Market Plunge, But These Crypto OGs Are Still 'Topping Up Their Faith'

marsbitPubblicato 2026-02-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-06

Introduzione

Summary: On February 6, Bitcoin plunged 15.48% to $60,000, marking its largest single-day drop since the FTX collapse. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index hit 9, indicating "extreme fear" and a new low since the 2022 bear market. Despite widespread panic, several crypto veterans reaffirmed their conviction. Michael Saylor encouraged buying Bitcoin as a form of support. The founder of Base emphasized long-term commitment to building. Lily Liu, President of the Solana Foundation, argued that blockchain's core purpose is financialization, stressing the importance of protecting liquidity unity. She criticized the "Web3 narrative" as overly simplistic and called for creating new markets rather than relying on speculative narratives. Balaji expressed strong bullishness, stating that "code-based order" is rising as "rules-based order" collapses, making short-term prices irrelevant. He emphasized the need for on-chain companies and internet-native systems. The founder of Helius shared similar optimism, advocating for filtering out "tourists" to improve signal-to-noise ratio in the space. Linda Xie shared her experience of a 75% drawdown in 2018, advising against emotionally-driven decisions and emphasizing holding assets with strong fundamental belief. Crypto influencer神鱼 (Shenyu) succinctly stated: "1 BTC = 1 BTC." Overall, these leaders urge perseverance, focus on fundamentals, and long-term belief in crypto's transformative potential despite market volatility.

Editor's Note: On February 6th, Bitcoin fell to a low of $60,000, plummeting 15.48% in a single day, marking its largest single-day drop since the FTX collapse. At the same time, the Crypto Fear & Greed Index dropped to 9, indicating a state of 'Extreme Fear' in the market, hitting a new low since the 2022 bear market.

However, as pessimism spreads, many veteran Builders and thought leaders in the crypto world are voicing a different perspective. This 'Crypto Faith Topping-Up List' compiles their thoughts and perseverance amidst the storm. Perhaps it can offer you a sliver of solace and direction to move forward during this market winter.

Michael Saylor:

If you want to give me a birthday present, buy yourself some Bitcoin!

Base Founder:

13 years have passed, and I'm not going anywhere.

There's still so much to build.

Solana Foundation President LilyLiu:

Blockchain was, is, and always will be financial technology. Their core purpose is financialization.

This is also why, when designing a chain, protecting the unity of liquidity is more important than almost anything else.

I'm glad the misguided focus on things like 'chain games' is finally over.

More broadly, the 'read write own' / 'Web3 narrative' is essentially too skeuomorphic and, to be honest, a bit intellectually lazy. New technology is never as simple as 'put something on-chain, and voilà—everything changes'; you must truly create new markets.

The old narrative was more of a fig leaf, used to justify VCs pouring money into various unnecessary infrastructures, hoping to create a private asset that could become 'magic internet money.'

The more projects try to attract prices through narrative packaging and take a share of the liquidity from the 'wild west' of the internet, the harder the 'narrative justification machine' has to work, shaping everything into the 'great third wave of applications'—'everything you do today can now earn you money.'

The reality is, the opportunities are indeed huge, far beyond what even our most creative minds can imagine, but not in the way they've been described over the past few years.

The blockchain journey has always been about finance: providing open financial infrastructure for anyone and everyone on the internet.

This enables capital formation and internet innovation to happen anywhere in the world, allowing the resulting innovation and progress to truly take root. Open finance brings greater economic freedom, and economic freedom brings individual sovereignty and autonomy.

Balaji:

I have never been more bullish on cryptocurrency than I am now.

Because the 'rules-based order' is collapsing, and the 'code-based order' is rising. So short-term prices simply don't matter.

As the international legal system disintegrates, we need not only on-chain money but also on-chain companies. As the post-war order unravels, we similarly need a 'post-internet order.' Nations will fail, and networks will replace them.

We need internet capitalism, we need internet democracy, we need internet privacy.

So we need cryptocurrency.

Helius Founder:

I have never been more confident about the future of cryptocurrency than I am now.

Let the tourists bleed out and leave.

We need to increase the signal-to-noise ratio in this space, and this will achieve that goal.

Trillion

Linda Xie:

I know the current market environment is tough. I hope these experiences can be helpful to some. For me, the personal and professional low point was in January 2018, after launching a crypto liquidity fund, when the market fell 90% that year. Our fund experienced a maximum drawdown of a humiliating 75%, meaning the fund needed to quadruple just to break even.

At the time, many investors chose to trust us (this was after about 1,000 fundraising meetings), some of whom I deeply respected, and I felt I had let them down; some investors even yelled at me over the phone. I was extremely worried about what I had gotten everyone into, including employees. I had also invested almost all of my personal savings.

But we stuck to the direction we truly believed in, and it eventually paid off years later (currently delivering about 4x DPI for investors). Hold onto assets you genuinely believe in fundamentally, and don't make any extreme decisions driven by emotion.

Shenyu:

1btc = 1btc

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the significance of Bitcoin's price drop to $60,000 on February 6th?

AIt marked a 15.48% single-day drop, the largest since the FTX crash, and pushed the Crypto Fear & Greed Index to 9, indicating 'extreme fear' and a new low since the 2022 bear market.

QAccording to Solana Foundation's Lily Liu, what is the core purpose of blockchains?

ABlockchains are, and always will be, financial technology. Their core purpose is financialization, providing open financial infrastructure to anyone on the internet to enable capital formation and innovation globally.

QWhat is Balaji's main argument for being extremely bullish on cryptocurrency despite short-term price movements?

AHe believes the 'rules-based order' is collapsing and a 'code-based order' is rising. As international law and the post-war order disintegrate, there is a need for on-chain money, companies, and new systems like internet capitalism and democracy, which cryptocurrency enables.

QWhat personal experience did Linda Xie share to help others during the difficult market?

AShe shared that her crypto liquidity fund launched in Jan 2018 experienced a 90% market drop and a 75% drawdown, requiring a 4x return just to break even. By sticking to their convictions and not making emotional decisions, they eventually delivered about 4x DPI (Distributed to Paid-In Capital) to investors.

QWhat common sentiment is expressed by multiple figures like Michael Saylor, the Base founder, and the Helius founder?

AThey express unwavering confidence and a long-term commitment to cryptocurrency. Saylor encourages buying Bitcoin, the Base founder states he's 'not going anywhere,' and the Helius founder says he's 'never been more confident,' suggesting that weak hands (tourists) leaving will improve the space.

Letture associate

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手8 min fa

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手8 min fa

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit35 min fa

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit35 min fa

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit50 min fa

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit50 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片