JPMorgan Closes the 'Financial Backdoor': Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Face Compliance Reshuffle

比推Pubblicato 2025-12-29Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-29

Introduzione

JPMorgan Chase has recently frozen accounts linked to at least two fast-growing stablecoin startups, Blindpay and Kontigo, highlighting the risks cryptocurrency transactions pose to banks. These startups, backed by Y Combinator, primarily served Latin American markets, including Venezuela—a region under U.S. sanctions. The bank’s a surge in disputed transactions, such as chargebacks and fraud claims, triggered the freezes. Checkbook, a payments partner that provided these firms virtual account access to JPMorgan, noted that the startups failed to adequately verify their end customers' identities or ensure transaction legitimacy. While JPMorgan stated the action wasn’t due to the nature of stablecoin businesses, the incident underscores broader regulatory concerns. U.S. and global authorities have warned that stablecoins are being used for money laundering, terrorism financing, and other illicit activities. Both affected startups abruptly tightened compliance measures or terminated high-risk clients after the account closures.

Written by: Michael Roddan, Yueqi Yang

Compiled by: Block Unicorn

Original Title: Stablecoin Startups Bring Trouble to JPMorgan


JPMorgan has recently frozen accounts used by at least two fast-growing stablecoin startups in recent months, highlighting the risks that cryptocurrency transactions pose to banks, which must understand the customers they do business with and the sources of their funds.

These stablecoin startups operate in Venezuela and other regions where sanctions or other restrictions pose legal risks to banks. One of the stablecoin startups once claimed that customers did not need identity verification before transactions. Another startup, after JPMorgan froze its account, suddenly terminated all customers from high-risk countries, according to the company's communication records with customers.

Stablecoins have surged in popularity overseas, especially in countries with unstable economies and currencies. Last summer, the U.S. passed a stablecoin bill, giving this type of cryptocurrency pegged to the U.S. dollar legal status.

Individuals and businesses use stablecoins to obtain U.S. dollars and make overseas remittances. They need to establish connections with U.S. banks to convert cryptocurrencies into U.S. dollars. However, banks are cautious, fearing penalties from regulators even during the Trump administration, which supported cryptocurrencies. Global and U.S. regulators and law enforcement agencies have stated that stablecoins have been used to fund terrorist organizations, launder money, and engage in other criminal activities.

JPMorgan froze the accounts of two startups invested in by venture capital firm Y Combinator—Blindpay and Kontigo—both primarily focused on the Latin American market. These two companies connected with JPMorgan through the digital payment company Checkbook, which is also supported by JPMorgan and other institutions.

Blindpay has processed over $100 million in transactions. In August of this year, the company began offering an account through JPMorgan aimed at helping customers overcome barriers to entering the U.S. financial system. Blindpay stated in a blog post at the time that obtaining loans from U.S. banks was 'much harder than imagined.'

Later that day, JPMorgan and Checkbook froze Blindpay's account. According to a series of now-deleted blog posts on the company's website, the stablecoin company quickly began strengthening anti-money laundering measures and customer verification. Blindpay did not respond to requests for comment.

Last year, Checkbook joined JPMorgan's payment partner network, enabling Checkbook to process payments for its customers through JPMorgan. For this purpose, Checkbook creates virtual accounts for its customers at JPMorgan.

Virtual accounts allow fintech companies like Checkbook to quickly open U.S. dollar-denominated accounts for overseas customers and business clients, avoiding situations where they cannot access the U.S. banking system for various reasons. Under U.S. law, businesses opening bank accounts in the U.S. must provide proof of their operations in the U.S. and a physical U.S. address.

Virtual accounts have become a popular service offered by stablecoin companies like Blindpay. Checkbook's accounts have opened a backdoor for these small stablecoin companies to enter the U.S. financial system. Soon after, JPMorgan noticed a sharp increase in the number of disputed transactions (i.e., refunds and chargebacks). Chargebacks can arise from fraud, unauthorized use, and billing errors, especially when cardholders report identity theft or dispute purchases. It is unclear why these companies experienced a surge in disputed transactions. JPMorgan has contacted Checkbook for an explanation.

Checkbook CEO PJ Gupta stated that companies like Blindpay and Kontigo were among the reasons for the rise in chargeback rates. Gupta pointed out that these companies need to ensure that transactions processed through their systems are legitimate and valid and verify the identities of remitting customers. Gupta also mentioned that while Checkbook conducts customer due diligence on the stablecoin companies themselves, due diligence on the customers is the responsibility of these companies.

Gupta stated that when disputed transactions exceed a certain threshold, Checkbook and JPMorgan freeze customer accounts. 'In such cases, we suspend operations and conduct an analysis until we obtain assurances. We send the assurances to the bank, and if both the bank and we agree that the issue will not recur, we can reopen the account. If we cannot reach an agreement, we will not reopen the account,' Gupta said.

Gupta mentioned that transactions from stablecoin companies account for only a small portion of Checkbook's total transaction volume, which exceeds $1 billion per month. He stated that the disputed transactions that prompted JPMorgan's action were due to a large influx of customers using the services provided by stablecoin companies. 'It was entirely because they opened the floodgates, and a large number of people rushed in through the internet,' Gupta said, referring to the disputed transactions of these startups.

Venezuela Sanctions

JPMorgan stated that freezing the accounts of these stablecoin companies was not due to the nature of their business. 'This has nothing to do with stablecoin companies,' a JPMorgan spokesperson said. 'We provide banking services to stablecoin issuers and related businesses, and we recently facilitated the listing of a stablecoin issuer.' Beyond this, the bank declined to comment further.

Kontigo, which raised $20 million from several venture capital firms including Y Combinator and Founders Inc., is one of two cryptocurrency platforms authorized by Venezuelan regulators to operate in the country. Kontigo focuses on serving Venezuelan customers, and its founders claim the company has processed over $1 billion in transactions. Over the past two decades, the U.S. has imposed sanctions on certain sectors of Venezuela's economy, the government, and individuals, and President Donald Trump has been increasing pressure on Venezuela's ruling authorities.

In a promotional video released by Kontigo this month, the company claimed: 'In just 30 seconds, individuals and businesses worldwide can transact using USDC and USDT stablecoins without KYC (Know Your Customer). Users can link bank accounts and instantly transfer funds globally without limits.' Kontigo co-founder Jesus Castillo stated that customers do not need to submit identity verification for cryptocurrency transactions, but identity verification is required for transactions involving fiat currency.

According to Kontigo's communication records with customers, JPMorgan suddenly froze the company's account in November. Checkbook CEO Gupta stated that the account freeze was due to a significant increase in the number of disputed transactions. Castillo, however, said that his startup and other similar companies are facing issues caused by Checkbook.

The role Kontigo plays in transferring funds out of Venezuela was highlighted in a recent report by Transparencia Venezuela, the Venezuelan chapter of Transparency International. The report stated that users could deposit up to $100,000 into Kontigo's digital wallet through private banks in Venezuela without any identity checks on the depositor. Castillo called these claims false and stated that the company has filed a lawsuit against the nonprofit. Transparencia Venezuela did not comment.

He mentioned that Kontigo also uses Bridge, owned by Stripe, to provide virtual accounts for some of its users in the U.S. and Europe. Castillo did not respond to questions about Kontigo's compliance controls. Bridge declined to comment.

After JPMorgan froze Blindpay's account, the stablecoin company's CEO and co-founder Simon Moura and co-founder João Borges flew to San Francisco to meet with an investor from Y Combinator and search for a new payment processor or bank willing to work with them.

'Unfortunately, we were rejected by this promising payment processor because they are still reluctant to work with stablecoin companies,' Moura wrote in a now-deleted blog post. Moura also visited JPMorgan's office to explain how Blindpay operates.

Due to issues with due diligence, Blindpay's potential customer base appears to have significantly shrunk. First, the company stated in a later-deleted blog post that customers from 'high-risk countries' would need to 'undergo stricter KYC processes,' referring to the 'Know Your Customer' regulatory system applicable to banks. A few days later, Blindpay announced that, after a round of due diligence, all its virtual accounts and related crypto wallets had been closed.


Twitter: https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

BitPush TG Discussion Group: https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

BitPush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link: https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7598958

Domande pertinenti

QWhy did JPMorgan freeze the accounts of stablecoin startups like Blindpay and Kontigo?

AJPMorgan froze the accounts due to a significant increase in disputed transactions, such as chargebacks and refunds, which raised concerns about compliance and potential risks, including fraud and unauthorized use.

QWhat role did Checkbook play in the relationship between JPMorgan and the stablecoin startups?

ACheckbook, a digital payments company, acted as an intermediary by providing virtual accounts through JPMorgan, allowing stablecoin startups to access the U.S. financial system. However, Checkbook relied on the startups to conduct their own customer due diligence.

QHow did the stablecoin startups like Kontigo and Blindpay initially attract customers, and what compliance issues arose?

AKontigo initially advertised no KYC (Know Your Customer) requirements for cryptocurrency transactions, while Blindpay faced issues with inadequate identity verification. This led to compliance risks, including potential money laundering and violations of sanctions, especially in high-risk regions like Venezuela.

QWhat impact did the U.S. sanctions on Venezuela have on Kontigo's operations?

AKontigo, which focused on serving Venezuelan customers, faced challenges due to U.S. sanctions on Venezuela. Its role in facilitating fund transfers out of Venezuela drew scrutiny, as it was accused of allowing large deposits without proper identity verification, though the company denied these claims.

QWhat broader concerns do regulators and law enforcement agencies have regarding stablecoins?

ARegulators and law enforcement agencies worry that stablecoins are being used for illicit activities, such as funding terrorist organizations, money laundering, and other criminal endeavors, due to potential loopholes in compliance and verification processes.

Letture associate

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit1 h fa

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit1 h fa

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手1 h fa

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手1 h fa

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit3 h fa

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片