Inside Neo Blockchain Fallout: Co-Founders Trade Barbs Over Money and Power

ccn.comPubblicato 2025-12-31Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-31

Introduzione

Neo blockchain co-founders Da Hongfei and Erik Zhang are engaged in a public dispute over financial transparency and governance. Zhang accuses Hongfei of withholding financial reports for years and demands full disclosure of the Neo Foundation's assets and expenditures. He also states that Hongfei will step back from Neo mainnet operations starting January 1, 2026, to focus on side projects. Hongfei counters that Zhang controls the majority of NEO and GAS tokens and has refused to transfer them to multi-signature wallets despite previous agreements. Both claim to act in Neo’s best interests, but the conflict has raised concerns about governance and trust within the community. The disagreement underscores ongoing tensions in the project's management since its rebrand from Antshares in 2017.

Key Takeaways

  • Neo co-founders Erik Zhang and Da Hongfei are publicly fighting over the project’s finances and control.
  • Zhang says Hongfei has kept the finances secret for years and must now share a full report.
  • The argument undermines trust in Neo, with both parties claiming to protect the project.

The Neo blockchain, often referred to as the “Chinese Ethereum” due to its smart contract capabilities and focus on digital assets, has been rocked by a public feud between its co-founders, Da Hongfei and Erik Zhang.

This dispute centers on financial transparency, control over the project’s treasury, and allegations of governance hijacking.

Earn Crypto with These Top Mining Apps
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"}' data-trk="67d19e1ff74d32de176c1b03" href="https://www.miningrigrentals.com?ref=2742248" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Mining Rig Rentals<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67d19e1ff74d32de176c1b03" href="https://www.miningrigrentals.com?ref=2742248" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Mining Rig Rentals

promotions
Earn a commission on your referral\u2019s transactions.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67d19e1ff74d32de176c1b03" href="https://www.miningrigrentals.com?ref=2742248" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Earn a commission on your referral’s transactions.
Coins
6
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="67d19ee2f74d32de176c1b5f" href="https://hashing24.com/?rid=53616c7465645f5fe8657fbf16217f483baff299e53f4db4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Hashing24<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67d19ee2f74d32de176c1b5f" href="https://hashing24.com/?rid=53616c7465645f5fe8657fbf16217f483baff299e53f4db4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Hashing24

promotions
Earn 3-10% on referral purchases<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67d19ee2f74d32de176c1b5f" href="https://hashing24.com/?rid=53616c7465645f5fe8657fbf16217f483baff299e53f4db4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Earn 3-10% on referral purchases
Coins
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="67d1a119f74d32de176c1be1" href="https://accounts.binance.com/en/register?ref=DTDJBNX1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Binance Pool<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67d1a119f74d32de176c1be1" href="https://accounts.binance.com/en/register?ref=DTDJBNX1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Binance Pool

promotions
Sign up, verify, deposit 100 USDT, get 100 USDT bonus<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67d1a119f74d32de176c1be1" href="https://accounts.binance.com/en/register?ref=DTDJBNX1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Sign up, verify, deposit 100 USDT, get 100 USDT bonus
Coins
5
Claim Offer

Chinese Ethereum Killer Controversy

As of Dec. 31, the co-founders had exchanged pointed allegations on X, with each believing the other was to blame for opacity and potential resource waste.

Neo co-founder Erik Zhang accused Da Hongfei of failing to disclose Neo Foundation finances and urged a complete, verifiable report.

He said Hongfei will step back from Neo mainnet work, effective Jan. 1, 2026, to focus on NeoX and SpoonOS.

Hongfei replied that Zhang controls most NEO funds and consensus power, stating that one person should not run the project. He had long pushed for moving NEO/GAS to NF multisig wallets, but Zhang had repeatedly delayed the transfer.

“Before today, I avoided raising this publicly to protect community confidence and to give space for an orderly resolution. That silence was born of the hope that he would honor his promise. That restraint has now been misinterpreted. I should have done this earlier.”

This has sparked concerns about Neo’s future stability, particularly considering its history of pivots from Antshares to Neo, as well as migrations such as N3.

The controversy between the two founders of the popular blockchain network highlights deeper issues in decentralized project management, where personal control over funds can undermine community trust.

Neo’s History

The latest spat between the two co-founders stems from a protracted historical conflict of oversight.

Zhang alleged that Hongfei approached him privately, before 2025, claiming that joint oversight was inefficient and suggesting that one of the founders step down.

The co-founder allegedly agreed to withdraw, believing it would benefit Neo.

Zhang realized that Hongfei was working on AEON, a new blockchain project with its own coin that might potentially utilize Neo’s resources.

This motivated Zhang to return and question what he regarded as a conflict of interest.

According to Zhang, a phone call agreement was reached, where Hongfei would disclose financial reports and shift focus to side projects, such as NeoX, a cross-chain bridge, and SpoonOS, an operating system layer for Neo.

Erik posts publicly on Dec. 31, accusing Da of failing to honor the agreement. He demands the immediate disclosure of NF assets and expenditures, stating that Da will no longer handle Neo mainnet matters as of Jan. 1, 2026.

Da responds, countering that Erik controls the “super majority” of NEO/GAS in personal custody, refusing to transfer to multisig wallets despite promises. Da pledges a full 2025 financial report in Q1 2026 and vows to pursue treasury transfer through “all available remedies.

Da Hongfei and Erik Zhang established Antshares in 2014, which was later rebranded to Neo in 2017 amid China’s blockchain boom. Da Hongfei, who is sometimes referred to as the public face, has prioritized company development, collaborations, and ecosystem expansion.

The current spat revolves around the NF’s treasury—estimated to include significant NEO/GAS holdings and allegations that one founder has monopolized access, leading to a “black box” of unaccounted expenditures.

Community sentiment reflects displeasure with both parties for undermining confidence. Users and analysts describe it as a “governance breakdown” and a “trainwreck,” seeking rapid disclosures to restore credibility.

Some note danger signals, such as blocked access to reports, which mimic bigger blockchain governance flaws encountered in projects like Mantra DAO.

Top Picks for Ethereum
  • Best Exchanges for Ethereum Get A Great Offer When You Join These Exchanges
  • Buy Ethereum Fast & Easy How To Buy Ethereum With a Credit Card Now
  • Best Online Casinos for Ethereum See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main issue causing the public feud between Neo's co-founders, Da Hongfei and Erik Zhang?

AThe main issue is a dispute over financial transparency and control of the Neo Foundation's treasury, with accusations of secret finances and governance hijacking.

QWhat specific action did Erik Zhang demand from Da Hongfei regarding the Neo Foundation's finances?

AErik Zhang demanded that Da Hongfei immediately share a full and verifiable financial report of the Neo Foundation's assets and expenditures.

QAccording to Da Hongfei's counter-argument, what control does Erik Zhang have over the project's assets?

ADa Hongfei stated that Erik Zhang controls a 'super majority' of NEO and GAS tokens in personal custody and has refused to transfer them to multi-signature wallets as promised.

QWhat change in Da Hongfei's role did Erik Zhang announce, effective January 1, 2026?

AErik Zhang announced that Da Hongfei would step back from working on the Neo mainnet to focus on side projects, namely NeoX and SpoonOS.

QHow has the community reacted to the public dispute between the two Neo co-founders?

AThe community has reacted with displeasure, describing the situation as a 'governance breakdown' and a 'trainwreck' that undermines trust, and is calling for rapid disclosures to restore credibility.

Letture associate

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbit42 min fa

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbit42 min fa

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbit46 min fa

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbit46 min fa

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报52 min fa

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报52 min fa

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbit57 min fa

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbit57 min fa

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

In late 2020, Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was effectively dismissed following a conflict over a 14-page, unpublished research paper she co-authored titled "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots." The paper, which has since been cited over 14,000 times, raised critical early warnings about the risks of large language models (LLMs). It argued that these models, trained on vast, biased internet data, are essentially "stochastic parrots" that mimic language without true understanding, potentially amplifying societal biases, generating plausible but false information (later termed "AI hallucination"), consuming massive energy, and obscuring their training data contents. Gebru's stance led to a clash with Google management, who requested the paper's withdrawal. Her subsequent internal criticism of the company's diversity efforts and handling of the matter culminated in her termination, which sparked protests from over 4,000 Google employees and researchers. Six years later, the paper's predictions have proven remarkably prescient. Issues like AI hallucination, embedded bias (evident in resume screening and healthcare algorithms), soaring energy consumption from AI data centers, unvetted training data containing harmful content, and the risk of "model collapse" from AI-generated internet content have become central industry challenges. The incident also highlighted concerns about AI development being driven primarily by commercial competition within a handful of powerful tech companies, often at the expense of ethical considerations. After leaving Google, Gebru founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) to explore these issues independently. The controversy underscores how her early, critical insights into the fundamental limitations and societal impacts of LLMs anticipated many of the most pressing dilemmas in today's AI era.

marsbit58 min fa

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

marsbit58 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare NEO

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di NEO (NEO) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente NEONEO.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva NEO (NEO)Dopo aver acquistato NEO (NEO), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia NEO (NEO)Scambia facilmente NEO (NEO) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

72 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.10Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare NEO

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di NEO NEO sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片