Is Shiba Inu About to Repeat Its Bearish Playbook Again This Month?

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2025-12-26Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-26

Introduzione

Shiba Inu is on track to repeat its typical bearish December performance, declining 14.15% so far in December 2025 with only five days remaining. Historical trends show SHIB often struggles in the final month of the year, with significant losses in December 2021 (29.5%), 2022 (13.5%), and 2024 (21%). The only exception was a 24.6% gain in December 2023. To finish this month positively, SHIB would need to rally approximately 16.64% from current levels, reaching at least $0.0000084.

Shiba Inu is on track to repeat its bearish December performance as the month draws to a close. With only five days remaining in December 2025, the meme coin has declined 14.15% and shows limited signs of recovery. The pattern reinforces historical trends that have seen SHIB struggle during the year’s final month.

The fourth quarter of 2025 has proven difficult for Shiba Inu holders amid broader cryptocurrency market weakness. This downward pressure extended into December, with the token losing value consistently throughout the month. Historical data reveals December has frequently been an unfavorable period for SHIB price action.

Historical December performance shows consistent losses

December 2021 saw Shiba Inu close down 29.5% as investors took profits following the 2021 bull run. The token had achieved massive gains earlier in the year, prompting holders to exit positions during the final month.

December 2022 brought another 13.5% decline. The FTX exchange collapse in November triggered widespread panic across crypto markets, with billions wiped from total market capitalization. SHIB continued declining through December as investors reduced risk exposure.

December 2023 provided the only exception to this bearish pattern. Shiba Inu closed that month with a 24.6% gain, delivering double-digit returns that defied the historical trend. Many investors anticipated this positive performance would continue into the following year.

Instead, December 2024 reversed course with a 21% decline. Investors locked in gains after SHIB rallied to $0.000033 during the post-election surge earlier that month. Profit-taking pressure overwhelmed buying demand as the year concluded.

Current month mirrors bearish December trend

December 2025 is following the established pattern of negative performance. Shiba Inu opened the month trading at $0.000008385 and has already fallen close to 14%.

For SHIB to finish December in positive territory, the price must climb to at least $0.0000084 within the remaining five days. This would require a rally of approximately 16.64% from current levels.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the current performance trend of Shiba Inu in December 2025?

AShiba Inu is declining, having fallen 14.15% so far in December 2025, and is on track to repeat its historical bearish performance for the month.

QWhich previous December was the only exception to Shiba Inu's typical bearish trend?

ADecember 2023 was the only exception, as Shiba Inu closed that month with a 24.6% gain.

QWhat major event in November 2022 contributed to Shiba Inu's decline that continued into December?

AThe collapse of the FTX exchange in November 2022 triggered widespread panic across crypto markets, leading to a 13.5% decline for SHIB in December as investors reduced risk exposure.

QHow much does Shiba Inu need to rally in the remaining days to finish December 2025 in positive territory?

AShiba Inu needs to rally approximately 16.64% from its current level to reach at least $0.0000084 and finish December in positive territory.

QWhat was cited as the reason for Shiba Inu's 21% decline in December 2024?

AThe decline was due to investors locking in gains after SHIB rallied to $0.000033 during the post-election surge earlier that month, with profit-taking pressure overwhelming buying demand.

Letture associate

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbit7 min fa

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbit7 min fa

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

In late 2020, Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was effectively dismissed following a conflict over a 14-page, unpublished research paper she co-authored titled "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots." The paper, which has since been cited over 14,000 times, raised critical early warnings about the risks of large language models (LLMs). It argued that these models, trained on vast, biased internet data, are essentially "stochastic parrots" that mimic language without true understanding, potentially amplifying societal biases, generating plausible but false information (later termed "AI hallucination"), consuming massive energy, and obscuring their training data contents. Gebru's stance led to a clash with Google management, who requested the paper's withdrawal. Her subsequent internal criticism of the company's diversity efforts and handling of the matter culminated in her termination, which sparked protests from over 4,000 Google employees and researchers. Six years later, the paper's predictions have proven remarkably prescient. Issues like AI hallucination, embedded bias (evident in resume screening and healthcare algorithms), soaring energy consumption from AI data centers, unvetted training data containing harmful content, and the risk of "model collapse" from AI-generated internet content have become central industry challenges. The incident also highlighted concerns about AI development being driven primarily by commercial competition within a handful of powerful tech companies, often at the expense of ethical considerations. After leaving Google, Gebru founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) to explore these issues independently. The controversy underscores how her early, critical insights into the fundamental limitations and societal impacts of LLMs anticipated many of the most pressing dilemmas in today's AI era.

marsbit8 min fa

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

marsbit8 min fa

Elderly Borrow Money to Trade Stocks, Entire Nation Adds Leverage: 'Ant Army' Panics as South Korean Stock Market Plunges

Titled "Panic Among 'Ant Army' as South Korean Stocks Plunge After Elders Borrow to Invest, Everyone Leverages Up," this article details a dramatic reversal in South Korea's red-hot stock market. After a sustained rally toward 9,000 points driven by AI semiconductor hype, the KOSPI index recently crashed, triggering circuit breakers. The sell-off was led by major chipmakers Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, whose combined weight in the index is over 50%. The plunge exposed the extreme leverage and speculative behavior that fueled the boom. Individual investors, dubbed the "ant army," had borrowed heavily or used leverage ETFs to chase gains, with trading accounts outnumbering the population. A significant portion of this leveraged money came from older citizens, some of whom reportedly cashed out insurance policies to invest. ETF trading became dominated (over 90%) by high-risk leveraged and inverse products. The correction was triggered by a pullback in U.S. tech stocks, leading to a foreign capital exodus and a weakening Korean won, creating a vicious cycle. While President Lee Jae-myung attempted to reassure markets and NVIDIA's CEO signaled support during a visit, officials like Finance Minister Ju Yeong-geun expressed concern over the dangerous "herd mentality." The article highlights a pervasive, high-risk investment culture where everyone from office workers to retirees and even parents opening accounts for newborns sought quick profits, largely concentrated in a few tech stocks, setting the stage for a sharp and painful correction.

marsbit14 min fa

Elderly Borrow Money to Trade Stocks, Entire Nation Adds Leverage: 'Ant Army' Panics as South Korean Stock Market Plunges

marsbit14 min fa

From Hunyuan to WeChat AI: Tencent's Slow Paced Journey Reaches the Delivery Juncture

On June 8, 2026, WeChat's developer platform announced the internal testing of "WeChat AI," an AI assistant integrated into the WeChat ecosystem. It allows users to invoke, access, and operate Mini Programs through natural language conversation. The platform offers two access modes: an "Automatic Mode" where developers authorize platform access to their source code for zero-configuration AI operation, and a "Developer Mode" for building custom skills. While the name "WeChat AI" is provisional, this marks WeChat's first step in opening its vast Mini Program ecosystem—comprising over 400,000 developers and hundreds of millions of daily active users—to AI-driven conversational interaction. This move represents the latest step in Tencent's deliberate AI strategy, moving from technical R&D and standalone product validation to integration within its super-app. The underlying foundation is Tencent's self-developed Hunyuan large language model. Ranked first domestically in application-oriented capabilities like Agent task execution in 2025, Hunyuan's focus on stability and precision over raw parameter count aligns with WeChat AI's need for reliable, low-latency operations involving sensitive tasks like payments and bookings. Prior C-side validation came from "Yuanbao," a standalone AI app whose Monthly Active Users (MAU) surpassed 114 million during the 2026 Chinese New Year红包 campaign, though daily activity later subsided. This "pulse growth" highlighted the challenge of user retention for standalone apps, informing the decision to integrate AI natively into WeChat's high-frequency scenarios. However, WeChat AI's "Automatic Mode," which requires source code access, raises developer concerns about code security, data visibility, and liability for AI errors. A deeper, ecosystem-level tension exists between the efficiency of centralized AI task调度 and the potential "short-circuiting" of merchant pages, which could erode their branding, advertising revenue, and user engagement. As Tencent Chairman Pony Ma noted, balancing centralized AI调度 with the protection of decentralized merchant traffic is a core challenge. In summary, Tencent's AI path—comprising the stable Hunyuan base model, the user-validated Yuanbao app, and the newly testing WeChat AI integration—is logically coherent. The success of WeChat AI now hinges on resolving developer trust, establishing fair ecosystem rules for merchants, and ensuring operational reliability to gain user confidence for deep, transactional use.

marsbit14 min fa

From Hunyuan to WeChat AI: Tencent's Slow Paced Journey Reaches the Delivery Juncture

marsbit14 min fa

STRC Briefly Fell Below $91: Will Strategy Be Hunted by 'Market Fear'?

The article draws a parallel between FTX's 2022 collapse and the current situation facing MicroStrategy (Strategy), a major corporate holder of Bitcoin. The author argues that MicroStrategy's financial model, heavily reliant on issuing equity and convertible debt at a premium to its Bitcoin holdings, is under stress. The core issue is the compression of MSTR's stock premium over its Bitcoin holdings (NAV). This erodes the viability of its "flywheel" – using equity sales to buy more Bitcoin. The company has shifted towards preferred shares (like STRC) and debt to raise capital, incurring significant dividend and interest obligations (approximately $1.7 billion annually). With cash reserves dwindling and debt maturities looming, MicroStrategy faces mounting pressure to generate cash. The article outlines three problematic options: 1) cutting preferred dividends, damaging investor confidence; 2) issuing more MSTR stock at low premiums, diluting existing shareholders; or 3) selling Bitcoin, which founder Michael Saylor had vowed against but recently did in a small symbolic transaction. The author suggests that, like FTX, a crisis of confidence could trigger a rapid downward spiral as investors flee. While noting Saylor's actions are legal—unlike SBF's fraud at FTX—the article warns the structural risk born from financial engineering and over-leverage is significant. The preferred path out is a sharp rise in Bitcoin's price to restart the premium flywheel, but this would only create a larger, more complex system vulnerable to future failure. The author concludes by advocating for direct Bitcoin ownership over exposure through MicroStrategy's increasingly risky financial structure.

Foresight News29 min fa

STRC Briefly Fell Below $91: Will Strategy Be Hunted by 'Market Fear'?

Foresight News29 min fa

Trading

Spot

Futures