Iran Turns To USDT, Acquiring $507 Million To Defend Its Currency

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-01-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-23

Introduzione

Iran's central bank acquired at least $507 million in Tether (USDT) in 2025 to defend its currency, the rial, and evade sanctions, according to blockchain analysis by Elliptic. The funds, a conservative estimate, were used to add dollar-linked liquidity to local crypto markets and support international trade. Transactions were initially routed through Iran's largest exchange, Nobitex, before shifting to cross-chain bridges and decentralized exchanges after increased scrutiny. In June 2025, Tether froze $37 million in USDT from wallets linked to the bank, demonstrating a key vulnerability. This case highlights how state actors use stablecoins to bypass traditional banking restrictions, while creating a public, traceable record of their activities.

Iran’s central bank quietly built up a large stash of Tether’s USDT last year as the rial struggled and trade with the outside world grew harder. The move turned parts of the crypto ledger into a public trail of a policy that would normally be private.

Central Bank’s Crypto Moves

According to a blockchain analysis by Elliptic, the Central Bank of Iran acquired at least $507 million in USDT over 2025, a figure the firm treats as a conservative minimum because it only counts wallets it could tie to the bank with high confidence.

Reports say much of the buying happened in the spring months of 2025 and that payments were routed through channels that included Emirati dirhams and public blockchains. Those stablecoins were then used in local crypto markets to add dollar-linked liquidity and help slow the rial’s slide.

How The Money Flowed

Elliptic’s tracing shows an early flow of USDT into Nobitex, Iran’s biggest crypto exchange, where the coins could be swapped into rials and fed into the market. After a breach and growing scrutiny in mid-2025, other paths were used, including cross-chain bridges and decentralized exchanges, to move and convert funds.

Source: Elliptic

A Freeze And A Warning

That open ledger also left the transactions visible to outside observers. On June 15, 2025, Tether blacklisted several wallets linked to the central bank and froze about $37 million in USDT, showing that stablecoins can be cut off when issuers or regulators step in. That intervention narrowed some options for on-chain liquidity.

Total crypto market cap currently at $2.99 trillion. Chart: TradingView

This episode matters for two reasons. First, it shows how a state institution can use stablecoins to gain access to dollar value when normal banking routes are closed.

Second, it highlights a weakness: if a private issuer can freeze balances, those reserves are not the same as cash held in hard foreign accounts.

Trade, Sanctions, And A New Tool

Reports note the purchases likely served a twin goal — to smooth domestic exchange rates and to help settle trade with partners who avoid direct dollar banking.

The method is blunt. It gives a way to move value, but it also creates new points of control and exposure that can be tracked on public ledgers.

Analysts will be watching how regulators and stablecoin issuers respond. They will also track whether other countries under pressure turn to similar mixes of centralized and decentralized tools.

The public tracing of these flows makes it harder to hide big moves, even when actors try to obscure them across chains and exchanges.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Domande pertinenti

QHow much USDT did Iran's central bank acquire in 2025 according to Elliptic's analysis?

AIran's central bank acquired at least $507 million in USDT in 2025.

QWhat was the primary purpose of Iran acquiring such a large amount of USDT?

AThe primary purpose was to add dollar-linked liquidity to the local market to help slow the Iranian rial's slide and to potentially settle trade with partners avoiding direct dollar banking.

QWhich crypto exchange was initially used to swap the acquired USDT into Iranian rials?

AThe initial flow of USDT was into Nobitex, Iran's biggest crypto exchange, to be swapped into rials.

QWhat action did Tether take on June 15, 2025, regarding Iran's activities?

AOn June 15, 2025, Tether blacklisted several wallets linked to the Iranian central bank and froze about $37 million in USDT.

QWhat are the two main reasons why this episode is significant according to the article?

AFirst, it shows how a state institution can use stablecoins to access dollar value when normal banking routes are closed. Second, it highlights the weakness that a private issuer can freeze balances, making these reserves not the same as cash held in hard foreign accounts.

Letture associate

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit2 h fa

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit2 h fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit3 h fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片