Lighter buybacks hit 3% of supply – But LIT holds above $1 IF…

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-08

Introduzione

LIT faces persistent bearish pressure, trading near $1.10 with weekly losses of 23%. Despite a buyback program that repurchased 7.48M tokens (3% of supply) using protocol revenue, market sentiment remains negative. Sell volume dominates, and declining revenue and trading activity suggest continued downside risk. Key support at $1 is at risk of breaking, with further decline possible toward $0.96 unless momentum shifts above $1.30.

Lighter faced persistent bearish pressure after failing to hold above $1.50. Since then, the altcoin traded inside a descending channel and touched $1.07.

At press time, Lighter [LIT] traded near $1.10, down 2.4% daily and extending weekly losses to roughly 23%.

Amid this pressure, the Lighter team attempted to counter selling momentum through a sustained token buyback program.

Lighter buybacks reach 3% supply

Lighter launched a token buyback program in early January and steadily repurchased LIT tokens from the open market.

Since then, the protocol bought back 7.48 million LIT tokens, worth about $12.67 million. In the most recent purchase, the team acquired 812,000 LIT for $1.06 million.

According to the team’s statement, the repurchased tokens represent around 3% of the circulating supply.

Notably, the protocol funds these buybacks using revenue generated across its products.

However, the network’s Revenue declined sharply in recent months.

Daily Revenue previously reached peaks near $1.5 million, but recently fell closer to $100k–$120k levels.

Over the past day, Revenue stood near $122k, highlighting a sharp drop from earlier highs.

Even so, the team continued executing automated buybacks, signaling an ongoing commitment to stabilizing token demand.

Bearish sentiment still dominates the market

Despite the buyback efforts, market sentiment remained largely bearish. On Binance derivatives markets, sellers dominated activity through most of the past month.

On the 8th of March, LIT recorded roughly 1.7 million in Sell Volume versus 1.28 million in Buy Volume.

Over the same period, Net Buy Volume dropped to –3.5 million, reflecting persistent selling pressure.

Historically, sustained sell-side dominance often precedes further downside as bearish momentum builds.

Perpetual markets also signaled reduced participation. The Volume remained above $1 billion, but declined noticeably in recent days.

Perps Volume fell from roughly $3.1 billion to $1.1 billion within three days, marking a decline of about 64%.

This drop suggested traders reduced exposure while waiting for a clearer market direction.

Is $1 support at risk?

Lighter continued showing downside momentum amid broader risk-off conditions across crypto markets. That environment encouraged holders to sell small rebounds, pushing LIT toward repeated lower lows.

Momentum indicators also reflected weakening bullish strength.

The Stochastic RSI formed a bearish crossover inside oversold territory and remained near the lower band. That structure indicated sustained seller control.

If selling pressure persists, LIT could break the $1 support and slide toward $0.96.

However, a recovery above $1.30 may shift momentum, where the Parabolic SAR currently sits.


Final Summary

  • Lighter extended losses after failing to hold $1.50, trading near $1.10 within a persistent descending channel.
  • The protocol bought back 7.48 million LIT tokens (~$12.67M) since January, equal to about 3% of the circulating supply.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the price of LIT at the time of the article and how much had it fallen weekly?

AAt press time, LIT traded near $1.10, down 2.4% daily and extending weekly losses to roughly 23%.

QHow many LIT tokens has the protocol bought back since the program began and what percentage of the supply does this represent?

AThe protocol has bought back 7.48 million LIT tokens, worth about $12.67 million, which represents around 3% of the circulating supply.

QWhat was the recent daily revenue for the Lighter protocol and how does it compare to previous highs?

AOver the past day, the revenue stood near $122k, which is a sharp drop from previous peaks near $1.5 million.

QWhat did the market data on Binance on March 8th indicate about trading sentiment for LIT?

AOn March 8th, LIT recorded roughly 1.7 million in Sell Volume versus 1.28 million in Buy Volume, with a Net Buy Volume of -3.5 million, reflecting persistent selling pressure and bearish sentiment.

QAccording to the technical analysis, what are the potential price targets if the $1 support level breaks?

AIf the $1 support level breaks, LIT could slide toward $0.96. A recovery above $1.30 may shift momentum.

Letture associate

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

SharpLink CEO reflects on the milestone of Ethereum surpassing 1 million historical developers, emphasizing that this figure represents the largest pool of technical talent ever assembled around an open, permissionless blockchain network. While approximately 232,000 developers remain active, the key question for the crypto industry is not which chain is fastest, but where the best builders choose to build long-term. Ethereum's advantage lies in a decade-long accumulation of infrastructure, standards, tools, liquidity, and a cohesive culture, making it the default operating system for programmable finance. This developer base is tackling complex challenges: the Glamsterdam upgrade aims to enhance scalability while preserving core principles; synchronous composability seeks to unify Rollup ecosystems; and significant efforts are underway for post-quantum security. Ethereum's deeper network effects stem from composability and shared standards (like the EVM and Solidity), creating a flywheel of more developers, tools, and liquidity. Three reinforcing strengths cement Ethereum's lead: credible neutrality (secured by ~900k validators), a modular architecture with interconnected Rollups, and a culture that attracts top researchers. The ecosystem is consolidating as the trusted coordination layer for internet-native finance, favored by large institutions valuing security and liquidity. The future of Ethereum is being built by this global community of founders and architects.

链捕手5 min fa

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

链捕手5 min fa

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

"Chinese Soil Chokes Japanese Giants" The production of a key electronic specialty gas, tungsten hexafluoride (WF6), vital for manufacturing AI chips, was halted by two leading Japanese producers—Kanto Denka and Central Glass. Their shutdown was not due to a technological failure but a sudden, critical shortage of a raw material they had long taken for granted: ultra-high-purity (6N-grade) tungsten powder, which is almost entirely sourced from China. Following a quiet Chinese export announcement in January 2026, tungsten powder shipments to Japan dropped to zero for months. Despite frantic efforts, Japanese companies found no viable alternative; imported powder was three times more expensive and lacked the required purity. Their existing stockpiles were exhausted by mid-2026. WF6 is essential for depositing tungsten into the microscopic contact holes of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) chips, which are crucial for advanced processors like those from Nvidia. While Japanese firms had mastered producing ultra-pure WF6 gas, their entire supply chain relied on China's 6N tungsten powder—a dependency now revealed as a fatal vulnerability. China's dominance in this "soil" results from decades of painstaking R&D by companies like Xiamen Tungsten and China Tungsten & Hightech. They overcame immense technical hurdles, such as separating chemically similar molybdenum from tungsten, to achieve mass production of the world's purest tungsten powder. With their primary suppliers gone, Kanto Denka and Central Glass announced a permanent halt to WF6 production starting July 1, 2026. This immediately created a supply crisis for major semiconductor manufacturers like Samsung and SK Hynix, forcing them to urgently seek and certify new Chinese suppliers for WF6 itself. The reversal marks a dramatic shift: China has moved from exporting low-value raw materials to controlling the high-purity foundation of a critical global tech supply chain, upending a long-established industrial hierarchy.

marsbit36 min fa

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

marsbit36 min fa

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

The article centers on the crucial question posed in the title: what is Seyond Technology really worth if its dominant customer, Tencent, were to stop purchasing its AI chips? As the last of China's "Four AI Chip Dragons" to secure approval for a public listing, Seyond's IPO filing reveals a profound and controversial dependency. In 2025, 74.9% to over 80% of its revenue came from Tencent. The piece argues that this extreme customer concentration is not merely a vulnerability but a strategic outcome of China's AI industry evolution. It contrasts Seyond's path with its peers (Moore Thread, Biren Technology, and MetaX), noting that while others raced to market with ambitious stories, Seyond focused first on securing and delivering for a major client. Its explosive revenue growth—with Q1 2026 up 1474.85% year-on-year—is driven by concentrated orders from Tencent, which itself faces massive, escalating AI compute demands for products like its Yuanbao and Hunyuan models. The relationship is framed as a deliberate, symbiotic cultivation of a supply chain. As both a major shareholder (20.26%) and primary client, Tencent is actively fostering Seyond to build a controllable, stable alternative to NVIDIA, similar to how global tech giants historically nurtured key suppliers. The high switching costs—involving software stacks and deployed systems—create a deep "ecological moat" for Seyond within Tencent's ecosystem. The analysis positions the AI chip landscape in three tiers: NVIDIA as the global leader, Huawei's Ascend as the state-backed player, and commercial firms like Seyond competing for market orders. Seyond is increasingly seen as "Tencent's compute foundation," with its product roadmap closely aligned with the tech giant's needs. The conclusion is that the industry's metric for success is shifting from fundraising and technical specs to real orders, delivery capability, and ecosystem binding. Seyond's value, therefore, lies not just in its chips but in holding a massive, multi-year procurement order from China's largest internet company—a tangible asset arguably more telling than any technical whitepaper in the current climate. The core insight is that for domestic chips, the ultimate challenge isn't just catching up technologically with NVIDIA, but earning the trust, scenarios, and recurring orders from a major anchor client.

marsbit1 h fa

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片