JPMorgan to Expand JPM Coin Across Blockchains Starting With Canton

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-01-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-09

Introduzione

JPMorgan is expanding its JPM Coin deposit token to multiple blockchain networks, starting with the Canton Network, as part of a broader strategy to build an interoperable digital money system. JPM Coin represents U.S. dollar deposits held at the bank and is currently operational on Coinbase’s Ethereum Layer 2 network, Base. The expansion aims to enable near-instant value transfers across financial markets in a secure, regulated environment. Access is restricted to whitelisted institutional wallets to ensure compliance. Unlike JPMorgan’s private Kinaxis network—which supports multi-currency cross-border payments for clients like Siemens—JPM Coin operates entirely on public blockchain infrastructure, with all transactions recorded on-chain.

JPMorgan is planning to widen its blockchain payment infrastructure by taking its JPM Coin deposit token to various blockchain networks. The expansion is set to be initiated with the Canton Network.

After this, other platforms will be the target, as the firm targets making an interoperable digital money system. JPM Coin depicts U.S. dollar deposits held at the bank. Institutional clients can use the token to make payments on distributed ledgers.

The token currently uses Base, an Ethereum Layer 2 network made by Coinbase, for its operation. A spokesperson from JPMorgan revealed that the expansion will make regulated interoperable digital money.

The system will also permit near-instant value transfers over financial markets. Institutions leveraging Canton will be capable of receiving, transferring and redeeming JPMD swiftly within a safe environment.

The bank only permits whitelisted wallet addresses handled by institutional clients to use JPM Coin to ensure compliance and control. The limitations obstruct access while preserving security standards.

Delving Deep into JPM Coin

JPM Coin is not like other blockchain products of JPMorgan. The token isn’t built on the bank’s Kinexys network. The spokesperson reveals that JPM Coin has never been offered on private or permissioned infrastructure.

The Kinexys Digital Payments network was introduced in 2019, offering blockchain deposit accounts for institutional clients. These accounts permit 24/7 cross-border foreign exchange payments in USD, EUR and GBP.

Siemens leverages this system for international money transfers. The firm preserves Blockchain Deposit Accounts in Frankfurt and New York. These accounts permit Siemens to offer near-instant USD-to-EUR foreign exchange payments.

The system aids Siemens in beating restricted settlement windows. This enhances productivity for the company’s global business operations. The technology backs multi-currency, cross-border payments and liquidity management with the treasury platform of Siemens.

JPM Coin works completely on public blockchain infrastructure; when a client trades the token, the transaction is listed directly on-chain. This is not similar to traditional banking systems that leverage private databases.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Ethereum Struggles Below $3,300 as US Demand and ETF Flows Weaken

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is JPMorgan planning to expand with the Canton Network?

AJPMorgan is planning to expand its JPM Coin deposit token to various blockchain networks, starting with the Canton Network.

QHow does JPM Coin currently operate and on which network?

AJPM Coin currently operates on Base, an Ethereum Layer 2 network made by Coinbase.

QWhat is the primary purpose of JPM Coin for institutional clients?

AInstitutional clients can use JPM Coin to make payments on distributed ledgers, as it depicts U.S. dollar deposits held at JPMorgan.

QHow does the JPM Coin system ensure compliance and security?

AThe bank only permits whitelisted wallet addresses handled by institutional clients to use JPM Coin to ensure compliance and control.

QWhat key difference exists between JPM Coin and JPMorgan's Onyx network?

AJPM Coin is not built on JPMorgan's Onyx network and has never been offered on private or permissioned infrastructure, operating completely on public blockchain infrastructure.

Letture associate

Six Years Later, UNI Finally Welcomes Its Own "Buyback Bull"

After years of debate, Uniswap's UNI token has finally entered a 'buyback bull' phase following the long-awaited activation of its fee-switch mechanism. The UNIfication proposal, executed in December 2025, redirected a portion of protocol fees from select pools and Unichain sequencer revenue into a treasury (TokenJar) dedicated to buying back and permanently burning UNI. Initial market reaction was muted due to modest early burn rates. A significant shift occurred in July 2026 with the launch of Robinhood Chain. Uniswap's immediate deployment there skyrocketed trading volume, making it a top fee-generator. Subsequently, governance votes extended the fee mechanism to v4 pools and Robinhood Chain, causing protocol revenue to nearly triple. Daily funds directed to UNI burns rose sharply, with Robinhood Chain contributing over half. This transitioned UNI's narrative from a governance token to a cash-flow asset backed by a perpetual automatic buyer. UNI's price, which had languished around $2.30 in early June, nearly doubled to approach $4.60 by late July. Analysts credit this to the tangible cash flow from fees rather than mere speculation. Unlike many newer projects where buybacks are offset by large investor unlocks, UNI's six-year history has resulted in a widely distributed and relatively clean supply, allowing the buyback pressure to effectively impact the secondary market. The key test will be whether trading activity, particularly on Robinhood Chain, sustains after its initial gas subsidies expire.

marsbit1 min fa

Six Years Later, UNI Finally Welcomes Its Own "Buyback Bull"

marsbit1 min fa

Only 153 Venture Capital Firms Invested in July: Is the Crypto VC Industry Experiencing a 'Mass Extinction'?

In July 2026, only 153 unique venture capital firms participated in disclosed crypto funding rounds, marking the lowest monthly count since November 2020. This figure represents an 87% decline from the peak of 1,177 firms in 2022. Overall, the first seven months of 2026 saw crypto projects raise approximately $11.78 billion across 481 rounds. This crypto VC contraction contrasts sharply with the broader venture capital landscape, where global VC investment reached a record $560.4 billion in H1 2026, heavily fueled by major AI company financings. This shift in capital allocation has drawn funds away from the crypto sector. Within crypto, funding is highly concentrated. Trading platforms, prediction markets, and payment sectors absorbed 53% of the total capital. While early-stage deals remain frequent, the largest sums flow to a few late-stage rounds and mergers & acquisitions, which surged to $7.23 billion in Q2 2026. The market is consolidating around top funds like a16z crypto and Dragonfly, which successfully raised new multi-billion dollar funds, while many smaller firms have retreated. Analysts describe this as a "great extinction" for crypto VCs, where capital is becoming more selective, favoring proven business models and assets over early-stage speculation. This raises the bar for project quality, funding efficiency, and viable exit paths.

marsbit22 min fa

Only 153 Venture Capital Firms Invested in July: Is the Crypto VC Industry Experiencing a 'Mass Extinction'?

marsbit22 min fa

Storage Chip Stocks Skyrocket: Is This a Return to a Bull Market or a Dead Cat Bounce?

The storage chip sector experienced a dramatic overnight rebound in US markets, with major stocks like SK Hynix and Micron surging over 17%. This sharp reversal is attributed to multiple factors: potential short-selling bans and market stabilization measures from South Korea, significant leverage unwinding (with leveraged ETF assets down ~70% from peaks), cooler-than-expected US inflation data easing rate hike fears, and a stellar Microsoft earnings report showing strong cloud/AI demand growth. Microsoft's results, highlighting Azure revenue crossing $100 billion, helped counter the "AI bubble burst" narrative that had pressured the sector. However, the article cautions against declaring a sustained bull market. Key risks remain, including potential further interest rate hikes by the Bank of Japan, which could pressure global carry trades, and unanswered questions about whether high industry profits can be maintained amid the supply cycle and new competition. Investors are advised to monitor whether gains hold, watch for updates on HBM/DRAM/NAND pricing and orders, and await key upcoming events like NVIDIA's earnings. The conclusion emphasizes disciplined investing—avoiding panic selling or FOMO buying—and using strategies like hedging to manage risk in this volatile environment.

marsbit31 min fa

Storage Chip Stocks Skyrocket: Is This a Return to a Bull Market or a Dead Cat Bounce?

marsbit31 min fa

Strategy's Loss in the Second Quarter Reaches $8.22 Billion Amid Bitcoin Decline

Strategy, the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, reported a net loss of $8.22 billion for the second quarter. This loss was primarily driven by an $8.32 billion unrealized loss on its Bitcoin holdings due to a decline in the asset's price during the period. Despite these paper losses, the company increased its Bitcoin holdings to 843,775 BTC, a 25% growth since the start of the year. As part of a new monetization strategy, Strategy sold approximately $218.4 million worth of Bitcoin, mainly to fund dividends for preferred shareholders, with $216 million of that sold after Q2 ended. The company also built a $3.75 billion cash reserve, which it claims is sufficient to cover over two years of dividend and interest payments, aiming to insulate itself from Bitcoin's volatility while meeting obligations. Following the earnings release, Strategy's stock (MSTR) rose 4.7% in regular trading but corrected slightly after-hours. This pattern reflects how the company's accounting results are heavily tied to Bitcoin's price swings, even as its long-term strategy remains unchanged. The report indicates that Strategy is maintaining its core strategy of accumulating Bitcoin while building a financial buffer. This quarterly loss follows a recognizable pattern, with the company posting significant unrealized losses in previous quarters (e.g., $12.4 billion in Q4 2025 and ~$12.5 billion in Q1 2026) due to fair-value accounting. A key technical shift is its new monetization program, which introduces periodic selling pressure on the market, transitioning Strategy from a pure accumulator to a participant that occasionally adds supply. A critical question remains: how long can the cash reserve cover dividend obligations if a Bitcoin price downturn persists beyond two years?

cryptonews.ru42 min fa

Strategy's Loss in the Second Quarter Reaches $8.22 Billion Amid Bitcoin Decline

cryptonews.ru42 min fa

Will Terrorist Durov Ban Russian Officials?

Telegram founder Pavel Durov publicly reacted to being labeled a "terrorist" by Russian authorities, stating the designation came after he refused demands for mass surveillance and censorship on the platform. In a Telegram post, he highlighted that this status formally bans him from "publishing information online." Durov concluded with a statement widely circulated: Russian officials "clearly don't understand who can ban whom on the internet." This remark suggests Durov could potentially restrict official Russian government and officials' channels on Telegram, which continue to operate on the platform despite its formal blocking in Russia. The situation parallels previous, slow-moving state directives, like switching officials to domestic cars, contrasted with the current push to migrate all government communication to the Russian-made messenger MAX by 2030. However, reports indicate many officials still use Telegram via workarounds, fearing surveillance on MAX, while alternatives like BiP and KakaoTalk recently became inaccessible in Russia without a VPN. Durov has not specified any immediate actions against state channels. His statement is an initial response, with further developments depending on the authorities' reaction. The dynamic differs from 2020 when Russian regulators lifted a block on Telegram; now, Durov implies control from within the platform itself over the official accounts that persisted through that earlier blockade.

cryptonews.ru42 min fa

Will Terrorist Durov Ban Russian Officials?

cryptonews.ru42 min fa

Trading

Spot