Metaplanet clears issuance of dividend-paying shares for overseas institutions

cointelegraphPubblicato 2025-12-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-22

Introduzione

Metaplanet, Japan's largest corporate Bitcoin holder, has approved a major capital restructuring to issue dividend-paying preferred shares targeting international institutional investors. The approved measures allow the company to reclassify capital reserves, double its authorized preferred shares, and introduce new floating and periodic dividend structures. The Class A shares will offer monthly adjustable-rate dividends, while Class B shares will provide quarterly payouts and include investor protections like a 10-year call option and an IPO put clause. This shift enables Metaplanet to raise global capital by offering Bitcoin exposure through traditional equity instruments, rather than direct BTC holdings or common stock. The company, which holds 30,823 BTC ($2.75B), is expanding its reach and will soon trade in the U.S. via OTC markets.

Metaplanet approved an overhaul of its capital structure on Monday, allowing Japan’s largest corporate Bitcoin holder to raise funds through dividend-paying preferred shares aimed at institutional investors.

Investors approved five proposals that collectively expand the Metaplanet’s ability to issue preferred shares, introduce new dividend mechanics and open participation to overseas institutional capital, said Dylan LeClair, the company’s Bitcoin strategy director.

The approved measures include reclassifying capital reserves to allow for preferred share dividends and potential buybacks, doubling the authorized number of Class A and Class B preferred shares and amending dividend structures to introduce floating and periodic payouts.

In addition, Metaplanet cleared the issuance of Class B preferred shares to international institutional investors.

Metaplanet held about 30,823 Bitcoin (BTC) at press time, worth $2.75 billion, according to Bitcoin Treasuries. This makes the company the biggest corporate Bitcoin holder in Asia, and the fourth-biggest in the world.

Source: Dylan LeClair

Preferred shares and institutional access

The approved proposals mark a shift away from a pure growth-through-dilution approach to a more traditional markets approach, where income-producing securities coexist with a Bitcoin-focused balance sheet strategy.

Rather than offering direct Bitcoin yield, Metaplanet is using preferred equity to package exposure to its corporate Bitcoin holdings in a format familiar to institutions.

One of the most notable changes is the amendment for the company's Class A preferred shares to adopt a monthly, floating-rate dividend structure known as the “Metaplanet Adjustable Rate Security.”

This design allows investors to receive regular income, which aligns with the institutional need for predictable cash flows.

Class B preferred shares were also amended to include quarterly dividends, a 10-year issuer call at 130% of face value and an investor put option if the company does not complete an initial public offering (IPO) within a year.

Related: MSCI’s Bitcoin snub is like penalizing Chevron for oil: Strategy CEO

This means that Metaplanet can buy the shares back after 10 years at a premium price, while investors have the right to exit early if the company does not go public in a year.

These features mirror protections commonly seen in private credit and structured equity markets, reducing downside risk for long term providers of capital.

Furthermore, by targeting overseas institutions, Metaplanet allows global investors who may want Bitcoin exposure without directly holding spot BTC or volatile common stock.

Metaplanet expands to global markets

Metaplanet is one of the most closely watched Bitcoin-focused public companies in Asia.

It’s often compared to US-based corporate Bitcoin treasury models, despite operating in Japan's regulatory and capital markets environment.

The company’s approach highlights how non-US companies are adapting Bitcoin strategies to local market constraints while still pursuing global capital.

On Friday, the company announced that it was set to begin trading in the US on the over-the-counter market through American Depositary Receipts. The announcement came months after the company established a subsidiary in Miami.

Magazine: Koreans ‘pump’ alts after Upbit hack, China BTC mining surge: Asia Express

Domande pertinenti

QWhat did Metaplanet approve regarding its capital structure and who is the target investor for the new shares?

AMetaplanet approved an overhaul of its capital structure to raise funds through dividend-paying preferred shares aimed at institutional investors, specifically opening participation to overseas institutional capital.

QHow many Bitcoin does Metaplanet hold and what is its ranking among global corporate holders?

AMetaplanet holds 30,823 Bitcoin, worth $2.75 billion, making it the largest corporate Bitcoin holder in Asia and the fourth-largest in the world.

QWhat is the new dividend structure for Metaplanet's Class A preferred shares and what need does it address?

AThe Class A preferred shares adopt a monthly, floating-rate dividend structure called the 'Metaplanet Adjustable Rate Security,' which provides regular income to align with the institutional need for predictable cash flows.

QWhat key features were added to Metaplanet's Class B preferred shares for investor protection?

AClass B preferred shares include quarterly dividends, a 10-year issuer call option at 130% of face value, and an investor put option if the company fails to complete an IPO within one year.

QHow is Metaplanet expanding its access to global markets beyond Japan?

AMetaplanet is expanding to global markets by issuing Class B preferred shares to international institutional investors and beginning to trade in the US over-the-counter market through American Depositary Receipts, following the establishment of a Miami subsidiary.

Letture associate

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手5 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手5 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit7 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit7 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手9 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手9 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit10 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit10 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片