Inside the Fed, Hawkish Sentiments Strengthen: Three Members Explain Why They Want an Interest Rate Hike!

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-07-31Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-31

Introduzione

Although the U.S. Federal Reserve held interest rates steady as expected in July, several officials dissented, advocating for an increase. Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack argued that high inflation is likely persistent and won't spontaneously fall to the 2% target, warning that delays could necessitate more aggressive future hikes. Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari emphasized the risk of inflation becoming entrenched, favoring a gradual tightening approach. He suggested small, preemptive steps would allow the Fed to better manage the economic impact compared to waiting and potentially needing harsher measures later. Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan also supported a rate hike, stressing the need for immediate action to address high inflation. All three officials had similarly opposed the decision to pause rate hikes at the Fed's April meeting.

As is known, the U.S. Federal Reserve System (Fed) announced its long-awaited July decision and, as expected, kept the interest rate unchanged. However, some Fed members opposed the decision to leave it unchanged.

Cleveland Federal Reserve Bank President Beth Hammack was one such member. In an interview with Reuters, Beth Hammack explained why she advocates for raising interest rates.

Hammack stated that inflation is likely to remain high and will not spontaneously fall to the 2 percent target level, which is why at the July meeting he voted in favor of raising interest rates.

Hammack noted that prolonged high inflation and delays in combating it may necessitate a more aggressive interest rate hike in the future, stating: "The longer high inflation persists, the more difficult and costly it becomes to reduce it."

Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank President Neel Kashkari was one of the members who supported raising the interest rate.

Like Hammack, Neel Kashkari also emphasized the importance of high inflation, pointing to the risk of it becoming entrenched in the long term.

In this context, Kashkari stated that he prefers to gradually tighten monetary policy to manage the risk of persistent inflation.

Instead of concluding that more aggressive measures are needed if inflation remains high, and waiting, Kashkari argued that it would now be more appropriate to take small steps, adding that such a strategy would allow the FOMC to slow down or pause the process without creating unnecessary impact on the real economy.

Kashkari argues that gradually raising interest rates will help reduce the risk of prolonged inflation.

Third, Dallas Federal Reserve Bank President Lorie Logan also supported raising the interest rate at the latest meeting. Logan also points to the risk of high inflation and argues that immediate action to raise interest rates is necessary.

The three mentioned officials also opposed tightening monetary policy at the April meeting.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Domande pertinenti

QWho were the three FOMC members that dissented and voted for a rate hike at the July meeting?

AThe three FOMC members were Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack, Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari, and Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan.

QWhat was the main reason Beth Hammack gave for voting to raise interest rates?

ABeth Hammack stated that inflation is likely to remain high and will not spontaneously fall to the 2% target, and a prolonged high inflation makes it harder and more expensive to reduce later.

QWhat strategy did Neel Kashkari advocate for dealing with inflation risks?

ANeel Kashkari advocated for gradually tightening monetary policy with small steps, arguing it would allow the FOMC to slow or pause the process without creating unnecessary impact on the real economy.

QAccording to the article, what is the common concern driving the three officials' hawkish stance?

AThe common concern is the risk of high inflation becoming entrenched or persistent in the long term.

QHad these three officials expressed a similar hawkish position at a previous FOMC meeting?

AYes, the article notes that all three officials had also dissented against keeping monetary policy unchanged at the April FOMC meeting.

Letture associate

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

Amidst a generally stagnant crypto market in June and July, UNI, the governance token of Uniswap, saw a significant surge, nearly doubling in price from around $2.3 to $4.6. This rally represents a delayed but significant value reassessment, triggered by the practical implementation of its long-debated "fee switch" mechanism. The key turning point was the on-chain execution of the UNIfication proposal in December 2025. It activated a protocol fee on select pools, directed Unichain sequencer revenue (net of costs) to a communal treasury, executed a one-time burn of 100 million UNI, and established a system where all protocol revenue flows into a "TokenJar" contract. This treasury has a single exit: purchasing and permanently burning UNI via a "Firepit" contract. Initially, the market reacted tepidly as the generated revenue and corresponding burn rate were modest. The narrative shifted dramatically in July 2025 with two major developments. First, the launch of Robinhood Chain, tailored for tokenized stocks, rapidly became a primary source of volume and fees for Uniswap, at one point contributing nearly half of its weekly fees. Second, governance votes successfully expanded the fee mechanism to v4 pools and initiated a temperature check for fees on Robinhood Chain. The activation of v4 fees caused the protocol's daily revenue earmarked for UNI burns to nearly triple. The core of UNI's recent price action is the transition from a pure governance token to a cash-flow asset with a permanent, protocol-funded buyer. Its effectiveness is amplified by UNI's mature and widely distributed supply, with no major impending unlocks to dilute the impact of the buybacks. The sustainability of this rally now hinges on whether the transaction volume, particularly on Robinhood Chain, persists after its initial gas subsidies expire, determining if this is a genuine value realization or a subsidy-fueled spike.

marsbit28 min fa

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

marsbit28 min fa

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbit2 h fa

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbit2 h fa

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbit2 h fa

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbit2 h fa

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731) provides a curated selection of deep analysis, filtering out market noise. Key themes from this week include: **Macro & Policy:** The Federal Reserve's upcoming meeting is marked by high uncertainty, balancing cooling inflation data against persistent price pressures. Meanwhile, the U.S. crypto regulatory Clarity Act faces critical political hurdles, with its 2026 passage probability seen as low. **Investing & Crypto:** Analysis suggests long-term crypto success depends on conviction through volatile cycles, focusing on assets like Bitcoin and core smart contract platforms. A trend noted is the increasing similarity between global equity markets (especially tech) and crypto, driven by narrative and leverage. Several major crypto protocols show strong revenue growth, but this isn't always translating to token price appreciation due to sell pressure and structural factors. **AI & Semiconductors:** Nvidia's rising credit default swap rates signal market concern over AI infrastructure financing risks. The storage sector experienced volatility as markets began pricing in potential 2027 oversupply. Despite a record profitable quarter, SK Hynix's results were deemed "below expectations," reflecting heightened investor demands for future growth visibility. **Markets & DeFi:** TradeXYZ demonstrated remarkable accuracy in pre-market pricing for a major A股 listing. The token ONDO saw gains, linked to its growing role in the on-chain tokenized stock ecosystem. **Ethereum:** Post-Pectra upgrade, a major structural shift is underway as Lido begins migrating millions of ETH to new validator architectures designed for capital efficiency. **Also Highlighted:** Butian's bullish stock market move; OpenAI's Altman promising major advances; Samsung and SK Hynix securing large AI chip deals; Apple reaching a $5T market cap; and ongoing discussions around exchange security following Poolin's bankruptcy case.

marsbit2 h fa

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片