Liquidity shock? LIT drops 16% after Justin Sun pulls funds from Lighter

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-07Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-07

Introduzione

LIT, the native token of Lighter DEX, dropped over 16% to a record low of $1.15 following reports that Justin Sun withdrew $40.76 million from its liquidity pool. In total, Sun removed $152 million, representing 18% of the platform's total USDC TVL. This triggered significant net outflows of $155.1 million on March 5th, the second-largest daily withdrawal in the platform’s history. Sun clarified that he was “rebalancing” his wallets and intends to redeposit the funds, reaffirming his long-term bullish stance on Lighter. Despite the sell-off, major LIT whales did not reduce their holdings, suggesting the downturn was driven by retail and leveraged traders.

LIT, the native token of Lighter DEX, shed over 16% of its value into the weekend.

The token slipped from $1.38 to a record low of $1.15. The decline followed reports that Justin Sun, the founder of TRON, had withdrawn $40 million from the DEX’s liquidity pool.

According to an on-chain analyst, MLM, Sun withdrew $40.76 million from Lighter LLP on Thursday during the U.S trading session.

The analyst noted that Sun collectively removed a total of $152 million from the trading platform. This represented 18% of Lighter’s total USDC TVL (total locked value). In response, traders expressed bearish views about the move. This was evidenced by LIT’s sharp sell-off.

Lighter’s daily outflows hit $155M

A deeper look into the Lighter DEX reinforced the analyst’s findings, with Artemis data flagging a whopping $155.1 million in net outflows on 05 March.

This was the second-highest daily outflow from Lighter after the 10 October crash, which saw $179 million in outflows.

With over 90% of withdrawals driven by Sun, the community is now worried about his move.

In response, Sun clarified that he was just “rebalancing” his wallets and would deposit the funds back into the LLP.

“We still hold all LIT purchased and remain bullish on Lighter long term. We are rebalancing wallets and will redeposit into LLP soon.”

It remains unclear whether Sun’s move was linked to the recent SEC dismissal of a fraud case against him and his firms.

However, it’s worth pointing out that such a massive withdrawal from a liquidy pool doesn’t necessarily mean a trading platform is unsafe. On the contrary, it does affect market depth and could increase slippages, making it risky and volatile to enter or exit large orders.

Whales hold on to their LIT

Surprisingly though, the recent plunge wasn’t driven by top whales.

Santiment showed that wallets holding 1 million LIT to 1 billion LIT showed no changes in their balance in March, let alone on Thursday – A sign that the recent sell-off was likely driven by retail holders and leverage traders.

It remains to be seen whether these resilient whales will help form a base for LIT to rebound and reverse recent losses.


Final Summary

  • LIT dropped by 16% over the weekend after Justin Sun withdrew over $150 million from the DEX’s liquidity pool.
  • Sun reassured the community that he would deposit the funds again soon.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the percentage drop in LIT's value and what triggered it?

ALIT's value dropped by over 16% after Justin Sun withdrew $40 million from the Lighter DEX liquidity pool.

QHow much did Justin Sun collectively withdraw from the Lighter trading platform and what percentage of the total USDC TVL did this represent?

AJustin Sun collectively withdrew a total of $152 million, which represented 18% of Lighter's total USDC TVL (Total Value Locked).

QWhat reason did Justin Sun give for his large withdrawal from the liquidity pool?

AJustin Sun clarified that he was 'rebalancing' his wallets and stated that he would deposit the funds back into the LLP soon, remaining bullish on Lighter long-term.

QAccording to Santiment data, who was primarily responsible for the recent sell-off of LIT tokens?

AThe recent sell-off was likely driven by retail holders and leverage traders, as wallets held by top whales (holding 1 million to 1 billion LIT) showed no changes in their balances.

QWhat was the net outflow from Lighter DEX on March 5th, and how does it compare to the record outflow?

AThere was a net outflow of $155.1 million from Lighter DEX on March 5th, which was the second-highest daily outflow after the record of $179 million set on October 10th.

Letture associate

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit9 min fa

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit9 min fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit19 min fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit19 min fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare SUN

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di SUN (SUN) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente SUNSUN.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva SUN (SUN)Dopo aver acquistato SUN (SUN), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia SUN (SUN)Scambia facilmente SUN (SUN) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

863 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.12Aggiornato il 2025.03.21

Come comprare SUN

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di SUN SUN sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片