Mapping 2 reasons why ONDO’s current dip is only temporary

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-12-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-17

Introduzione

Despite a 10% price decline in the last 24 hours, driven by an $11 million liquidity outflow from the derivatives market, ONDO's current dip appears temporary. Key on-chain metrics remain strong: Total Value Locked (TVL) has surged to a record $1.93 billion, indicating sustained capital inflows from long-term investors. The protocol also generated $2.24 million in fees in December, reflecting growing usage. Additionally, Binance traders are showing renewed interest, with rising derivatives volume and a positive funding rate suggesting increasing demand for long positions. These factors point to underlying buying pressure and potential for a price rebound.

Ondo Finance, a blockchain platform focused on institutional-grade financial services, has come under pressure following the broader market decline over the past day.

Its native token, Ondo Finance [ONDO], fell by 10% within the last 24 hours.

Despite the pullback, investor activity and capital inflows continue to support the market. ONDO’s market capitalization stands at $1.27 billion, while the number of holders has climbed to an all-time high of 174,360.

Why ONDO fell

The recent decline appears to have been driven largely by a sharp liquidity outflow from the derivatives market.

Capital withdrawals over the past 24 hours reduced the circulating balance to roughly $110 million. Total capital outflows reached approximately $11 million, with nearly $1 million attributed to liquidations.

Sharp price declines accompanied by rising trading volume often indicate high-momentum selling. In ONDO’s case, trading volume increased by 46% to $204 million, according to CoinGlass.

This suggests that investors remain highly active, although the prevailing sentiment reflects bearish pressure in the short term.

On-chain liquidity continues to rise

On-chain inflows continued to strengthen. Notably, Total Value Locked on Ondo Finance has surged to an all-time high of $1.926 billion as of the 15th of December.

Rising TVL typically signals renewed capital inflows from long-term investors. This trend indicated that participants were increasingly committing funds to the protocol despite recent price weakness.

In simple terms, investors are depositing ONDO to earn yield through liquidity pools while positioning for potential future price appreciation. This strategy allows them to benefit from both yield generation and price upside.

In December alone, the protocol generated $2.24 million in fees, according to DeFiLlama.

Rising fees often reflects increased platform usage, signaling growing demand for ONDO and contributing to underlying buying pressure.

If on-chain activity continues to build at this pace, ONDO could benefit meaningfully from current market conditions, potentially supporting a price rebound.

Binance investors step in

Binance traders are also showing renewed interest, offering early signs of a possible price recovery.

CoinGlass data shows notable capital inflows on Binance, reflected in rising derivatives trading volume for ONDO.

With net volume turning bullish and Binance accounting for the second-largest Open Interest in ONDO derivatives at $22.23 million, market positioning suggests improving sentiment.

The broader derivatives market also reflects a bullish shift, with the funding rate rising to 0.0044%. This indicates stronger demand for long positions and continued capital inflows.

If this trend persists, ONDO’s prospects for a rebound remain tilted to the upside.


Final Thoughts

  • Off-chain data shows that ONDO has recorded a significant liquidity outflow of $11 million from the derivatives market.
  • On-chain data, however, shows rising liquidity inflows, with TVL reaching an all-time high of $1.926 billion.

Letture associate

Second Largest Whale Cuts Losses and Liquidates, Can AAVE Still Be Bought Amid Deepening Divisions?

The second-largest AAVE whale, excluding the project team, protocol contracts, and CEXs, has sold 230,000 AAVE tokens at a significant loss of $13.45 million, causing a 12% price drop. This sell-off reflects growing tensions between Aave Labs and the community over governance and fund allocation. The conflict began when Aave switched its default swap aggregator to Cow Swap, redirecting front-end transaction fees—previously sent to the Aave DAO treasury—to Aave Labs instead. Community members estimated this change could divert over $10 million annually from the DAO to the team, raising concerns about transparency and control. Aave Labs argued that front-end products are separate from the protocol and that the team has the right to monetize them. In response, a proposal was made to transfer control of Aave’s brand assets (domains, social accounts, etc.) to token holders. Founder Stani Kulechov opposed the proposal, citing its oversimplification of complex legal and operational issues, further escalating community backlash. The situation highlights deeper structural challenges in DeFi governance, where protocol value, team control, and community rights intersect. The outcome of an ongoing snapshot vote on the proposal may determine AAVE’s short-term price direction and long-term community trust. If the conflict signals fundamental misalignment between Aave Labs and the DAO, this could mark the start of continued tension rather than an isolated incident.

marsbit36 min fa

Second Largest Whale Cuts Losses and Liquidates, Can AAVE Still Be Bought Amid Deepening Divisions?

marsbit36 min fa

Second Largest Whale Cuts Losses and Liquidates, Can AAVE Still Be Bought Amid Deepening Conflict?

The second-largest AAVE whale, excluding the project team, protocol contracts, and exchanges, has sold off 230,000 AAVE tokens (worth approximately $38 million) at a loss, causing a 12% price drop. The sale occurred amid growing tensions between the Aave team and its community over governance and financial control. The conflict began when the community discovered that Aave Labs, without prior communication, redirected front-end exchange fees—previously directed to the Aave DAO treasury—to its own address after switching the default trading path to Cow Swap. This change could divert an estimated $10 million annually from the community to the team. Aave Labs defended the move, arguing that front-end products are separate from the protocol and that the team has the right to monetize its own infrastructure. In response, a proposal was made to transfer control of Aave’s brand assets—including domains and social accounts—to AAVE token holders. Founder Stani Kulechov opposed the proposal, calling it oversimplified and poorly structured, further escalating community backlash. The situation highlights deeper structural tensions in DeFi between team-controlled products and community-governed protocols. The outcome of the ongoing snapshot vote on the proposal may significantly influence AAVE’s price and long-term community trust.

Odaily星球日报39 min fa

Second Largest Whale Cuts Losses and Liquidates, Can AAVE Still Be Bought Amid Deepening Conflict?

Odaily星球日报39 min fa

When Prediction Markets No Longer 'Predict', But 'Leak the Truth': BlockBeats Officially Launches Prediction Market Coverage

For a long time, prediction markets were seen as rational arenas where people bet on future outcomes based on public information, with prices reflecting collective consensus. However, over the past year, it has become increasingly clear that many prediction markets are not actually "predicting the future." Instead, they are exposing outcomes that have already been determined and are known to a select few, even before official announcements. When an outcome is certain but not yet public, prediction markets become a powerful and unsettling mechanism for leaking information. The movement of money itself acts as a signal—no explicit爆料, anonymous tips, or statements are needed. Key signals include unusually large bets on specific options, addresses consistently placing winning bets during critical periods, and accounts that repeatedly "predict" correctly ahead of time. This phenomenon is changing how secrets are kept and revealed. Examples include plot twists in TV shows, results of award selections, upcoming product launches or regulatory decisions, and governance votes in crypto protocols. In traditional contexts, this would be considered insider information. But in prediction markets, the mere act of betting can reveal what is known to a few. The article also highlights how prediction markets can influence reality itself, not just reveal it. A notable example is from a Coinbase earnings call where CEO Brian Armstrong used specific words that were the subject of active prediction market bets. His utterance led to immediate market settlements, rewarding those who had bet on those words being spoken. This shows that prediction markets can create a "reality distortion field," where betting activity may actually shape outcomes. As platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi grow, the issues raised by prediction markets—information leakage, insider advantage, and potential manipulation—will have increasingly significant real-world impacts.

marsbit45 min fa

When Prediction Markets No Longer 'Predict', But 'Leak the Truth': BlockBeats Officially Launches Prediction Market Coverage

marsbit45 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di S S sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片