Industry Experts Gather, Reflections and Breakthroughs in the AI Agent Era

marsbitPubblicato 2026-04-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-08

Introduzione

Industry experts gathered to discuss the challenges and opportunities in the AI Agent era. The event, co-hosted by several organizations, addressed key questions about model selection, token resource sustainability, and strategies for individuals and businesses to adapt. Conflux's Chief Architect highlighted the current trend of granting AI more autonomy, noting that its limitations in complex scenarios stem from difficulties in capturing and retaining key contextual constraints. Future advancements should focus on enhancing external memory, continuous learning, and domain-specific applications. Speakers from Tencent Cloud and Biteye shared practical insights. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages multi-agent collaboration for tasks like resume screening and report generation, emphasizing enterprise-grade security. Biteye’s founder discussed mitigating AI hallucinations through rigorous code review processes, managing token consumption, and using platforms like Discord for agent coordination. Legal risks were also addressed, with a partner from Mankun Law advising on liability isolation, intellectual property protection, and mitigating platform dependency risks. Investors noted that AI is still in its early stages, with technology rapidly evolving. They emphasized investing in foundational layers like compute power and exploring AI-Web3 convergence. The discussion concluded that AI should be viewed as a productivity tool rather than a threat. Customizable agents can significantly...

Today, the Agent economy is no longer a sci-fi concept; it brings not only a leap in efficiency but also a restructuring and redistribution of economic organization. Particularly, the global popularity of the open-source project OpenClaw has further propelled large models from the lab to large-scale applications, with various parties scrambling to join the battle for Agent entry points.

So, which large model should one choose? Will Token resources be sufficient to support long-term use? Will those who don't follow the OpenClaw (Lobster) trend be left behind by the times? In this rapidly evolving AI transformation, how should individuals position themselves and find breakthroughs?

With these questions in mind, on April 3, Xujiahui Tech Innovation, Shanghai Distributed Consensus Technology Association, PANews, and Mankun Law Firm jointly hosted a themed event called "Don't 'Shrimp' Anxiety."

In a keynote speech titled "Embracing the Unpredictable AI Wave," Li Chenxing, Chief Architect of Conflux Tree Graph, stated that currently, giving more autonomy to AI rather than overly constraining it with limited human experience is an inevitable trend at this stage of technology. The "lack of consideration" exhibited by AI is essentially due to its difficulty in stably capturing and consistently remembering key contextual constraints in complex scenarios. From a technical structure perspective, AI primarily relies on parametric memory, contextual memory, and external memory, but these mechanisms still face challenges such as difficulty in updates, limited context windows, and insufficient call efficiency. Therefore, the future should focus on strengthening external memory call capabilities, exploring continuous learning and experience reuse mechanisms, and gradually accumulating experiential memory through vertical domain practices to enhance AI's decision-making completeness and reliability in real-world complex scenarios.

He also pointed out that the core progress of AI currently lies in the enhancement of autonomous analysis and reflection capabilities. With future improvements in memory capabilities, key bottlenecks are expected to be broken, profoundly impacting various industries. For example, the long-term potential of digital identity and digital payment systems has been constrained by development and user barriers, but AI has the potential to unlock this value by reducing development costs and acting as an agent to replace the user learning process. Overall, AI should not be seen as a threat to employment but as a key tool for boosting productivity and creating new opportunities. Individuals and industries should maintain an open mindset and actively explore paths for AI integration.

According to Feng Heqing, Product Architect of Tencent Cloud Workbuddy, with the significant improvement in large model capabilities, AI has evolved from early-stage basic辅助开发 like code completion to independently completing complex tasks. The core capabilities of custom Agents are reflected in end-to-end task support, multi-role collaboration, hierarchical memory systems, and intelligent task decomposition based on context. Additionally, multi-Agent collaboration enables data flow and parallel processing between tasks, while security measures include local data storage and manual confirmation for critical operations to ensure data security. In terms of applications, WorkBuddy already covers typical office scenarios such as resume screening, automated PPT generation, data analysis, and weekly report integration. It can also integrate with enterprise systems like Qiwei through enterprise-level integration capabilities to achieve unified task management. Its technical architecture emphasizes full-stack self-development, execution environment isolation, and enterprise-grade permission control, supporting both local and cloud deployments. In terms of business models, it can target enterprise R&D and high-frequency digital office users. Overall, WorkBuddy aims to enhance enterprise production efficiency through custom Agents and multi-task collaboration capabilities, and further strengthen its adaptability and implementation capabilities in complex enterprise scenarios by continuously optimizing task decomposition and ecosystem expansion.

Teddy, founder of Biteye and XHunt, shared insights on digital employee practices, large model applications and cost issues, technical configuration and security risks, and collaboration optimization. Regarding digital employee practices, to reduce model hallucinations and code error rates, it is necessary to introduce higher-level review Agents to conduct secondary checks on code generated by lower-level Agents, forming a mandatory code review process. Since current Agents still produce bugs in code writing, errors can be reduced by standardizing development processes, strengthening prompt design, and adding multi-round verification mechanisms. In operational scenarios, it is crucial to control posting frequency and ensure stability through backend API scheduling. In complex team collaboration environments, Discord is generally more suitable than Telegram for Agent coordination and task distribution, and special attention must be paid to Token consumption in resource management. Additionally, Agent systems still require human time for training, tuning, and behavior correction.

Regarding the installation and deployment of OpenClaw, Teddy suggested running it on idle computers or Mac Minis, which offers high autonomy and control. The code is fully open-source, emphasizing privacy protection capabilities and access to an international ecosystem, though the installation and configuration barriers are relatively high. During use, special attention must be paid to the risks of modifying model and channel configurations to avoid system abnormalities due to improper settings; tools like Grok and Gemini can assist in troubleshooting issues. On the security front, risks such as prompt injection attacks and malicious skill injection must be guarded against. Resource and cost aspects also require attention to Token consumption control to avoid high operational costs.

In a keynote speech, Zhao Xuan, Partner Lawyer at Mankun Law Firm, shared three major legal issues and solutions that entrepreneurs in the AI era need to focus on. The first is the organizational shell, specifically the "false isolation" created by One-Person Companies (OPCs), which表面上 form independent entities but实际上 struggle to truly isolate liability and risk. True physical and legal isolation is needed, including introducing partners in the structure, using dedicated corporate credit cards, and inserting AI disclaimers and liability caps into contracts. The second is the issue of core asset ownership: effort does not equal rights; one must prove their dominion and fully document the creation process with evidence preservation. The third is the systemic risk of "pulling the plug" due to platform hegemony, including god-like terms of service and technological lock-in. Core data should be separated from third-party services, alternative plans should be made in advance, and decentralized technologies should be introduced.

In a panel titled "From Frenzy to Sobriety: Real Needs and False Propositions of AI in the Eyes of VCs," several investors shared their views on the development stage, application boundaries, and investment logic of AI.

Cancer, Founding Partner of Shuidi Capital, believes that AI is still in its early stages and will take considerable time to truly reach a stage of mature user experience and be widely regarded as "meaningful." He pointed out that AI technology迭代极快 (iterates extremely fast), and relying solely on technological leadership is难以形成长期护城河 (difficult to form a long-term moat). Therefore, investment should focus more on foundational layer capabilities with irreplaceability, such as core resources like computing power. At the application level, he gave an example that tools like "Lobster" are not user-friendly for average programming users but might be more suitable in the future as encapsulated vertical applications like "family doctors," providing professional advice through real-time health data. He also believes that AI can replace information production tools like research reports on the enterprise side but cannot replace final decision-making roles, serving only as辅助决策工具 (decision-support tools).

Tang Yi, Founding Partner of Enlight Capital, stated that it is currently difficult to find明显的非共识机会 (obvious non-consensus opportunities) in the AI investment field, as the rapid iteration of large models may continuously "flatten" the advantages of application-layer companies. He is relatively optimistic about the combination of Web3 and AI, seeing them as representing advanced productivity in their respective fields. Regarding open-source tools like OpenClaw, he believes they essentially give large models "hands" and "feet," enhancing their ability to connect with external systems and social applications, but also bringing higher security and data risks, thus requiring complex configurations unsuitable for ordinary users. Currently, a more ideal path is to improve overall ease of use and experience.

Yinghao, Investor at First Rule Ventures, focuses on application opportunities from the perspective of users and products, including deep-water industry applications, AI creation, and software-hardware integration, evaluating project potential through user behavior and interaction data. He pointed out that not trying every emerging AI product personally does not mean missing key trends, as technological capabilities are often quickly modularized and integrated into existing product systems.

Compared to single products, he is more concerned with three long-term structural changes: First, whether AI interaction is forming a new memory carrier, allowing users' cognition and work to be沉淀 (precipitated) within a certain system. Second, whether this memory has the ability to migrate across products or will gradually become bound to a single product, creating high migration costs and experience lock-in. Third, whether new super entry points will emerge, becoming core hubs for AI interaction and traffic distribution.

Zhao Xuan, Partner Lawyer at Mankun Law Firm, primarily uses AI tools for data processing, retrieval, and analysis in his work and looks forward to the emergence of more integrated products that consolidate these capabilities. He also emphasized that in AI entrepreneurship, it is more important to avoid一次性重大失败 (one-time major failures). He advised companies to prioritize key legal designs such as data compliance, arbitration clauses, and disclaimer clauses early on to achieve risk isolation and liability protection when uncontrollable risks arise, thereby preventing single-point risks from causing overall company collapse. Additionally, he展望道 (looked ahead), stating that in the future, Agents will become the main economic execution entities, responsible for data acquisition, information purchasing, strategy execution, and even cross-system transactions, forming a machine-to-machine economic activity and payment system.

In a panel discussion titled "N Ways to Open AI: Talking About Innovators' Opportunities," several guests explored the changes brought by AI from different perspectives. Zeno, CEO of Matrix Intelligence, suggested that users can modify scripts or plugins themselves to integrate multiple devices, achieving multi-device memory synchronization and state consistency, ensuring information isn't lost and tasks aren't interrupted. A daily purification/review mechanism can also be added to maintain system stability. Compared to using off-the-shelf tools,深度定制 (deep customization) based on enterprise-level permissions or platform capabilities is more efficient, freer, and更容易做出符合个人习惯的工作流 (easier to create workflows that suit personal habits). Looking ahead, he believes AI will become a unified entry point; users will only need to interact through one AI hub to调用 (call upon) various tools and systems to complete all tasks. As usage increases, AI will continuously accumulate user memory, preferences, and workflows, forming a data and capability flywheel effect, becoming increasingly understanding of the user and more efficient. Under this trend, individuals configuring AI systems and paying subscription costs may achieve productivity improvements far exceeding traditional human labor, significantly widening the efficiency gap between people.

0xOlivia, Co-founder of ClawFirm.dev, disclosed that in practical AI use, issues like system instability and fragmented memory and automation capabilities still exist. Users need to constantly piece together various tools and scripts like building with LEGOs. For non-advanced users, adopting成熟的商业平台 (mature commercial platforms) combined with official applications and continuous iteration capabilities is often more stable and efficient than highly fragmented self-built systems. Introducing open-source components can further enhance data processing and content generation capabilities. She emphasized that the current main limitation of AI is not the model capability itself but the fact that engineering usage methods have not yet fully matched model capabilities, leaving huge room for optimization and implementation. In the future, as large model capabilities rapidly增强 (strengthen), AI application scenarios will gradually cover all aspects of work and life and continue to integrate with different product forms.

Teddy, founder of Biteye/XHunt, pointed out in discussing AI digital employees that APIs or automation interfaces can be used to integrate AI into internal systems, enabling it to undertake specific execution tasks like code generation, requirement implementation, and content processing, while humans focus on product design and需求定义 (requirement definition), thus retaining key decision-making power. This collaboration model is more stable and scalable, not only improving overall development efficiency but also significantly reducing error rates, making AI more like a schedulable, manageable outsourced team rather than a single tool. He also emphasized that any process-driven, highly repetitive work has the potential to be transformed or replaced by AI. Even if the initial effects are unstable, long-term optimization will continuously enhance productivity. In complex task and management decision-making areas, AI has also begun to show significant辅助能力 (assistive capabilities) and is渗透 (penetrating) into higher-order business scenarios.

Senior AI Application Development Engineer Brother Dou added that there is general consensus on the trend of AI outsourcing, automation, and tool-based collaboration. From an enterprise perspective, greater consideration needs to be given to security, permission management, employee collaboration mechanisms, and asset沉淀 (precipitation). Currently, the market has various AI development frameworks and tool ecosystems, each with its own focus on lightweight, low-code, high-integration, and security control aspects. Enterprises need to balance flexibility and controllability when choosing and design their architecture based on actual business scenarios. Truly understanding and implementing these AI systems cannot remain at the theoretical level; it requires actual investment and usage costs. He emphasized that AI is rapidly reshaping workflows and organizational structures. Whether individuals or enterprises, they must quickly adapt to this change,提升效率 (enhance efficiency) through continuous learning and tool application, otherwise they risk being left behind by the pace of technological iteration.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the core challenges and limitations of current AI systems as discussed by Li Chenxing, Chief Architect of Conflux?

ALi Chenxing highlighted that AI's current 'lack of consideration' stems from difficulties in stably capturing and persistently memorizing key constraints in complex scenarios. The main limitations include: parameter memory, context memory, and external memory mechanisms, which suffer from issues like difficult updates, limited context windows, and inefficient calls. Future improvements should focus on enhancing external memory calls, exploring continuous learning and experience reuse mechanisms, and accumulating experiential memory through vertical domain practices.

QHow does Tencent Cloud's WorkBuddy enhance enterprise productivity through its AI Agent system?

AWorkBuddy enhances enterprise productivity by offering custom Agents with capabilities such as end-to-end task support, multi-role collaboration, hierarchical memory systems, and context-based task decomposition. It enables multi-Agent collaboration for data transfer and parallel processing, ensures data security through local storage and manual confirmation for critical operations, and integrates with platforms like WeCom for unified task management. It covers scenarios like resume screening, PPT generation, data analysis, and weekly report consolidation.

QWhat legal risks and solutions for AI entrepreneurs were emphasized by Zhao Xuan, Partner at Mankun Law Firm?

AZhao Xuan highlighted three key legal issues: 1) The false isolation of one-person companies (OPC), which requires introducing partners, using dedicated corporate cards, and including AI disclaimers and liability caps in contracts. 2) Core asset ownership, which necessitates documenting the creation process and preserving evidence. 3) Systemic risks from platform dominance, such as 'God clauses' and technical lock-ins, which can be mitigated by separating core data from third-party services, planning alternatives, and adopting decentralized technologies.

QWhat investment perspectives were shared by venture capitalists regarding AI's current stage and future potential?

AVCs noted that AI is still in its early stages, with rapid iteration making technical advantages short-lived. Investments should focus on foundational layers like computing power. They expressed caution about application-layer companies due to the leveling effect of large model advancements. Some看好 Web3 and AI integration, while others emphasized vertical applications like 'family doctors' for health advice. They also highlighted the importance of user behavior data and long-term structural changes, such as AI forming new memory carriers and super entry points.

QHow do experts suggest optimizing AI Agent collaboration and reducing errors in practical deployments?

AExperts recommend introducing higher-level review Agents to audit code generated by lower-level Agents, standardizing development processes, refining prompt design, and adding multi-round verification mechanisms. In team environments, Discord is preferred over Telegram for Agent coordination. Token consumption must be managed to control costs, and human oversight is essential for training, tuning, and behavior correction. For stability, backend scheduling and controlling posting frequencies are advised, along with security measures against prompt attacks and malicious skill injections.

Letture associate

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit6 min fa

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit6 min fa

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手29 min fa

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手29 min fa

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit1 h fa

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit1 h fa

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit2 h fa

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ERA

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Caldera (ERA) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente CalderaERA.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Caldera (ERA)Dopo aver acquistato Caldera (ERA), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Caldera (ERA)Scambia facilmente Caldera (ERA) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

347 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.07.17Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare ERA

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ERA ERA sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片