Is It Time To Give Up On Dogecoin And Shiba Inu? On-Chain Metrics Has Answers

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-03-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-02

Introduzione

The on-chain metrics for Dogecoin (DOGE) and Shiba Inu (SHIB) indicate a strong bearish sentiment amid a broader crypto market downturn. Dogecoin's Price Daily Active Addresses (DAA) divergence has fallen to -49%, a two-month low, reflecting weak demand as its price dropped below $0.10. Its daily active addresses have significantly declined, with seven-day totals under 300,000. Similarly, Shiba Inu's Price DAA divergence is at -29%, its lowest this year, with active addresses remaining below 10,000 since January. Derivatives data also show reduced trading volumes and open interest for both meme coins, with a short-biased market sentiment. Further declines are possible due to ongoing market uncertainty and geopolitical tensions.

Dogecoin and Shiba Inu are currently facing bearish sentiment due to the crypto market downtrend. On-chain metrics also highlight the current sentiment, with market participants choosing to stay on the sidelines amid this downtrend.

On-chain Metrics Signal Bearish Sentiment Towards Dogecoin and Shiba Inu

Santiment data shows that Dogecoin’s Price Daily Active Addresses (DAA) divergence has dropped to -49%, signaling weak demand in the meme coin’s ecosystem even as price continues to drop. This figure marks a two-month low for DOGE and comes amid its recent drop below the psychological $0.10 level.

Furthermore, the Daily Active Addresses on the Dogecoin network continue to waver. Data from Santiment shows that the DAA on the network dropped from as high as 87,727 on January 31 to as low as 38,696 on February 28. The total Active addresses over the last seven days are below 300,000, which also signals the low demand for the meme coin at the moment.

Source: chart from Santiment

Like Dogecoin, Shiba Inu is also facing weaker demand amid the recent price downtrend. Santiment data shows that the Price DAA Divergence has dropped to -29%, the lowest level this year. This notably coincides with SHIB’s decline to its lowest level this year, with the meme coin now down 25% year-to-date (YTD).

Shiba Inu’s Daily Active Addresses have also remained flat since the start of the year, indicating that investors are opting against investing in the second-largest meme coin by market cap. For context, SHIB’s DAA on March 1 was just 1,984, down from the multi-month high of 377,000 recorded in October last year. Since the start of this year, the Daily Active Addresses have remained below 10,000.

It is worth noting that Dogecoin and Shiba Inu remain at risk of further declines as tensions between the U.S. and Iran escalate. Further declines in these meme coins are likely to lead to a drop in these on-chain metrics as market participants stay on the sidelines amid this uncertainty.

Derivatives Metrics In The Red As Traders Sit On The Sidelines

Dogecoin and Shiba Inu’s derivatives metrics are also in the red as crypto traders sit on the sidelines amid the current market sell-off. CoinGlass data shows that DOGE’s derivatives trading volume is down by over 34% down to $2.36 billion. Open interest is down over 9%, dropping to $907 million, while options trading volume has crashed 31%. The long/short ratio is below 1, signaling that most traders are shorting DOGE at the moment.

Similarly, Shiba Inu’s derivative metrics signal that sellers are currently dominating the market, as bulls remain cautious amid market uncertainty. CoinGlass data shows that SHIB’s derivative trading volume has crashed 28%, down to $132 million, while open interest is down to $54 million.

DOGE trading at $0.09 on the 1D chart | Source: DOGEUSDT on Tradingview.com

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the current Price Daily Active Addresses (DAA) divergence for Dogecoin, and what does it indicate?

ADogecoin's Price Daily Active Addresses (DAA) divergence has dropped to -49%, signaling weak demand in the meme coin's ecosystem.

QHow have Shiba Inu's Daily Active Addresses (DAA) performed since the start of the year?

AShiba Inu's Daily Active Addresses have remained flat and below 10,000 since the start of the year, indicating low investor interest.

QAccording to the derivatives data, what does a long/short ratio below 1 for Dogecoin signify?

AA long/short ratio below 1 for Dogecoin signifies that the majority of traders are currently shorting the asset.

QWhat external factor is mentioned as a risk that could lead to further declines for Dogecoin and Shiba Inu?

AEscalating tensions between the U.S. and Iran are mentioned as a risk that could lead to further declines for these meme coins.

QHow much has Shiba Inu's derivative trading volume decreased, according to CoinGlass data?

AShiba Inu's derivative trading volume has crashed by 28%, down to $132 million.

Letture associate

Pricing OpenAI Pre-IPO: A New, Life-or-Death Business on Hyperliquid Lasting Half a Year

Pricing OpenAI Pre-IPO: Hyperliquid's High-Stakes, Six-Month Business Venture The article analyzes the nascent market for pre-IPO perpetual contracts on the Hyperliquid blockchain, exemplified by two contrasting teams: Trade.xyz and Ventuals. Trade.xyz, an anonymous team, successfully built the largest pre-market on Hyperliquid. Its strategy focused on near-term events, like the SpaceX IPO. By listing a SpaceX contract with a known launch date and price, the market had a tangible "anchor" (the eventual Nasdaq opening price) to converge upon, which kept speculation in check. This approach fueled significant growth. In stark contrast, Ventuals, backed by Paradigm, failed despite holding coveted contracts for OpenAI and Anthropic. Its critical flaw was its pricing mechanism for these companies, which have no imminent IPO. Ventuals' oracle price was half-derived from infrequent private market transactions and half from its own contract's moving average. This created a self-reinforcing loop where buying pressure artificially inflated the price, disconnecting it from real supply and demand. The market became illiquid and structurally skewed. Ventuals shut down nine months after launch, reportedly through an acquisition. Its final settlement prices—OpenAI at ~$1,341 and Anthropic at ~$1,618—were thus partially products of its flawed model. Ironically, some company employees and late-stage VCs reportedly used these prices for valuation reference, highlighting the desperate demand for price discovery in opaque private markets. The failure of Ventuals exposes the core challenge of this business: price for illiquid, non-public assets requires a robust, self-correcting market, which is absent without a definitive public listing event. Nevertheless, demand is driving major players like Coinbase and traditional finance (e.g., Citi) to enter the space, aiming to provide 24/7 trading for coveted private company shares. The venture's ultimate viability, however, hinges on solving the fundamental pricing problem Ventuals could not.

marsbit1 h fa

Pricing OpenAI Pre-IPO: A New, Life-or-Death Business on Hyperliquid Lasting Half a Year

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片