Manus Buyback Plan Emerges: Chinese Investors Plan to Repurchase Equity with $2 Billion, Path to Hong Kong IPO Becomes Clearer

marsbitPubblicato 2026-06-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-19

Introduzione

According to a report by The Information, early Chinese investors of Manus, including Tencent, Sequoia Capital China, and ZhenFund, are planning to repurchase the company from Meta for $2 billion—the same price Meta paid in its acquisition last December. This move is a direct response to the Chinese government's prohibition of the foreign acquisition in April. As part of the repurchase plan, Manus is considering establishing a Sino-foreign joint venture within China. This structure is seen as a way to ensure regulatory compliance for its Chinese investors and to pave the way for a future IPO in Hong Kong. Notably, U.S. investor Benchmark will not participate in the buyback, which will concentrate ownership even more among Chinese capital. Since its acquisition by Meta, Manus's business has grown rapidly, with its annualized revenue run rate reportedly increasing four-to-fivefold to $400-$500 million in roughly six months. This strong growth underpins the investors' willingness to repurchase at the original price. Financially, the forced unwinding of the deal may benefit the early investors, allowing them to regain equity at a cost far below the company's current implied valuation, with the added prospect of an independent future listing. However, specific terms of the repurchase, including funding proportions and the joint venture's equity structure, are still under negotiation. This "repurchase-joint venture-Hong Kong IPO" approach could serve as a reference model for oth...

By | 强调Next

According to a report by The Information on June 18, early Chinese investors of Manus plan to spend $2 billion, approximately 13.5 billion yuan, to buy back the company from Meta. The investors mentioned in the report include Tencent, Sequoia Capital China (formerly Sequoia Capital China Fund), and ZhenFund.

$2 billion was precisely the consideration Meta paid to acquire Manus in December last year. Liu Yuan, a partner at ZhenFund, publicly stated at the time that this was Meta's third-largest acquisition since its founding, only behind WhatsApp and Scale AI. Now history seems to be repeating itself, but with the roles of buyer and seller completely reversed.

1 · From Distributing Proceeds to Buyback

Insiders revealed that institutions such as Sequoia Capital China, ZhenFund, and Benchmark have already distributed the proceeds from the Meta acquisition to their respective limited partners. Tencent is also a party that has secured its gains.

After the acquisition was halted, Sequoia Capital China and ZhenFund did not ask LPs to return the already distributed profits. Instead, they intend to use newly raised funds to repurchase their respective Manus equity at Meta's original acquisition price. Tencent will also participate in this round of buyback.

It is worth noting that Benchmark will not participate in the buyback. An investor told The Information that this means Chinese investors will ultimately hold a larger proportion of Manus shares, and the company's equity structure will be more concentrated in Chinese capital than before the acquisition.

2 · Joint Venture Structure, Paving the Way for HK Listing

As part of the buyback plan, Manus is considering adjusting its corporate structure by establishing a Sino-foreign joint venture registered in mainland China. Foreign media analysis suggests this joint venture structure is designed to allow Chinese investors to continue holding the company's equity in compliance with regulations, while also preparing for a future Hong Kong IPO. The report states that Chinese investors plan to increase their capital in Manus in US dollars.

This buyback is widely interpreted as a direct response to the halt order issued in April this year. At that time, the Foreign Investment Security Review Office under the National Development and Reform Commission issued an announcement, prohibiting the "foreign acquisition of the Manus project" and requiring the parties involved to rescind the transaction and restore the original equity status.

Bloomberg previously reported two details. First, in May this year, Manus's three founders, Xiao Hong, Ji Yichao, and Zhang Tao, discussed raising about $1 billion from external investors to complete the buyback from Meta, with a valuation not less than the original $2 billion. The funding shortfall might be covered by the founding team with their own funds. Second, since June, Meta has severed the data connection between Manus and its internal systems, and notified employees to gradually migrate Manus-related projects to Meta's own systems, with no new Manus-related work to be initiated. The report by The Information is the most specific disclosure about the buyback plan to date.

3 · Business Data: Revenue Quadrupled or Quintupled in Half a Year

Insiders revealed that since being acquired by Meta, Manus's performance has been growing rapidly. Its current annualized revenue run rate has climbed to $400-500 million, approximately 2.7 to 3.4 billion yuan. At the time of the Meta acquisition, this figure was only $100 million, about 680 million yuan.

In other words, from its acquisition in December last year to now, Manus's revenue scale has increased four to fivefold in about half a year. This growth rate is also a key reason investors are willing to repurchase at the original price rather than trying to bargain for a lower price.

4 · Who Wins

From a financial perspective, the rescission of this acquisition might actually benefit Manus's early investors. Two insiders analyzed that the investors essentially get to reclaim the company's equity at a cost far below its current sale valuation. Furthermore, Manus has the opportunity to pursue an independent listing in the future, no longer needing to be part of the Meta ecosystem.

However, details are still being finalized. Both insiders emphasized that specific terms of the buyback transaction, including the funding ratio, equity design of the joint venture company, and the pace of capital increase, are still under negotiation.

Manus's financing journey has been quite legendary. In the Seed round in February 2023, ZhenFund invested about $3 million, resulting in a post-money valuation of $14 million; in the Angel round in August of the same year, the valuation rose to $50 million; in the Series A round in November 2024, Sequoia Capital China, Tencent, ZhenFund, and Wang Huiwen jointly invested, valuing the company at $85 million; in the Series B round in April 2025, led by Benchmark, the valuation approached $500 million. In just over two years, the valuation increased over a hundredfold, only to be acquired by Meta for $2 billion at the end of last year.

Now, this transaction is being rolled back. For Chinese AI startups, Manus's combination of "buyback + joint venture + Hong Kong IPO" might become a reference case for handling compliance issues in cross-border M&A going forward.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the reported plan of Manus' early Chinese investors regarding Meta's ownership, and what is the proposed amount?

AThe early Chinese investors, including Tencent, Sequoia Capital China (formerly Sequoia Capital China Fund), and ZhenFund, plan to repurchase Manus from Meta for $2 billion. This is the same amount Meta paid to acquire the company in December of last year.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary reason behind establishing a Sino-foreign joint venture as part of the repurchase plan?

AThe primary reason for considering a Sino-foreign joint venture structure is to allow the Chinese investment parties to compliantly hold equity in the company and, simultaneously, to pave the way for a future initial public offering (IPO) in Hong Kong.

QHow has Manus's business performance changed since its acquisition by Meta, according to the article?

ASince being acquired by Meta, Manus's business has grown rapidly. Its annualized revenue run rate has climbed to $400-$500 million, which is approximately four to five times the $100 million rate at the time of the Meta acquisition around six months prior.

QWhy does the article suggest the forced divestment might be financially beneficial for Manus's early investors?

AThe article suggests it might be a financial benefit because the investors can repurchase their equity at the original acquisition price of $2 billion, which is likely far lower than the company's current valuation given its rapid revenue growth. This allows them to regain ownership at a favorable cost, with the potential for an independent IPO in the future.

QWhich major early investor, mentioned in the article, has decided not to participate in the repurchase plan?

ABenchmark, a major early investor that led Manus's Series B funding round, has decided not to participate in the repurchase plan led by the Chinese investment consortium.

Letture associate

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit3 h fa

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit3 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手3 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手3 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit5 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit5 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手7 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手7 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit8 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit8 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures