Japan Tightens Crypto Regulations Again! FSA and National Police Agency Jointly Issue 11 New Anti-Fraud Measures

marsbitPubblicato 2026-08-07Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-07

Introduzione

Japanese financial authorities have intensified cryptocurrency anti-fraud measures. The Financial Services Agency (FSA), in collaboration with the National Police Agency, has issued 11 new binding requirements to the Japan Virtual and Crypto assets Exchange Association (JVCEA), applying to all exchanges regardless of size. This crackdown is a direct response to a surge in sophisticated scams, including social media investment fraud and "pig butchering" romance scams, where illicit proceeds are increasingly funneled through exchange accounts. Key regulations include mandatory verification of user identity documents during account opening, explicit warnings against account sales, and temporary withdrawal restrictions for new deposits or crypto purchases. A critical new rule introduces a pre-registration system for withdrawal addresses, requiring checks for fraud linkages and an initial holding period. Withdrawal limits will be set based on user risk profiles and must be raised cautiously. Exchanges must also enhance transaction monitoring to detect patterns linked to prevalent scams and block transactions inconsistent with an account's stated purpose. Upon identifying suspicious activity, platforms must immediately restrict or freeze accounts. Additional mandates involve enforcing multi-factor authentication for suspected impersonation and verifying sender names. The FSA also demands faster information sharing and cooperation with local police. While some system upgrades may...

Author: CoinPost

According to a report by Japanese cryptocurrency media CoinPost, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) of Japan, in collaboration with the National Police Agency, officially requested the Japan Virtual and Crypto assets Exchange Association (JVCEA) to strengthen its efforts in preventing virtual currency fraud cases on August 6th.

Content of the New Anti-Fraud Measures

On the 6th, the FSA, jointly with the National Police Agency, submitted a request to the JVCEA, proposing 11 new regulations covering areas such as a withdrawal address pre-registration system and enhanced transaction monitoring. All exchanges, regardless of their size, are subject to these new requirements.

The push behind this move is the persistent rise in cases of investment solicitation scams and "pig butchering" romance scams conducted through social media platforms. Although financial institutions have long taken countermeasures, fraudulent tactics have become increasingly sophisticated and complex, with cases even emerging where illicit funds flow directly into exchange accounts.

Dual Approach: Identity Verification and Withdrawal Restrictions

The new regulations require exchanges to establish more robust mechanisms to verify the authenticity of identity documents submitted during account opening and to clearly inform users that buying or selling accounts is illegal. Furthermore, users will have their withdrawals restricted for a certain period after completing a fiat deposit or purchasing virtual currency.

Regarding withdrawal addresses, the FSA demands the introduction of a pre-registration system: newly registered withdrawal addresses must first be checked for any association with fraud cases before a restricted period is set. Additionally, exchanges must set withdrawal limits based on user risk assessment results and transaction purposes, and any increase in limits must be handled with extra caution.

Enhanced Transaction Monitoring and Closer Cooperation with Police

In terms of transaction monitoring, the new rules require exchanges to promptly adjust their detection strategies in response to the recent high-frequency fraud methods, strengthening the identification of anomalous transactions inconsistent with account purposes. Once suspicious transactions are detected, measures such as restricting transactions or freezing accounts must be taken immediately.

Other requirements include: mandating multi-factor authentication when identity impersonation is suspected, verifying the consistency between the remitter's name and the account holder's real name, among others. The FSA also requires exchanges to establish rapid information-sharing and collaboration mechanisms with local police authorities. For projects that require system modifications and are difficult to implement in the short term, the FSA stated that phased implementation according to plan is acceptable.

Domande pertinenti

QWhich two Japanese authorities jointly issued the 11 new anti-fraud regulations for cryptocurrency?

AThe Financial Services Agency (FSA) and the National Police Agency (NPA) of Japan jointly issued the regulations.

QTo which industry association were the 11 new anti-fraud measures formally directed?

AThe measures were formally directed to the Japan Virtual and Crypto assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).

QWhat are two specific user-facing requirements under the new regulations regarding withdrawals?

AThe regulations require the introduction of a pre-registration system for withdrawal addresses and allow for withdrawal limits based on user risk assessment. They also impose a waiting period before withdrawals can be made after a fiat deposit or crypto purchase.

QAccording to the article, what is a primary reason behind the issuance of these new regulations?

AThe primary reason is the continuous rise in investment solicitation scams via social media and romance scams ('pig butchering' scams), with illicit funds increasingly flowing directly into exchange accounts.

QWhat must exchanges do when they detect suspicious transactions under the new rules?

AExchanges must immediately take measures such as restricting transactions or freezing the account when suspicious transactions are detected.

Letture associate

Dark Pools Prevail, Whales Vanish: How Credible Are Public Market Signals?

Institutional cryptocurrency trading is increasingly shifting towards dark pools and over-the-counter (OTC) desks, with data from sFOX showing such venues accounted for 15% of total monthly volume by June, up from negligible levels in April. In July, 77.7% of institutional capital on sFOX's platform was routed through OTC desks, while only 18.4% went to public exchanges. A key driver is institutions' need to conceal large orders to avoid revealing trading patterns, preventing front-running and minimizing price impact. Firms like Jane Street and Citadel use dark pools and order-splitting across multiple venues to execute trades discreetly. This structural shift mirrors earlier developments in equities and forex markets. As a result, public order books now reflect only a fraction of actual market activity, eroding the once-significant advantage retail traders had in tracking large wallets and exchange flows. The proliferation of prime brokers and aggregation platforms is also rapidly closing simple arbitrage opportunities. The market may evolve toward a brokerage model for retail, similar to traditional stocks. Two scenarios emerge: an optimistic one where retail gains from narrower spreads and better order routing, and a pessimistic one where transparency declines faster than benefits trickle down, leaving smaller investors in the dark. Regardless, traders must adapt by not relying solely on exchange volume, comparing total execution costs, and using limit orders in thin markets. While reduced volatility from hidden large trades may seem positive, it comes at the cost of obscured market signals and institutional intent.

marsbit6 min fa

Dark Pools Prevail, Whales Vanish: How Credible Are Public Market Signals?

marsbit6 min fa

Is the AI Storage Chip Market at Its Peak Now, or Hitting a Bottom for Bargain Hunting?

The article analyzes the current state of the AI memory chip sector, questioning whether it has peaked or bottomed for a potential investment entry. It highlights a market dilemma following strong Q4 earnings from SanDisk and Western Digital, where both companies reported explosive revenue and profit growth. Despite this, their stock prices fell, signaling a "sell the news" event where future growth expectations, not current profits, are being priced in. This is identified as a potential early warning sign of a sector peak—valuations may have topped out on expectations, even if fundamental metrics like revenue have not. The piece advises against immediate heavy investment ("all-in"), drawing parallels to Nvidia's historical trajectory. After its AI-driven surge, Nvidia's stock entered a prolonged consolidation phase once its毛利率 (gross margin) growth peaked. The author suggests that for memory stocks, which have seen similar dramatic runs, a true buying opportunity may only emerge later, after signals like slowing price increases, declining gross margins, or reduced cloud provider orders confirm a fundamental downturn. In conclusion, the sector is described as being in an ambiguous, high-volatility phase—too early for a major bullish bet but risky to short. The article suggests using tools like options for limited-risk exposure during this uncertain period, reserving more aggressive strategies like margin trading for after clearer bottoming signals appear. A standard investment disclaimer is included.

marsbit26 min fa

Is the AI Storage Chip Market at Its Peak Now, or Hitting a Bottom for Bargain Hunting?

marsbit26 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片