In the Internet Shutdown Winter, Iranians Rely on Decentralized Technology to Connect with the World

marsbitPubblicato 2026-02-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-02

Introduzione

Since early January, Iran has experienced severe nationwide internet blackouts amid violent protests triggered by the collapse of the national currency, the rial. Citizens like Darius, using pseudonyms for safety, have turned to decentralized tools such as dVPNs, OpenVPN, Shadowsocks, and V2Ray to bypass government censorship during brief connectivity windows. These tools disguise internet traffic to evade detection, allowing limited communication via platforms like Telegram. The Iranian government imposed the blackout to suppress protests and control information flow, following economic turmoil and public unrest. Experts note that decentralized networks and satellite systems like Starlink provide critical, resilient access, though complete shutdowns remain challenging to circumvent. The blackout has inflicted significant economic damage and hindered accurate reporting of casualties, with estimates of protest-related fatalities ranging from several thousand to tens of thousands. Despite these efforts, sustained resistance faces major obstacles without external support, as Iran’s heavily funded security apparatus maintains tight control. Decentralized technology remains a vital, though imperfect, lifeline for Iranians seeking to share information and connect with the outside world.

Written by: Liam Kelly

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

Since early January, Iran has been experiencing a large-scale internet shutdown, but some resourceful individuals have begun using decentralized technology to connect with the outside world.

During a brief window of internet connectivity amid the severe internet blockade in Iran this month, Darius managed to send a short message via Telegram.

"They are afraid of the videos protesters upload online, so they turned off all the street lights," he shared on January 14 with the Persian-language community Sentinel, of which he is a long-term member.

"People have to walk using their phone flashlights; everything is terrible. They have even broken North Korea's record in censorship."

This was about a week after the collapse of the Iranian rial (Iran's currency) sparked violent protests.

Since then, Darius has been switching between various network routing tools, including Sentinel's decentralized virtual private network (dVPN), to continue bypassing the government's strict communication blockade.

The tools he relies on include:

OpenVPN: A widely used tool that hides users' IP addresses;

Shadowsocks: Based on the SOCKS5 protocol, it disguises network traffic as random data;

V2Ray: Uses the security certificates of legitimate websites to conceal users' real identities.

In information exclusively provided to DL News, he described life under a violent regime with near-total internet disconnection.

"We are living in hell, with no internet, no money, no media, no support whatsoever," wrote Darius on January 14, using a pseudonym to protect his identity. "We need help; people cannot resist with bare hands—they shoot us with shotguns and AK-47s."

Digital Iron Curtain

In response to the ongoing protests that began last December and have spread to multiple areas beyond the capital Tehran, the Iranian government implemented the most severe communication shutdown in the regime's nearly 50-year history on January 8.

Adam Burns, co-founder of the Australian Internet Association, stated that the Iranian government's move has a dual purpose.

"This is a standard communication control measure, aimed at organizationally stifling protest activities and preventing international exposure," he told DL News. "Essentially, it's a form of risk management."

During this period, decentralized networks and traffic obfuscation tools became critical lifelines for the people.

Reports indicate that since last August, up to 90% of Iranians have used some form of circumvention tool to connect to the outside world.

Such networks are typically more resilient than centralized networks, which have a single database or point of failure. To destroy a decentralized network, the government must shut down every self-hosted node one by one or implement a complete nationwide internet blackout.

Other tools, such as Starlink, the distributed satellite network operated by Elon Musk's SpaceX, have also become vital communication channels for the people. Since systems like Starlink lack a single local node, their distributed infrastructure can provide critical network connectivity even under intense censorship.

However, reports note that such large-scale internet restrictions cost the country billions of dollars in economic losses.

"By providing decentralized, highly resilient network access to resist even the most aggressive censorship, we help keep information flowing, allowing the brave people inside Iran to document and share the violence concealed by the internet shutdown," Sentinel CEO Aleksandr Litreev told DL News.

Of course, in a complete internet blackout, almost no network can function.

However, during the shutdown, people like Darius can seize brief windows of connectivity, as the regime needs to balance silencing criticism with maintaining economic operations.

"It's a cyclical cat-and-mouse game," Burns said.

Using his combination of tools, Darius disguises his network requests as ordinary traffic, directing them to large Iranian e-commerce websites that the government keeps online for economic purposes. This encrypted data is then tunneled to overseas servers that can access the external internet.

This is not foolproof, nor is it sustainable, but it allows Darius to send a few Telegram messages during brief connectivity windows.

"Once the traffic pattern is exposed as an unauthenticated connection, it is immediately cut off," Darius wrote on January 23.

Chaos in Iran

Over the past four weeks, Iran has descended into total chaos.

On December 28, people gathered in Tehran's Grand Bazaar to protest the government's handling of the currency collapse. By the end of 2025, the Iranian rial had hit a historic low, with 1 US dollar exchanging for 1.4 million rials, partly due to severe international sanctions and financial mismanagement by Iran's leadership. The US imposed sanctions on Iran to prevent its nuclear weapons program and stop its support for terrorist groups like Hezbollah and the Houthis.

"It's like holding a shitcoin listed only on isolated exchanges, its price falling every day, until you have to use this worthless currency to buy basic necessities like milk and meat," Darius wrote. "Worse, the next day, the same items cost even more."

Iran is a theocracy, with the vast majority of power held by the Supreme Leader, cleric Ali Khamenei. Although Iran has an elected president and parliament, their power is limited. The people have long criticized the regime, and the rial's collapse has completely changed the situation.

"Generally, people don't revolt for lofty ideals like democracy or universal suffrage; they rebel over things that affect their daily lives," Tallha Abdulrazaq, a researcher at the University of Exeter's Institute for Strategy and Security, told DL News. "As long as basic needs are met and there is hope for the future, people are more willing to live under authoritarian rule."

After the internet shutdown on January 8, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the Basij militia began clearing protestors with live ammunition.

Due to the internet blackout, it has been difficult for people on the ground and multiple human rights organizations to verify the death toll. The Iran Human Rights Organization reported at least 3,428 deaths; London-based Persian-language news channel Iran International, citing internal documents from the Supreme National Security Council and the Presidential Office, reported at least 12,000 deaths. Two senior officials from Iran's Health Ministry told Time magazine that as many as 30,000 may have been killed between January 8 and 9.

As for overthrowing the regime, Abdulrazaq believes it is almost impossible without international intervention. "The Iranian government may not have invested in public services, but it has invested heavily in security agencies. Therefore, without external support, I don't see how these protests can overthrow the Iranian regime," he said.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat decentralized technologies are Iranians using to connect to the outside world during the internet blackout?

AIranians are using decentralized technologies such as Sentinel's dVPN, OpenVPN to hide IP addresses, Shadowsocks to disguise network traffic as random data, and V2Ray to mask user identities using legitimate website security certificates.

QWhy did the Iranian government impose such a severe internet blackout in January?

AThe Iranian government imposed the internet blackout to prevent the organization of protests and to stop international exposure of the violent crackdowns on demonstrators, following protests triggered by the collapse of the Iranian rial and economic mismanagement.

QHow do decentralized networks provide resilience against government censorship compared to centralized networks?

ADecentralized networks are more resilient because they lack a single point of failure or central database. To shut them down, the government would need to disable each self-hosted node individually or implement a complete nationwide internet blackout.

QWhat economic and social conditions led to the protests in Iran?

AThe protests were sparked by the collapse of the Iranian rial, which hit a record low of 1.4 million rials to the US dollar due to international sanctions and financial mismanagement. This led to severe inflation, making basic goods unaffordable and exacerbating public dissatisfaction with the regime.

QWhat are the reported casualty figures during the internet blackout and crackdown, and why is there difficulty in verifying them?

AReports vary widely: the Iran Human Rights Organization reported at least 3,428 deaths, Iran International cited internal documents suggesting at least 12,000 deaths, and Iranian Health Ministry officials told Time that up to 30,000 may have been killed. Verification is difficult due to the internet blackout, which prevents information from being shared and documented effectively.

Letture associate

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, is facing significant technical challenges as its growth outpaces its current infrastructure on Polygon. Users are experiencing laggy transactions, unresponsive orders, and delayed confirmations, severely impacting the trading experience. In response, DeFi Engineering VP Josh Stevens outlined a comprehensive engineering overhaul. The plan includes reducing on-chain data delays, fixing order cancellation issues, rebuilding the central limit order book (CLOB), improving website performance, and developing a unified SDK and API. A major revelation was the ongoing "chain migration," indicating a potential move away from Polygon. The core issue is that Polymarket has evolved from a simple prediction market into a high-frequency trading platform, making Polygon's limitations—such as block space, gas fees, and block time—a ceiling for further growth. The migration is not just a simple chain switch but a fundamental rebuild of its trading system to support more complex products like perpetual contracts (Perps). This announcement has sparked competition among chains like Solana, Sui, and Algorand, all vying to host Polymarket. For Polygon, losing this key application, which contributes significantly to its gas fee revenue, would be a major setback. The real test for Polymarket is no longer attracting users but proving it can provide a stable, reliable trading environment that retains them.

Odaily星球日报9 min fa

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Odaily星球日报9 min fa

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit47 min fa

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit47 min fa

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit1 h fa

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片