Japan’s Banking Giants Unite for Yen Stablecoin Launch

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-06-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-10

Introduzione

Three of Japan's largest banks — Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, and Mizuho Financial Group — will jointly issue a yen stablecoin by March, the end of the current financial year. They have formed a council to prepare for the launch, with the Japanese Financial Services Agency and the ruling Liberal Democratic Party expressing support. Yen-pegged stablecoins currently represent a minor part of the market, with JPYC being the most notable example. Separately, the New York State Department of Financial Services has proposed stringent new regulations for stablecoin issuers, focusing on stricter reserve custody rules, enhanced risk management, and mandatory executive certifications and audits.

Three of Japan’s largest banks said they will jointly issue a stablecoin this financial year, which ends in March. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG), Sumitomo ⁠Mitsui Financial Group (SMBC) and Mizuho Financial Group will establish a council to explore operational frameworks and prepare for the issuance of stablecoins, according to a statement on MUFG’s website.

The three banks will act as “joint settlors and a trust bank or similar institution will act as trustee,” the statement said. Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) signaled support for the development of a stablecoin by the three banks last November. More recently, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) said the state should promote the usage of yen-based stablecoins.

Tokens pegged to the yen represent a negligible share of the market, accounting for less than $50 million in the $311 billion sector. The most prominent is JPYC with a market cap of around $18 million, issued by a Tokyo-based fintech of the same name.

NYSD Pushes for Stringent Regulations

The New York State Department of Financial Services released a proposed regulation for authorized payment stablecoin issuers on June 9, The Block reported on June 10. The proposal would turn stablecoin guidance issued in 2022 into formal regulation and incorporate the GENIUS Act and follow-up federal rulemaking.

The biggest change covers custody of reserve assets. Stablecoin issuers would be required to hold reserves across multiple custodians. The proposal also introduces new redemption-related measures to prevent excessive concentration of reserves at a single custodian.

Risk-management obligations would also be strengthened. Issuers would need to establish frameworks covering security, internal controls and audits, insider trading, and oversight of external service providers.

A dual-authorization system would apply to reserve management. Each month, an issuer’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer would have to certify the accuracy of reserve composition reports. Each year, issuers would also need an attestation from an accounting firm on the effectiveness of internal controls.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

CertiK Backs Pharos AI Agent Hackathon With Security-Focused Skill Scanner

Domande pertinenti

QWhich three major Japanese banks have announced a joint initiative to issue a yen-pegged stablecoin?

AMitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG), Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (SMBC), and Mizuho Financial Group.

QWhat is the current market share of yen-pegged stablecoins in the overall stablecoin market, according to the article?

AIt is a negligible share, accounting for less than $50 million in the $311 billion stablecoin sector.

QWhat role will a trust bank or similar institution play in the Japanese banks' stablecoin issuance plan?

AIt will act as the trustee, while the three banks will act as joint settlors.

QWhat major change did the New York State Department of Financial Services propose regarding stablecoin reserve assets?

AIt proposed that stablecoin issuers be required to hold reserves across multiple custodians to prevent excessive concentration at a single custodian.

QAccording to the article, which political party in Japan recently stated that the state should promote the usage of yen-based stablecoins?

AThe ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP).

Letture associate

No Sales Team, $20 Million in Revenue: How Did AI Employee Viktor Win Over 30,000 Companies?

The AI employee Viktor, developed by a team with DeepMind background, has achieved $20 million in annual revenue without a traditional sales team, serving over 30,000 companies. Its core innovation lies in positioning itself as a "Tier 3 AI Coworker" capable of "end-to-end execution and delivery of results," moving beyond the "draft and wait for human completion" model of typical AI assistants. Users can simply mention Viktor in Slack or Microsoft Teams using natural language commands, and it autonomously performs tasks like pulling sales data from a CRM, generating reports, or even cross-tool operations like creating board meeting PPTs by aggregating data from six different sources. Key to its growth is a pure Product-Led Growth (PLG) model, eliminating complex implementation cycles and per-seat licensing. Instead, it charges based on task credits or consumption, lowering the trial barrier with a $100 free credit offer and no credit card required. This enabled viral, bottom-up adoption within organizations. Viktor's interaction paradigm removes the barrier of prompt engineering, allowing non-technical employees to delegate complex workflows seamlessly. It also features proactive, automated task execution (e.g., overnight bookkeeping, scheduled reports) based on triggers, effectively embedding AI as an automated "process layer" within business operations. However, its expansion into Microsoft Teams—a platform with 320 million users—highlights challenges. Large enterprises require stringent IT compliance, security reviews (e.g., SOC 2), and governance, potentially hindering the frictionless, user-driven adoption that succeeded in Slack. Additionally, the "black box" nature of its autonomous decision-making raises concerns about operational risks, data integrity, and the need for robust audit logs and permission controls. Balancing efficiency gains with security and trust remains a critical hurdle for Viktor and similar AI agents aiming to become core enterprise infrastructure.

marsbit16 min fa

No Sales Team, $20 Million in Revenue: How Did AI Employee Viktor Win Over 30,000 Companies?

marsbit16 min fa

Interview with CoreWeave Co-founders: AI Demand Seems to 'Intensify' Every Day

An Interview with CoreWeave Executives: AI Demand Seems to 'Intensify' Every Day In an interview, CoreWeave executives highlight a structural shift in AI infrastructure demand. While GPU availability remains crucial, the primary bottlenecks are evolving to include powered data center shells, skilled labor (like electricians), and complex supply chain execution. They note that AI demand, particularly for agentic AI and reasoning models, continues to intensify daily, accelerating since Q1 2024. This demand is driving a need for more balanced infrastructure. CoreWeave is redesigning data centers to allocate more space for storage and CPUs alongside GPUs, with significant interest in Nvidia's upcoming Vera CPUs. The company, serving top AI labs and hyperscalers, emphasizes its client-driven model, building precisely to customer specifications. CoreWeave attributes its competitive edge to proven execution, performance, and a mature platform for AI deployment. Pricing is structured to pass component cost increases (e.g., for HBM memory) to customers, protecting margins. Looking ahead, they anticipate Vera Rubin platform deployments to begin meaningfully in late 2025, with a major ramp throughout 2027, mirroring the Blackwell (GB) series rollout pattern. The competition is shifting from merely acquiring chips to holistic engineering and delivery capability.

marsbit34 min fa

Interview with CoreWeave Co-founders: AI Demand Seems to 'Intensify' Every Day

marsbit34 min fa

Manus Buyback Plan Emerges: Chinese Investors Plan to Repurchase Equity with $2 Billion, Path to Hong Kong IPO Becomes Clearer

According to a report by The Information, early Chinese investors of Manus, including Tencent, Sequoia Capital China, and ZhenFund, are planning to repurchase the company from Meta for $2 billion—the same price Meta paid in its acquisition last December. This move is a direct response to the Chinese government's prohibition of the foreign acquisition in April. As part of the repurchase plan, Manus is considering establishing a Sino-foreign joint venture within China. This structure is seen as a way to ensure regulatory compliance for its Chinese investors and to pave the way for a future IPO in Hong Kong. Notably, U.S. investor Benchmark will not participate in the buyback, which will concentrate ownership even more among Chinese capital. Since its acquisition by Meta, Manus's business has grown rapidly, with its annualized revenue run rate reportedly increasing four-to-fivefold to $400-$500 million in roughly six months. This strong growth underpins the investors' willingness to repurchase at the original price. Financially, the forced unwinding of the deal may benefit the early investors, allowing them to regain equity at a cost far below the company's current implied valuation, with the added prospect of an independent future listing. However, specific terms of the repurchase, including funding proportions and the joint venture's equity structure, are still under negotiation. This "repurchase-joint venture-Hong Kong IPO" approach could serve as a reference model for other Chinese AI startups navigating cross-border M&A regulations.

marsbit43 min fa

Manus Buyback Plan Emerges: Chinese Investors Plan to Repurchase Equity with $2 Billion, Path to Hong Kong IPO Becomes Clearer

marsbit43 min fa

STRC Loses Peg by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Running?

The article discusses the significant and concerning depegging of MicroStrategy's (MSTR) preferred stock, STRC. Designed to trade near its $100 target par value, STRC has recently fallen sharply, reaching a low of $83.26 and closing at $88.59, representing an over 11% discount. STRC is a core component of MicroStrategy's financial strategy. As a perpetual preferred stock, it allows the company to raise capital through an "at-the-market" (ATM) issuance program without diluting common shareholders (MSTR). This capital is primarily used to purchase Bitcoin, creating a "capital flywheel": issuing STRC → raising cash → buying BTC → increasing net assets → supporting STRC's value. The flywheel's operation depends on STRC maintaining its $100 price. To enforce this, MicroStrategy employs a dynamic dividend mechanism, recently raising the rate to 11.5% and increasing payout frequency. However, this has failed to halt the depegging, indicating market concerns extend beyond yield. Analysts cite two main reasons. First, technical factors like forced liquidations from leveraged arbitrage trades may have exacerbated the sell-off. Second, and more fundamentally, is waning confidence in MicroStrategy's financial resilience. A JPMorgan report highlighted the company's limited cash relative to its ~$1.7 billion annual dividend obligation, raising liquidity concerns. While MicroStrategy counters that its massive Bitcoin holdings provide decades of coverage, this argument relies on the potential need to sell BTC—a departure from its long-standing "never sell" narrative. The company's recent sale of a small amount of Bitcoin for "testing," despite being framed as minor, has intensified these fears. The persistent depegging threatens to cripple MicroStrategy's primary funding channel. If STRC remains discounted, the company's ability to fund further Bitcoin purchases weakens. Should cash reserves dwindle while financing is constrained, the market may increasingly price in the risk of MicroStrategy becoming a forced seller of Bitcoin to meet obligations. This shift from a major marginal buyer to a potential seller could pose significant downside risk to the broader Bitcoin market.

链捕手52 min fa

STRC Loses Peg by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Running?

链捕手52 min fa

Altcoins Face Deepest Spot Sell Pressure Since 2020, CryptoQuant Data Shows

Altcoins are enduring one of their most severe periods of spot-market selling pressure since 2020, according to CryptoQuant data, with a cumulative buy/sell volume gap of roughly $209 billion. This reflects weak retail demand, a rotation into safer assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoin yield products, and broad investor caution. While such extreme selling can set the stage for a contrarian opportunity by showing one-sided positioning, the data does not yet signal an immediate reversal or altcoin season. The market remains in a defensive state, lacking the sustained spot accumulation and broad sector improvement needed for a confirmed bullish turn.

bitcoinist1 h fa

Altcoins Face Deepest Spot Sell Pressure Since 2020, CryptoQuant Data Shows

bitcoinist1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures