Matrixport Research: After Months of Caution, Bitcoin Enters a Phase of Structural Gameplay

MatrixportPubblicato 2025-12-26Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-26

Introduzione

Bitcoin has entered a new structural phase after months of cautious and range-bound trading, shifting from a one-sided downward trend to a more balanced risk-reward dynamic. Despite recent underperformance against other assets and continued low volatility, key indicators suggest a potential inflection point. The largest-ever Bitcoin options expiration on December 26, 2025, with $17.2 billion in call options and $6.2 billion in puts, is a critical event. While calls are concentrated above $100,000 (a level difficult to reach near-term), puts clustered around $85,000 may lead to intensified price action around that level. Post-expiration, market sentiment may begin improving as risk budgets reset, ETF flows potentially return, and institutional rebalancing occurs in January. Although 2026 may remain challenging for long-only strategies, tactical opportunities are emerging as the market transitions from “downside risk dominance” to a phase of “limited downside but catalysts still needed.”

"Downside risks are marginally limited, but upside still requires catalysts; a critical window is approaching."

Since mid-October, Bitcoin has continued to decline, with market sentiment clearly turning cautious. As the market once again discusses the "four-year cycle," some traders speculate that 2026 may still be in a phase of pressure. However, recent structural changes suggest that the market is entering a new phase different from a one-sided decline.

Over the past few months, Bitcoin has operated in an environment of converging volatility, deleveraging, and a lack of risk appetite, with prices under sustained pressure. However, from the perspective of derivative positions, ETF fund flows, and key technical indicators, the internal structure of the market has begun to change. As the largest Bitcoin options expiration in history approaches, the distribution of strike prices is becoming an important window to observe market pressure and potential opportunities.

Low Volatility and De-risking in Parallel: Year-End Market Maintains Range-Bound Volatility

In recent months, Bitcoin's implied volatility has continued to converge, with prices likely trading within the range of $70,000 to $100,000. On one hand, there is a short-term lack of catalysts that could drive the market significantly away from this range, and event risks are relatively limited. On the other hand, the Federal Reserve's dovish stance may not meet market expectations as previously anticipated, limiting the overall upward momentum of risk assets.

At the same time, Bitcoin has significantly underperformed other major assets, making it more likely to be used as a tool for "tax-loss selling" by multi-asset investors at year-end to offset realized gains in other markets, thereby creating additional selling pressure on prices. Coupled with the impact of the sharp decline in early October, many trading teams are still digesting earlier losses and have limited willingness to expand risk exposure before the end of the year. Against the backdrop of constrained risk appetite, increasing positions and capital allocation have become more cautious, and the market as a whole maintains a state of low volatility and range-bound trading.

Options Expiration and Risk Budget Reset: Structural Inflection Point Window Approaches

On December 26, 2025, Bitcoin will witness the largest options expiration in history, with approximately $17.2 billion in call options and $6.2 billion in put options set to settle. From the distribution of strike prices, call options are mainly concentrated above $100,000, making it difficult to reach in the short term. In contrast, a significant number of put option open interest is clustered around $85,000, making this area more likely to become a zone of repeated price fluctuations around the expiration date.

Historical experience shows that year-end markets are typically more conservative, while after the new year, with capital reallocation and risk budget recovery, sentiment reversals often exceed expectations. The current technical structure is also changing: downside momentum is marginally slowing, but upward momentum has not yet formed a clear consensus. Against this backdrop, the market may be transitioning from a "downside risk dominance" phase to a gameplay stage of "limited downside but upside still requiring catalysts." After the options expiration is completed, position pressure is expected to be released temporarily, and coupled with potential ETF fund inflows and risk appetite recovery in January, there is room for improvement in market sentiment.

Overall, although 2026 may still pose challenges for long-term one-sided long positions, the research focus has begun to shift toward tactical opportunities with gradually improving risk-reward structures. Bitcoin's underperformance against other major assets for several consecutive weeks, combined with the calendar switch effect from year-end to the new year, may cause related opportunities to emerge earlier than market expectations. The significance of the December 26 options expiration event lies not in the mechanical settlement of the contracts themselves, but in the fact that after this node, market participants often begin to reposition in advance for January's fund inflows and risk appetite recovery. This phase may become an important window for observing structural changes and sentiment inflection points.

Some of the above views are from Matrix on Target. Contact us to obtain the full Matrix on Target report.

Disclaimer: The market is risky, and investment requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset trading may carry significant risks and instability. Investment decisions should be made after careful consideration of personal circumstances and consultation with financial professionals. Matrixport is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided in this content.

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main argument presented in the Matrixport research report regarding the current state of the Bitcoin market?

AThe report argues that after months of cautious sentiment, the Bitcoin market is entering a new phase of 'structural game' characterized by limited downside risk but a lack of immediate upside catalysts, moving away from a simple one-sided downtrend.

QAccording to the report, what key event on December 26th, 2025, is significant for the Bitcoin market?

AThe key event is the expiration of the largest-ever Bitcoin options, with approximately $17.2 billion in call options and $6.2 billion in put options set to settle, which is seen as a potential structural inflection point.

QWhat two factors are identified as contributing to Bitcoin's low volatility and range-bound trading between $70,000 and $100,000?

AThe two factors are: 1) A short-term lack of catalysts to push the price significantly out of the range, and 2) The Federal Reserve's potential dovishness falling short of market expectations, limiting upward momentum for risk assets.

QHow does the report describe the potential impact of the new year (January) on market dynamics?

AThe report states that with the new year comes capital reallocation and restored risk budgets, which historically leads to a rapid reversal in sentiment that often exceeds expectations, potentially bringing ETF fund flows and risk appetite recovery.

QWhat is the significance of the $85,000 price level mentioned in the context of the options expiration?

AThe $85,000 level is significant because a substantial amount of put option open interest is concentrated there, making it a key area for price contention and repeated博弈 (gameplay) around the expiration date.

Letture associate

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手3 h fa

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手3 h fa

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbit3 h fa

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbit3 h fa

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手4 h fa

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手4 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare O

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di O1 exchange (O) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente O1 exchangeO.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva O1 exchange (O)Dopo aver acquistato O1 exchange (O), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia O1 exchange (O)Scambia facilmente O1 exchange (O) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

70 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2026.06.19Aggiornato il 2026.06.29

Come comprare O

Come comprare PROS

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Pharos (PROS) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente PharosPROS.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Pharos (PROS)Dopo aver acquistato Pharos (PROS), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Pharos (PROS)Scambia facilmente Pharos (PROS) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

69 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2026.06.22Aggiornato il 2026.06.29

Come comprare PROS

Cosa è VERONA

I. Introduzione al Progetto VERONA è una blockchain costruita per tutti, ovunque attraverso l'astrazione della catena. Utilizzando il suo livello di astrazione generalizzato, VERONA si distingue integrando funzionalità blockchain complesse, come conti, firme e interoperabilità, direttamente a livello di protocollo. Questo approccio consente di interagire con le applicazioni blockchain senza la necessità di comprendere le tecnologie sottostanti.1) Informazioni di Base Nome:VERONA(VERONA)III. Link Correlati Link al sito ufficiale:https://xion.burnt.com/ Whitepaper:https://xion.burnt.com/whitepaper.pdf Esploratori:https://explorer.burnt.com/ Social Media: https://x.com/burnt_xion Nota: L'introduzione al progetto proviene dai materiali pubblicati o forniti dal team ufficiale del progetto, che è solo a scopo di riferimento e non costituisce consulenza per investimenti. HTX non si assume responsabilità per eventuali perdite dirette o indirette risultanti.

95 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2026.06.22Aggiornato il 2026.06.22

Cosa è VERONA

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di A A sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片