Inside Bitwise’s bet on the debasement trade with Bitcoin-gold ETF

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-24

Introduzione

Despite recent underperformance compared to gold, asset managers like Bitwise believe Bitcoin remains a crucial hedge against currency devaluation and fiscal debt. This has led to the launch of the Bitwise Proficio Currency Debasement ETF (BPRO), a combined Bitcoin-gold ETF designed to capitalize on the "debasement trade" narrative. The fund aims to protect investors from the erosion of purchasing power caused by expanding money supply and rising U.S. debt, which now nears $40 trillion. The ETF garnered significant interest, with $13.2 million in trading volume and $52.4 million in assets under management on its first day. Bitwise's internal data indicates strong institutional demand for such alternative hedges, ranking second only to stablecoins. However, the short-term correlation between Bitcoin and gold has recently been negative, with gold surging 78% over the past year while Bitcoin declined 14%. Despite attempts to revert to a positive correlation in 2026, this decoupling has persisted, exacerbated by recent geopolitical tensions and macroeconomic instability. Nonetheless, Bitwise and its competitors are moving forward, betting on the long-term viability of the debasement trade.

Despite underperforming gold for the past few months, asset managers still believe that Bitcoin is a hedge against currency devaluation and fiscal debt.

And this belief has led Bitwise to unveil a combined Bitcoin gold ETF – Bitwise Proficio Currency Debasement ETF (BPRO). This is meant to offer investors exposure to the so-called “debasement trade.”

The trade is a narrative that the demand for safe havens like gold, silver, and Bitcoin will increase as U.S fiscal debts and subsequent currency devaluation slash purchasing power and wealth.

Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan echoed the same, adding that this “hard asset approach” is the missing piece in the portfolio. Especially since traditional stocks and ETFs haven’t helped preserve wealth amid rapid money supply expansion. He added,

“By combining the historical scarcity of gold with the modern, digital scarcity of Bitcoin, BPRO offers a powerful new way to hedge against the persistent decline of fiat currency.”

Bitwise’s BTC-gold ETF hits $13M on day 1

The firm highlighted that U.S debt increased to close to $40 trillion, and the U.S dollar’s purchasing power dropped by 40% over the past two decades – Reinforcing currency ‘debasement’ as a real risk.

Bitwise’s move came a few days after rival asset manager 21Shares launched a similar product.

The BPRO product saw $13.2 million in trading volume and $52.4 million in assets under management (AUM) on day 1, underscoring interest in the “debasement trade.”

In fact, the asset manager’s latest survey showed that alternative hedges against fiat debasement ranked second among the areas institutional investors were most interested in, after stablecoins.

Put differently, the push for a combined BTC and gold ETF or “debasement trade” isn’t just media hype. There is data supporting it.

BTC-gold correlation falters

Here, it’s worth pointing out that the current short-term correlation between BTC and gold doesn’t align with the data.

Over the past year, gold has rallied by 78% while BTC dropped by 14%. Other perceived safe havens such as silver have also soared by 200% – Making BTC a key laggard.

It is unclear whether the negative correlation will continue in 2026. However, this decoupling occurred after the 10 October 2025, crash, pushing the correlation into negative territory in late 2025.

So far in 2026, an attempt to flip the correlation back to positive has failed. Especially after BTC slid lower while gold climbed higher amid this week’s geopolitical tensions and Japan’s bond crisis.


Final Thoughts

  • Bitwise and 21Shares are betting big on the debasement trade and have unveiled a combined BTC and gold ETF as an alternative hedge.
  • Gold-BTC correlation tried to flip to positive, but the recent macro landscape derailed the momentum.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main purpose of Bitwise's new ETF, BPRO?

AThe Bitwise Proficio Currency Debasement ETF (BPRO) is designed to offer investors exposure to the 'debasement trade,' serving as a hedge against currency devaluation and fiscal debt by combining Bitcoin and gold.

QAccording to the article, what real-world data supports the need for a 'debasement trade' hedge?

AThe article cites that U.S. debt has increased to nearly $40 trillion and the U.S. dollar's purchasing power has dropped by 40% over the past two decades, reinforcing currency debasement as a real risk.

QHow did the correlation between Bitcoin and gold perform in the recent past according to the article?

AThe correlation between Bitcoin and gold turned negative in late 2025 after the crash on October 10, 2025. In the past year, gold rallied 78% while Bitcoin dropped 14%, and attempts to flip the correlation back to positive in 2026 have failed.

QWhat was the initial market response to the launch of the BPRO ETF?

AOn its first day, the BPRO ETF saw $13.2 million in trading volume and gathered $52.4 million in assets under management (AUM), indicating significant investor interest.

QAmong institutional investors, how did interest in 'alternative hedges against fiat debasement' rank in Bitwise's survey?

AAccording to Bitwise's latest survey, alternative hedges against fiat debasement ranked as the second area institutional investors were most interested in, right after stablecoins.

Letture associate

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit31 min fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit31 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit50 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit50 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit59 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit59 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片