Memory Card Prices Double in Four Months: How Long Will the Surge Last?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-04-16Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-16

Introduzione

NAND flash memory prices have entered a rapid upward cycle, with consumer-grade storage products like microSD cards seeing significant retail price increases. For example, a SanDisk Extreme 128GB microSD card rose from $17 in October 2025 to nearly $40 by February 2026—a 130% surge in under four months. This price surge is driven by structural shifts in the NAND market, primarily due to soaring demand from AI data centers. These large-scale buyers are securing the majority of NAND wafer supply through long-term contracts, leaving limited inventory for the consumer market. According to TrendForce, NAND contract prices rose 55–60% in Q1 2026, with enterprise SSD prices climbing 53–58%. Retail prices rose even more sharply due to constrained supply in the distribution channel. Unlike the 2016–2017 price cycle caused by production transitions, the current spike is demand-led. AI data centers are consuming NAND capacity at an unprecedented rate, with 2026 demand growth estimated at 20–22% against supply growth of only 15–17%. Manufacturers are prioritizing high-margin enterprise products over consumer-grade storage, further tightening retail availability. New production capacity from major suppliers like Samsung, Micron, and Kioxia is not expected until late 2027 or 2028. Until then, consumer storage prices are likely to remain high, with no significant price relief anticipated in the near term.

Since the beginning of this year, NAND flash prices have entered a new round of rapid increases, with retail prices of consumer storage products being the first to be affected. In October 2025, a SanDisk Extreme 128GB microSD card was sold for $17 on Amazon. By February of this year, the price of the same card had risen to nearly $40. In less than four months, the price increased by 130%.

First, it is important to clarify the difference between memory modules (RAM) and memory cards, as they are not the same type of product. Memory modules (RAM) are temporary storage inside computers, used for reading and writing data when programs are running; data is lost when power is cut off. Memory cards (such as microSD cards) are external expandable storage used for long-term preservation of files like photos and videos; data is not lost when power is cut off. The price increase discussed in this article refers to the latter—memory cards and the underlying NAND flash chips.

The continuous rise in memory card prices is driven by a systemic repricing of the entire NAND flash market. The starting point of this repricing is AI data centers competing for the same wafers.

Contract Prices Rose 50%, but Retail Prices Rose 130% by the Time They Reach You

First, let’s discuss what is happening.

Global NAND flash contract prices began climbing rapidly at the end of last year. According to a February report by market research firm TrendForce, overall NAND contract prices in the first quarter of 2026 increased by approximately 55–60% compared to the fourth quarter of last year, with enterprise SSD prices rising by 53–58%, setting a new record for quarterly growth. TrendForce also predicted that overall NAND contract prices would rise by another 70–75% in the second quarter.

These numbers represent the bulk contract unit prices agreed upon between large customers and do not directly equate to the retail prices on e-commerce platforms. However, retail prices on the consumer side have risen even more sharply than contract prices. The rightmost bar in Figure 1, showing a 130% increase, represents the actual price shock felt by ordinary consumers.

Why are retail price increases far exceeding contract price increases? Because the consumer market is a "residual allocation market." When NAND manufacturers set delivery plans, they prioritize fulfilling orders for large customers with long-term framework agreements, including AI data center operators and hyperscale cloud service providers. Only after these orders are fulfilled do the remaining inventories enter the distribution channels of the consumer market. With supply compressed, the spot market has almost no buffer capacity against price increases, leading to steeper retail price hikes than contract price hikes.

Kingston has publicly confirmed that its procurement cost for NAND wafers has increased by 246% compared to a year ago. This is a cost shock at the raw material level, which is ultimately passed down to consumers through product prices.

How AI Is Pushing Up the Price of a Memory Card

There are two key points in this graph worth highlighting.

The first is around October 2025, when relatively low-priced memory cards were available on the market. That period marked the end of the previous cycle of oversupply. From 2023 to 2024, major storage manufacturers accumulated large inventories amid weakening demand, leading to continuously declining prices. Photographers, creators, and gamers took advantage of this window to stock up on memory cards at historically low prices.

The second key point is the fourth quarter of 2025. Samsung, Kioxia, Micron, and SK Hynix successively announced production cuts and price increases, completely reversing the situation in a short period. Samsung raised prices for enterprise customers by over 100%, while Kioxia explicitly stated that its entire 2026 production capacity had been pre-sold to large customers, effectively cutting off supply to the consumer market.

Since then, retail prices for memory cards have been climbing steadily and are expected to reach the $50–$60 range by mid-2026, with no window for a price correction throughout the year. This is not market speculation but a structural adjustment in the supply allocation mechanism. Before AI data centers became the top-priority buyers in the NAND market, consumer and enterprise products participated more or less equally in capacity allocation. Now, the consumer end is at the very bottom of the allocation chain.

This Time, It’s Completely Different from 2017

The NAND industry experiences a price cycle approximately every three to four years. The last significant price increase occurred in 2016–2017 and lasted nearly two years. That round was triggered by the technological transition from 2D NAND to 3D NAND. The new stacking process slowed effective output during the yield ramp-up phase, tightening supply and driving up costs. However, once 3D NAND production lines stabilized for various manufacturers, Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron simultaneously expanded production significantly. Inventories quickly shifted from shortage to surplus, and prices plummeted in early 2018.

This time, the driving force is entirely different, and the path to recovery will also be截然不同.

According to TrendForce data, global NAND demand growth is expected to reach 20–22% in 2026, while supply-side growth is only 15–17%. The absolute gap is not large, but in a market of this scale, a few percentage points of supply-demand disparity can trigger extremely sharp price reactions. More importantly, this gap is not caused by technical issues but by a structural shift in demand. AI data centers are consuming NAND capacity in a sustained, massive, and high-priority manner, and the scale of this demand has no ceiling.

New production capacity to alleviate supply constraints will not arrive until late 2027 to 2028. Samsung’s NAND production lines at its P4 facility in Pyeongtaek, Gyeonggi Province; Micron’s new wafer fab in Idaho, USA; and Kioxia’s expansion of its Iwate factory all point to this timeframe. 2026 is the year with the largest supply-demand gap, not the turning point for prices.

Manufacturers Aren’t Lacking Capacity; They’re Actively Selling It to the Highest Bidder

The following graph illustrates the essential mechanism behind this price surge. In the NAND industry’s revenue structure, the share of enterprise products (AI data center SSDs, general server storage) is rapidly expanding. According to comprehensive estimates by industry agencies, the share of enterprise products in overall NAND revenue has risen from about 45% in 2024 to about 62% in 2026, while the share of the consumer and client market has been compressed from 55% to about 38%.

The logic driving this shift is straightforward: for the same wafer area, producing enterprise-grade high-density QLC SSDs yields 3–5 times the unit profit compared to producing consumer-grade memory cards. Capacity allocation by manufacturers like Kioxia and Samsung follows the principle of maximizing commercial利益, allocating the best wafers to the highest bidders.

This mechanism also has a hidden effect. As available inventory in the consumer market decreases, distributors and retailers accelerate their stocking pace to hedge against future price increases, further accelerating inventory drawdown on the consumer end and creating a self-reinforcing cycle of price hikes.

For consumers, memory card prices will remain high for a considerable period. This is not due to a lack of wafer capacity but because the allocation priority of the consumer market has been systematically lowered. Only when the construction pace of AI computing infrastructure slows down will excess wafer capacity return to the consumer product supply chain, but that won’t happen until after 2027.

The SD card in your camera and the world’s largest AI data center are using the same wafer. Now you know who wins.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason for the sharp price increase in memory cards over the past four months?

AThe price surge is primarily driven by structural demand shifts, with AI data centers consuming NAND flash capacity at a high priority, leaving limited supply for the retail consumer market.

QHow does the retail price increase of memory cards compare to the NAND flash contract price rise?

AThe retail price increased by about 130%, which is significantly higher than the contract price rise of 55-60% in Q1 2026, due to the consumer market being a 'residual allocation market' with minimal buffer against supply constraints.

QWhy is the current NAND price cycle different from the one in 2016-2017?

AThe 2016-2017 cycle was caused by technical transitions (2D to 3D NAND) and resolved with improved yields and expanded production, while the current cycle is driven by structural AI demand, with no quick supply fix until 2027-2028.

QWhat role do AI data centers play in the NAND market supply chain?

AAI data centers are the highest-priority buyers, securing most of the NAND产能 through long-term contracts, which reduces the allocation for consumer products like memory cards and pushes retail prices higher.

QWhen is the NAND supply shortage expected to ease, and why?

AThe shortage is expected to ease around late 2027 to 2028, when new产能 expansions from major manufacturers like Samsung, Micron, and Kioxia become operational, increasing overall supply.

Letture associate

Interview with Robinhood Executive: Meme + Tokenized US Stocks as "Barbell" Customer Acquisition Strategy, All Business Lines Achieve Hundreds of Millions in Revenue

Interview with Robinhood executive Johann Kerbrat reveals the company's "barbell" customer acquisition strategy for its new Robinhood Chain, combining meme tokens with tokenized stocks. Three weeks after mainnet launch, the chain has seen over $3B in weekly DEX volume and 105M transactions. Kerbrat explains the logic behind the permissionless chain: meme tokens attract DeFi users, while tokenized real-world assets (RWA), currently over 90 US stocks and ETFs accessible in 120+ countries, serve global users. The goal is to bring Robinhood's 27 million funded accounts on-chain by simplifying DeFi with a user-friendly interface, exemplified by features like Robinhood Earn which offers yield without requiring wallet management. Built on Arbitrum's technology stack for its speed, low cost, and Ethereum's security, the chain focuses on financial products like Earn, spot trading, and perpetuals. Kerbrat downplays direct competition with platforms like Base, emphasizing the goal of expanding the overall market for on-chain assets. He details selective partnerships (e.g., Morpho, Lighter) based on compliance, unique UX, and differentiation. While regulatory clarity is pending for US perpetuals, the expansion continues via Bitstamp in Europe. Finally, Kerbrat positions Robinhood as a "super app" integrating stocks, options, crypto, banking, and AI trading, with all major business lines generating hundreds of millions in revenue. For the chain, current priority is driving adoption over maximizing gas fee revenue.

marsbit1 h fa

Interview with Robinhood Executive: Meme + Tokenized US Stocks as "Barbell" Customer Acquisition Strategy, All Business Lines Achieve Hundreds of Millions in Revenue

marsbit1 h fa

Fidelity Q3 Report: BTC, ETH, and SOL Continue to Build Bottoms; How Much Further Will This Crypto Bear Market Go?

Fidelity's Q3 Crypto Signal Report analyzes the current bear market, noting Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Solana (SOL) are in a prolonged bottoming phase. Key indicators like the weighted Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL) have turned negative (-0.01), signaling the market is slightly below its aggregate cost basis, with BTC acting as the primary stabilizing asset. BTC's dominance has risen to 68%, indicating a lack of capital rotation to other digital assets. Performance has been weak across the board, with BTC, ETH, and SOL down significantly year-to-date. Market sentiment is depressed, exacerbated by substantial outflows from spot ETPs and a challenging macro environment. The report compares the current ~203-day downtrend to historical ~300-day bottoming cycles, suggesting the process may be two-thirds complete, with late 2026 as a potential timeframe to monitor. For Bitcoin, NUPL at 0.09 indicates cautious sentiment, while momentum signals remain negative. The Yardstick metric points to potential undervaluation relative to network security (hashrate). Ethereum's NUPL is deep in the "capitulation" zone at -0.43, a historically positive signal for future returns, though its momentum and network fee revenue are negative. Solana shows the deepest NUPL at -0.72 but demonstrates relative resilience in on-chain activity and stablecoin transfer volume. The report concludes that while several metrics are near historical capitulation levels, a definitive market bottom has not yet been established. The path forward likely involves continued consolidation, with BTC's relative strength and fundamental on-chain usage for ETH and SOL providing key areas for investor observation.

marsbit1 h fa

Fidelity Q3 Report: BTC, ETH, and SOL Continue to Build Bottoms; How Much Further Will This Crypto Bear Market Go?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片