Judgment from a Crypto VC: The Final Stop is Here, All Passengers Please Disembark

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-28

Introduzione

A crypto VC firm declares the end of the line: the era driven by retail speculation and crypto-native ideology is over. The future belongs to the large-scale, institutional adoption of blockchain technology, stripped of its decentralized ethos. While retail became distracted by memecoins, major institutions—banks, payment giants—entered en masse, recognizing blockchain's unparalleled efficiency for value transfer. Their goal isn't to embrace decentralization but to build proprietary, controlled networks, adopting the technology while discarding its foundational philosophy. This marks the transition from a "crypto industry" to a "digital asset economy"—a foundational layer powering mainstream finance, not a separate rebellion. Trillions in assets are poised for tokenization, but largely through traditional, regulated channels. For builders and investors, the old playbook of launching low-float, high-FDV tokens for retail speculation is dead. The new imperative is to build robust infrastructure that serves institutional needs: compliance, security, and seamless integration into existing financial systems. The real opportunity lies not in fighting this shift but in enabling it, as institutions become the primary conduit for onboarding the next billion users and tokenizing the next hundred trillion dollars in assets. The game has fundamentally changed.

Author: Avishay Ovadia (Founding Partner, Collider)

Compiled by: TechFlow

TechFlow Introduction: Collider is an Israeli crypto VC. Although not a large fund, its views can reflect some judgments from upstream industry practitioners.

Its Founding Partner Avishay Ovadia wrote an article on the direction of the crypto industry: The era of retail investors is over. Institutions are not here to 'embrace decentralization'; they are here to take apart the components.

They want blockchain's efficiency, not crypto's ideology. For entrepreneurs and investors, the old playbook is obsolete. The rules of the digital asset economy have completely changed.

Main Text:

For a decade, we told ourselves a fairy tale.

We believed mass adoption of crypto would be a bottom-up revolution. Ordinary people, retail investors, would grow tired of banks, swallow the orange pill, and migrate to a permissionless utopia.

Last year, that fantasy was permanently disproven.

The visitors flooding in were not the users we expected; they were gamblers. They weren't looking for a new financial system; they were looking for a casino with higher leverage. They traded memecoins, took profit from each other, and disappeared into the shadows when the music stopped.

But while retail was busy losing money on memecoins, something more important happened. Those 'giants'—institutions, banks, payment behemoths—did not leave. They went all in.

They weren't here because they believed in decentralization. They discovered blockchain is the most efficient pipeline for moving value ever created. They weren't chasing a technological ideal; they were chasing profits. Larry Fink recently said tokenization is one of two major trends reshaping financial services. We are no longer talking about a niche market, but a $140 trillion transformation.

The Great Transfer of Power

We handed over the keys to the kingdom ourselves. We built the infrastructure, validated the concepts, and then the incumbents came to harvest the territory.

We suffered from immense hubris. We thought we could change them. We thought Bitcoin's miracle could be replicated for any altcoin. We thought they would eventually buy our useless governance tokens, our ghost-town L1s and L2s, and play by our rules. We were wrong. For institutions, relinquishing control isn't 'progress'; it's suicide. Their business models are built on control.

So they didn't come to play in our mud. The vast majority of institutions won't join our DAOs, nor care about our 'community vibes'. They are building their own walled gardens, joining ecosystems like Canton, Zero, Tempo, Kinexys, building orchestration layers that connect traditional platforms to new chains. They are using blockchain, tokenization, instant settlement, self-custody, but stripping away the 'crypto' skin.

They are keeping user privacy, data silos, and profits. They are taking our open-source code, forking our protocols, but not buying our tokens. Swallowing the technology, spitting out the ideology.

The Game's Evolutionary Path

The game has evolved along a predictable, chaotic trajectory to this final station today.

From 2009 to 2014 was the Bitcoin Anarchists phase, a small group of cypherpunks tinkering on the fringe. Then came the Crypto Industry phase, with Ethereum and smart contracts taking center stage. By the 2018 bear market, the narrative shifted to Blockchain Technology, with enterprises trying to unbundle the ledger from the asset, but failing. Then came the rise and spectacular collapse of Web3, with NFTs, GameFi, and the creator economy shining briefly until FTX imploded and turned off all the lights. In 2024, propelled by an election year and the Trump candidacy, the Crypto Industry made a glorious return, only to slide into a season of greed, disgust, and toxicity.

Now, in this new bear market, we have finally arrived at the destination we've been racing towards: the Digital Asset Economy.

This is the final stop. Crypto is no longer an 'industry'; it has become an infrastructure layer. It is the invisible engine powering the world of fintech. It's not crypto eating Wall Street; it's Wall Street eating us.

This is Actually Good News

If you're a purist, this feels like betrayal. If you're a strategist, this is where the real money is.

We have finally reached the node where trillions of dollars are waiting to be deployed. We have entered the 'Distributor Era'. Big money doesn't move without regulation, KYC, and bank-sanctioned rails. DTCC announcing it will tokenize assets held by DTC and support liquid assets like the Russell 1000 index—this isn't a pilot; it's the sound of the floodgates opening.

We are about to tokenize every asset on Earth, from real estate to private credit to government bonds. But most of it won't happen through decentralized swaps on public chains. It will happen through payment giants and banks.

Operating the Machine

Two paths. You can sit in a corner and cry 'the crypto spirit is dead,' or you can recognize we just won the biggest war in financial history. We convinced the world this technology works. Now, we have to build for the people who actually have the capital to use it.

The future of this industry isn't in vaporware tokens. It's embedded in the hard infrastructure serving the new players. It's running today: look at the institutional-grade solutions already broadcasting trillions of dollars in transactions on-chain, trading billions between institutions, tokenizing billions in assets. This is the new application layer.

The New Playbook

Stop being a 'crypto bro.' Start thinking like a fintech veteran.

Think: If every asset on Earth is tokenized, what competitive advantage does buying your particular 'crypto' token have? If you can trade any global asset 24/7, with instant settlement, through a trusted traditional broker, why would you send money to an offshore exchange or sweat over a non-custodial wallet? Why worry about hacks and total loss, instead of trading easily and safely through your existing financial dashboard?

Entrepreneurs, don't build in a vacuum. Before writing the first line of code, visit every distribution link in the chain. Understand their needs, dive deep into their fears: fear of regulatory crackdowns, fear of losing control, fear of unmanageable security incidents. Your job is to create something they can't build themselves but fits perfectly into their existing world.

Investors, the old playbook is dead. The days of early investing in low-float, high-FDV vaporware and praying for retail to provide a 100x exit are over. Digital asset investing is becoming brutally hard. We are moving towards real sales cycles, real utility, and revenue-generating businesses. You need to invest in projects with real moats in a world of open-source technology. 99.99% of tokens don't have that. Finding projects with strong moats, top-tier teams, real usage, token value accrual, institutional adoption, reasonable valuations, healthy vesting schedules, active communities, high liquidity, risk management capabilities, and market opportunity is hard. But it can be done.

Stop fighting the institutions. They *are* the new distribution channels. They will bring the next billion users and the next $100 trillion into the digital asset economy. Even if those users have no idea they're using a blockchain.

The game has changed. The players are bigger. The stakes are higher. Welcome to the final stop. What you do next is up to you.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the author from Collider VC, what marks the end of the 'crypto fairytale' and the start of a new era?

AThe influx of speculators chasing memecoins and the full-scale entry of large institutions like banks and payment giants, who are adopting blockchain for its efficiency while stripping away its ideological 'crypto' layer, mark the end of the old narrative. This signals the arrival of the 'digital asset economy' era.

QWhat is the author's view on how traditional institutions are adopting blockchain technology?

AThe author believes traditional institutions are not embracing the decentralized, permissionless ideology of crypto. Instead, they are 'harvesting the territory' by taking the open-source technology, forking protocols, and building their own walled-garden ecosystems (like Canton, Zero) to gain efficiency, control, privacy, and profit without buying into the native crypto tokens or communities.

QWhat does the author identify as the 'final destination' for the evolution of the crypto space?

AThe 'final destination' is the 'Digital Asset Economy,' where crypto/blockchain ceases to be a standalone industry and becomes an invisible foundational engine powering the broader financial technology world. It's characterized by the large-scale tokenization of all assets through traditional financial gatekeepers.

QWhat new advice does the author give to entrepreneurs in this new 'digital asset economy'?

AThe author advises entrepreneurs to stop building in a vacuum. They must thoroughly understand the needs and fears (like regulatory risk, loss of control) of traditional distribution channels (banks, payment giants) before writing code. They should build solutions that seamlessly integrate into the existing financial world, serving as the hard infrastructure for these new, powerful players.

QHow has the investment thesis changed for venture capitalists according to the article?

AThe old model of investing in low-float, high-FDV tokens hoping for retail-driven 100x pumps is dead. Investment now requires finding projects with real moats in an open-source world, genuine utility, revenue, institutional adoption, reasonable valuations, healthy tokenomics, and active communities. It's about backing real businesses in the digital asset economy, not speculative assets.

Letture associate

Justin Sun’s Interview with Hurun Report: A New Order and Certainty for Value Flow in the Era of Transformation

In an interview with *Hurun Report*, Justin Sun, founder of TRON, discussed the evolution of the Web3 industry as it moves from initial exploration to large-scale adoption. He emphasized that the core value of blockchain lies in building an open and inclusive internet of value, enabling anyone globally to transfer and use funds efficiently and at low cost, regardless of location or access to banking. Sun highlighted that projects with lasting impact are those built on genuine demand and real-world usage. He pointed to the stablecoin payment ecosystem as the most mature and scalable application currently, noting that TRON has rapidly become one of the world's largest stablecoin networks. The circulation of USDT on TRON has surpassed $86.3 billion, driven by actual use cases such as cross-border transfers and daily payments, demonstrating strong network effects. Regarding strategy, Sun outlined a methodology combining data-driven iteration, rapid execution, and user-centric focus. He cited the decision to partner with Tether to launch TRC-20 USDT as a key strategic move, based on an assessment of market trends and long-term potential, which has become a significant growth engine for the TRON ecosystem. On globalization, Sun stressed the importance of local compliance and cultural adaptation, noting that success in different markets depends on deep understanding and local partnerships. He also addressed the convergence of AI and blockchain, describing it as a transformative direction where blockchain provides decentralized infrastructure for AI, while AI enhances the intelligence and user experience of blockchain systems. For industry participants and young entrepreneurs, Sun advised continuous learning and adaptability in a fast-changing environment, focusing on building irreplaceable core strengths rather than spreading resources too thinly. Through infrastructure development, global strategy, and technological foresight, TRON aims to advance the practical implementation and evolution of the value internet.

marsbit17 min fa

Justin Sun’s Interview with Hurun Report: A New Order and Certainty for Value Flow in the Era of Transformation

marsbit17 min fa

Samsung Leverages Technology Cycles, SK Hynix Relies on HBM, What Enabled Micron to Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the Idaho-based memory chip maker, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion, securing its position as one of the top three DRAM manufacturers alongside Samsung and SK Hynix. Its survival and growth story is marked by a unique combination of political maneuvering and hard-won manufacturing efficiency, but also strategic missteps that now challenge its future. Founded in 1978 in Boise without significant government or capital backing, Micron repeatedly turned to Washington for survival during critical junctures. In the 1980s, it filed anti-dumping complaints against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which Micron had earlier licensed its 64K DRAM technology to. In 2002, Micron avoided heavy fines in a price-fixing investigation by acting as a whistleblower against its competitors, cementing its reputation as a "political opportunist." A major strategic error occurred in 2013 with its $2.5 billion acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. This deal burdened Micron with integrating incompatible manufacturing processes just as the industry was pivoting toward HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), a critical technology for AI. SK Hynix had launched its first HBM chip that same year. By the time AI demand exploded with ChatGPT in 2022, SK Hynix commanded about 85% of the HBM3 market, while Micron, playing catch-up, held only around 3%. In 2017, Micron employed similar tactics against a new competitor, Chinese startup Fujian Jinhua, by alleging intellectual property theft, which led to U.S. sanctions effectively crippling the firm. However, this strategy backfired in 2023 when China banned Micron's products from its critical infrastructure, causing its revenue share from China to plummet from 14% in FY2023 to just 7.1% by FY2025. Today, Micron faces a triple squeeze: it lags in the high-margin HBM race, faces pricing pressure in low-end DRAM from Chinese manufacturers like CXMT, and has lost crucial access to the booming Chinese AI server market. Despite its political strategies, Micron's core strength is its exceptional manufacturing cost control, achieved through decades of engineering. Its DRAM chips have a smaller cell area than its rivals, yielding more chips per wafer. This efficiency has been vital for weathering industry downturns. However, this advantage cannot compensate for the decade lost in HBM development. Micron is now racing to ramp up production of its HBM3E, certified by NVIDIA, and develop HBM4. Its future hinges on whether it can close this technological "time debt" through relentless R&D and execution, in a marathon where its competitors, having started earlier, are not slowing down.

marsbit35 min fa

Samsung Leverages Technology Cycles, SK Hynix Relies on HBM, What Enabled Micron to Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

marsbit35 min fa

Deconstructing Mysterious Researcher Serenity's Chokepoint Algorithm and the Global Revaluation of Equity Assets

Unmasking Serenity's "Chokepoint Theory": A Framework for AI-Era Investment This article deconstructs the investment methodology of the pseudonymous online researcher Serenity (formerly AleaBito on Reddit), who claims extraordinary returns by identifying critical bottlenecks in AI and robotics supply chains. Rejecting Wall Street's typical top-down analysis, Serenity employs a bottom-up, reverse-engineering approach. Starting with an end product like an Nvidia GPU cluster, he meticulously maps the global supply chain down to its most essential, irreplaceable physical components—the "choke points." These are low-profile, often monopolized sub-sectors where a disruption could paralyze entire downstream industries, analogous to a strategic strait controlling global oil flow. His primary focus is the physical evolution of AI data centers, specifically the shift from copper interconnects to silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO). He identifies five critical, monopolized technical barriers within CPO: high-precision fiber alignment components (e.g., FOCI), external light sources and high-power lasers (e.g., SIVE), molecular beam epitaxy equipment (ALRIB/Riber), ultra-high-purity red phosphorus raw materials, and Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) wafers (Soitec). Serenity extends this framework to humanoid robotics, arguing that while the AI "brain" resides in the US, the physical "body" hardware (actuators, gears, motors) is dominated by Asian manufacturers. He highlights a looming "demand tsunami" for specific rare earth elements essential for robot motors, presenting a severe future supply chain and geopolitical challenge. The article cites several of his investment targets (RPI, SIVE, Soitec, VLN, NBIS) where identifying such choke points, coupled with correcting market mispricings (e.g., ticker code confusion for VLN), allegedly led to significant re-ratings. Ultimately, the article posits that Serenity's core value is not in providing stock picks, but in demonstrating a paradigm: using deep technical analysis to find the silent, indispensable "physical switches" within complex systems, thereby exploiting institutional research blind spots. However, it warns of major risks, including illiquidity in micro-cap stocks, potential "pump-and-dump" accusations, and the foundational gamble that his identified technological paths (like CPO) are the correct and inevitable ones.

marsbit37 min fa

Deconstructing Mysterious Researcher Serenity's Chokepoint Algorithm and the Global Revaluation of Equity Assets

marsbit37 min fa

Cross-strait Regulators Jointly Block Hong Kong Stock Account Openings: Where Can Your Money Go Now?

**Summary:** On May 22, 2026, financial regulators in mainland China and Hong Kong launched a synchronized crackdown targeting informal channels used by mainland investors to trade in Hong Kong and US stocks via Hong Kong-based securities firms. The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) issued a stringent circular to licensed brokers, mandating stricter onboarding procedures for mainland clients. New requirements include a mandatory written declaration stating that all investment funds originate from *outside* mainland China and are from legal sources. The SFC also demanded the closure of accounts opened with suspicious documents and dormant accounts. Simultaneously, China's securities regulator, along with seven other ministries, initiated a two-year rectification plan, penalizing firms like Futu and Tiger Brokers for illegal cross-border operations. This effectively ends the previously common grey-area practice for mainlanders. Immediate impacts are evident. Social media reports show mainland investors traveling to Hong Kong for in-person account openings are now frequently denied after signing the new declaration, even at firms like uSMART that still accept applications. The declaration acts as both a compliance shield for brokers and a filter for clients. While major internet brokers have halted new mainland accounts, limited options remain. A few Hong Kong-licensed firms like uSMART, Fosun Wealth, and Cheerful still offer avenues, but approval is not guaranteed and hinges on proving offshore fund sources. Crucially, funding accounts must now be in the investor's own name at qualified Hong Kong or international banks, blocking previous informal methods like third-party transfers. For compliant access, official channels like Stock Connect, QDII, and the Cross-boundary Wealth Management Connect remain open. Individuals with verifiable overseas residency or status have better prospects. The crackdown signals the definitive end of the loosely regulated expansion period, forcing mainland investors toward stricter, fully compliant pathways for overseas asset allocation.

marsbit42 min fa

Cross-strait Regulators Jointly Block Hong Kong Stock Account Openings: Where Can Your Money Go Now?

marsbit42 min fa

Iran and the Fed -- Three Scenarios That Will Impact Global Markets Next

"Three Scenarios for Iran and the Fed Shaping Global Markets" Iranian geopolitics and the Fed's monetary policy path are two dominant themes for markets. Deutsche Bank Research outlines three scenarios linking Iran ceasefire outcomes to Fed policy, with oil prices as the key transmission channel. **Scenario 1: Peace Deal.** A breakthrough leading to the Strait of Hormuz reopening would ease near-term Fed tightening pressure. Recent inflation would be viewed as a temporary energy shock. However, medium-term risks remain; rate hikes could resurface in 2027 if inflation persists. **Scenario 2: Stalemate.** A breakdown in talks and a prolonged Strait closure, but no major escalation, is deemed the scenario with the *highest* Fed hike risk. Sustained high oil prices would feed into core inflation and threaten inflation expectations, while not severely damaging demand enough to give the Fed a reason to pause. This environment could necessitate multiple Fed rate hikes in 2026. **Scenario 3: Conflict Escalation.** Renewed conflict and sharply higher oil prices create a two-way risk for Fed policy. On one hand, it would risk severe inflation expectations de-anchoring, forcing a hawkish response. On the other, extreme oil prices could severely damage demand and the labor market, potentially shifting the Fed's focus toward easing. The ultimate policy decision would depend on which risk materializes first. Overall, Deutsche Bank's framework emphasizes that the path for oil prices, dictated by Iran, will define the nature of inflation pressures and ultimately determine the Fed's policy space. Key signals to watch include ceasefire progress, whether Brent crude stabilizes below $100, and any shift in Fed officials' rhetoric from discussing cuts to potential hikes.

marsbit51 min fa

Iran and the Fed -- Three Scenarios That Will Impact Global Markets Next

marsbit51 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片