25 million tokens in one move, but that figure only tells part of the story.

Latest Burn Eliminates 25 Million RLUSD

The most recent transaction flagged by the Ripple Stablecoin Tracker on X saw 25 million RLUSD burned at the RLUSD treasury, the headline figure in what has been a multi-step reduction of the stablecoin’s circulating supply in recent days. Stablecoin burns permanently remove tokens from circulation by sending them to an inaccessible address, making them impossible to recover or spend again. In the case of RLUSD, the transaction effectively wiped out 25 million tokens from the total supply. That alone would have been notable, but multiple additional burns preceded it.

Before the latest 25 million token burn, Ripple had already destroyed several million RLUSD in separate transactions. These burns were carried out on both the Ethereum blockchain and the XRP Ledger, which are the two blockchains that RLUSD runs on.

Ripple Stablecoin Tracker on X recorded a transaction in which 8 million RLUSD were permanently removed from circulation. That burn did not occur in isolation. It followed another earlier transaction that destroyed 3 million RLUSD, continuing the pattern of supply reductions tied to Ripple’s treasury activity.

Looking further back, the sequence becomes even more notable. Prior to those two burns, the tracker had already flagged a 15 million RLUSD burn, followed by another 15 million RLUSD removal on the Ethereum blockchain. Before that, a separate transaction that eliminated 10 million RLUSD from circulation on the XRP Ledger.

Why These Burns Keep Happening

The volume of burns in recent days is not a red flag but a feature. RLUSD operates under a reserve-backed model in which every token in circulation corresponds to a dollar held in reserve. Ripple burns the tokens to guarantee the circulating supply never exceeds what is backed when holders redeem their RLUSD.

Burns of this scale would only become a concern if they consistently outweighed the number of tokens being created. That does not appear to be the case with RLUSD. Updates from the Ripple Stablecoin Tracker account show that the recent burns have been accompanied by even larger minting activity. In the past few days alone, the RLUSD treasury minted 3 million RLUSD, 6 million RLUSD, 29 million RLUSD, and 14.9 million RLUSD, all of which entered circulation on the Ethereum network.

RLUSD itself has continued growing since its launch and has steadily climbed in size, with the stablecoin now holding a market capitalization of more than $1.56 billion.

Price recovers again | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the total amount of RLUSD tokens burned in the most recent transaction mentioned in the article?

AThe most recent transaction burned 25 million RLUSD tokens.

QOn which two blockchains does the RLUSD stablecoin operate?

ARLUSD operates on both the Ethereum blockchain and the XRP Ledger.

QAccording to the article, why are these large-scale burns of RLUSD not a cause for concern?

AThe burns are not a concern because they are a feature of the reserve-backed model to ensure the circulating supply is always backed by dollars in reserve, and recent minting activity has been even larger than the burns.

QWhat is the current market capitalization of the RLUSD stablecoin as stated in the article?

AThe RLUSD stablecoin currently has a market capitalization of more than $1.56 billion.

QWhat mechanism is used to permanently remove RLUSD tokens from circulation?

ATokens are permanently removed from circulation by sending them to an inaccessible address in a process called burning, making them impossible to recover or spend again.

Letture associate

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手1 h fa

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手1 h fa

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手1 h fa

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片