India’s Crypto Policy Under Scrutiny as Chadha Pushes for VDA Legal Recognition

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-10

Introduzione

Indian AAP MP Raghav Chadha urged the Indian government to legally recognize Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs) as a formal asset class during a Rajya Sabha address. He highlighted the inconsistency in the current approach where crypto profits are taxed—1% TDS and 30% flat tax—yet lack legal status. This ambiguity has eroded investor confidence, driven an estimated 12 crore Indian investors to offshore platforms, and caused 180 VDA startups to relocate abroad. Chadha noted that 73% of crypto trading volume has moved offshore in FY25, resulting in significant tax revenue loss. He proposed a new licensing law to enhance consumer protection, enforce AML measures, and potentially recover ₹15,000–20,000 crores in annual tax revenue through clear regulation.

AAP MP Raghav Chadha addressed the Rajya Sabha, urging the Indian government to legalise Virtual Digital Assets as a formal asset class. He noted that the government has already started taxing digital assets but has failed to accord them the requisite legal classification. Chadha noted that the tax structure requires investors to pay 1% as TDS and a 30% flat tax on their crypto profits without legal status. Chadha noted that the government needs to move beyond the half-baked system of asset classification.

The MP argued that such an inconsistency erodes investor confidence in digital assets. Chadha said 12 crore Indian investors are forced to use offshore platforms due to unclear laws. He added that 180 VDA startups have relocated operations to crypto-friendly jurisdictions abroad. The MP emphasised that India loses significant tax revenues under the current regulatory trend.

Offshore Trading and Regulatory Challenges

Chadha pointed out that 73% of the trading volume of crypto assets had left the country and gone offshore in the Financial Year 2025. This trend will continue and likely worsen unless authorities implement clear regulations. According to the MP, the current regulatory space is risky and does not encourage investors. The MP noted that other countries, such as Dubai, Singapore, and Malaysia, have attracted Indian investors due to clear regulatory mechanisms. These countries have clear legal frameworks that classify the services of crypto assets.

Chadha pointed out that the lack of a licensing law for India holds the key to comprehensive consumer protection and AML. He said that the ring-fencing approach could lower the risks of money laundering and enhance compliance. Chadha added that the digital trading assets, if brought onboard, could strengthen the domestic market.

Proposed Legislative Framework

Mr Chadha also proposed drafting a new law to enable licensing for digital asset exchanges and related service providers. The law should place investor protection at the center of its mandates and enforce stringent AML measures to bring the grey market into compliance. It will also help India to garner tax revenues of Rs.15,000 to Rs.20,000 crores annually as clarity is created.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Vitalik Buterin Outlines Ethereum’s AI Framework, Pushes Back Against Solana’s Acceleration Thesis

Tags#Indiacrypto tax indiaIndiaIndia CryptocurrencyIndian_Government

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main argument made by AAP MP Raghav Chadha regarding India's crypto policy?

ARaghav Chadha argues that India should legalize Virtual Digital Assets as a formal asset class, as the current system taxes crypto (1% TDS and 30% flat tax on profits) without providing legal status, which he calls a 'half-baked system'.

QAccording to the article, what are two major consequences of India's unclear crypto regulations?

ATwo major consequences are: 1) 12 crore Indian investors are forced to use offshore platforms, and 2) 180 VDA startups have relocated their operations to crypto-friendly jurisdictions abroad.

QWhat percentage of crypto trading volume has left India for offshore platforms in FY25, as cited by Chadha?

A73% of the trading volume of crypto assets had left the country and gone offshore in the Financial Year 2025.

QWhat key legislative measure did Chadha propose to address the regulatory challenges?

AChadha proposed drafting a new law to enable licensing for digital asset exchanges and related service providers, which would place investor protection at its center and enforce stringent Anti-Money Laundering (AML) measures.

QWhich countries were mentioned as having attracted Indian crypto investors due to their clear regulatory frameworks?

ADubai, Singapore, and Malaysia were mentioned as countries that have attracted Indian investors due to their clear regulatory mechanisms and legal frameworks for crypto assets.

Letture associate

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

North Korean hackers, particularly the notorious Lazarus Group and its subgroup TraderTraitor, have stolen over $500 million from cryptocurrency DeFi platforms in less than three weeks, bringing their total theft for the year to over $700 million. Recent major attacks on Drift Protocol and KelpDAO, resulting in losses of approximately $286 million and $290 million respectively, highlight a strategic shift: instead of targeting core smart contracts, attackers are now exploiting vulnerabilities in peripheral infrastructure. For instance, the KelpDAO attack involved compromising downstream RPC infrastructure used by LayerZero's decentralized validation network (DVN), allowing manipulation without breaching core cryptography. This sophisticated approach mirrors advanced corporate cyber-espionage. Additionally, North Korea has systematically infiltrated the global crypto workforce, with an estimated 100 operatives using fake identities to gain employment at blockchain companies, enabling long-term access to sensitive systems and facilitating large-scale thefts. According to Chainalysis, North Korean-linked hackers stole a record $2 billion in 2025, accounting for 60% of all global crypto theft that year. Their total historical crypto theft has reached $6.75 billion. Post-theft, they employ specialized money laundering methods, heavily relying on Chinese OTC brokers and cross-chain mixing services rather than standard decentralized exchanges. Security experts, while acknowledging the increased sophistication, emphasize that many attacks still exploit fundamental weaknesses like poor access controls and centralized operational risks. Strengthening private key management, limiting privileged access, and enhancing coordination among exchanges, analysts, and law enforcement immediately after an attack are critical to improving defense and fund recovery chances. The industry's challenge now extends beyond secure smart contracts to safeguarding operational security at the infrastructure level.

marsbit57 min fa

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

marsbit57 min fa

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire's recent activities in Seoul indicate a strategic shift for the company, moving away from issuing a Korean won-backed stablecoin and instead focusing on embedding itself as a key infrastructure provider within Korea’s financial and crypto ecosystem. Despite Korea accounting for nearly 30% of global crypto trading volume—with a market characterized by high retail participation and altcoin dominance—Circle has chosen not to compete for the role of stablecoin issuer. Instead, Allaire met with major Korean banks (including Shinhan, KB, and Woori), financial groups, leading exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone), and tech firms like Kakao. This approach reflects a broader industry transition: the core of stablecoin competition is shifting from issuance rights to systemic positioning. With Korean regulators still debating whether banks or tech companies should issue stablecoins, Circle is avoiding regulatory uncertainty by strengthening its role as a service and technology partner. The company is deepening integration with trading platforms, building connections, and promoting stablecoin infrastructure. This positions Circle to benefit regardless of which entity eventually issues a won stablecoin. Allaire also noted the potential for a Chinese yuan stablecoin in the next 3–5 years, underscoring a regional trend of stablecoins becoming more regulated and integrated with traditional finance. Ultimately, Circle’s strategy highlights that future influence in the stablecoin market will belong not necessarily to the issuers, but to the foundational infrastructure layers that enable cross-system transactions.

marsbit1 h fa

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

marsbit1 h fa

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

SpaceX has secured an option to acquire AI programming company Cursor for $60 billion, with an alternative clause requiring a $10 billion collaboration fee if the acquisition does not proceed. This structure is not merely a potential acquisition but a strategic move to control core access points in the AI era. The deal is designed as a flexible, dual-path arrangement, allowing SpaceX to either fully acquire Cursor or maintain a binding partnership through high-cost collaboration. This "option-style" approach minimizes immediate regulatory and integration risks while ensuring long-term alignment between the two companies. At its core, the transaction exchanges critical AI-era resources: SpaceX provides its Colossus supercomputing cluster—one of the world’s most powerful AI training infrastructures—while Cursor contributes its AI-native developer environment and strong product adoption. This synergy connects compute power, models, and application layers, forming a closed-loop AI capability stack. Cursor, founded in 2022, has achieved rapid growth with over $1 billion in annual revenue and widespread enterprise adoption. Its value lies in transforming software development through AI agents capable of coding, debugging, and system design—positioning it as a gateway to future software production. For SpaceX, this move is part of a broader strategy to evolve from a aerospace company into an AI infrastructure empire, integrating xAI, supercomputing, and chip manufacturing. Controlling Cursor fills a gap in its developer tooling layer, strengthening its AI narrative ahead of a potential IPO. The deal reflects a shift in AI competition from model superiority to ecosystem and entry-point control. With programming tools as a key battleground, securing developer loyalty becomes crucial for dominating the software production landscape. Risks include questions around Cursor’s valuation, technical integration challenges, and potential regulatory scrutiny. Nevertheless, the deal underscores a strategic bet: controlling both compute and software development access may redefine power dynamics in the AI-driven future.

marsbit2 h fa

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片