IMF Flags Financial Stability Risks Amid Growing Tokenization Boom

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-04-03Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-03

Introduzione

The IMF acknowledges that tokenization can increase transparency and reduce friction in finance but also warns it poses significant risks to financial stability. While atomic settlement and automation may reduce some traditional risks, they introduce new ones, making the overall impact uncertain. The tokenized asset market, currently valued at over $27.6 billion (excluding stablecoins), is projected to reach between $2 trillion and $16 trillion by 2030. The IMF report highlights both positive effects, such as faster cross-border payments and greater financial inclusion, and negative consequences, including increased capital flow volatility and threats to monetary sovereignty. It cautions that risks are shifting from banks to shared ledgers and smart contracts. Major institutions like BlackRock and the Intercontinental Exchange are advancing in tokenization, but the IMF warns that without legal clarity on ownership and settlement, these markets risk becoming fragmented and insignificant.

While the IMF acknowledged that tokenization might increase transparency and decrease friction in the financial sector, it also cautioned that the technology could pose risks to the sector’s stability.

With atomic settlement and improved transparency reducing certain old risks and speed and automation introducing new ones, the total impact of tokenization on financial stability is unknown, according to the IMF’s 23-page assessment released on Thursday.

Based on statistics from RWA.xyz, the total value of tokenized assets onchain exceeds $27.6 billion (not including stablecoins). The tokenization market might reach $16 trillion by 2030, according to Boston Consulting Group’s 2022 projection, but a more cautious $2 trillion, according to McKinsey & Co’s 2024 prediction.

Both Positive and Negative Effects

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has said that although tokenization does increase the issuance, trading, settlement, and management of securities and other financial instruments, it also moves risks away from the banking sector and onto shared ledgers and smart contract code.

Tokenization, according to the agency, has both positive and negative aspects. On one hand, it may facilitate speedier cross-border payments and increase financial inclusion in developing nations. On the other hand, it increases the danger of capital flow volatility, currency substitution, and the loss of monetary sovereignty.

Some prominent Wall Street figures, including Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, have advocated for the tokenization of various assets on the blockchain, including equities, bonds, money market funds, and even real estate.

The BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund’s tokenization platform, Securitize, ranks first among RWA tokenization platforms by total value locked at $3.38 billion, according to CryptoDep’s citation of April 1 data.

Intercontinental Exchange, the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, has also taken action, saying in January that it would provide a tokenization platform that allows for the post-trade settlement of exchange-traded funds and equities and the 24/7 trading of these assets using a blockchain technology.

Tokenized markets run the danger of becoming disjointed and unimportant if there is no legal certainty about ownership records and settlement finality, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Hong Kong Stablecoin Licensing Delayed as HKMA Holds Back Approvals

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the potential benefits of tokenization in the financial sector according to the IMF?

AThe IMF acknowledged that tokenization might increase transparency, decrease friction, facilitate speedier cross-border payments, and increase financial inclusion in developing nations.

QWhat is the projected size of the tokenization market by 2030 according to different consulting firms?

ABoston Consulting Group projected the tokenization market might reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey & Co provided a more cautious prediction of $2 trillion in 2024.

QWhat new risks does the IMF associate with the tokenization of assets?

AThe IMF cautioned that tokenization could pose risks such as capital flow volatility, currency substitution, loss of monetary sovereignty, and the danger of markets becoming disjointed due to a lack of legal certainty about ownership records and settlement finality.

QWhich company's tokenization platform currently has the highest total value locked, and what is that value?

ASecuritize, the tokenization platform for the BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund, ranks first with a total value locked of $3.38 billion according to April 1 data.

QWhat action has the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) taken regarding tokenization?

AThe Intercontinental Exchange, parent company of the NYSE, announced in January that it would provide a tokenization platform for the post-trade settlement of exchange-traded funds and equities, enabling 24/7 trading of these assets using blockchain technology.

Letture associate

Selling Block Space is Dead: Public Chains Must Find a New Way

"Blockchain infrastructure as a neutral, generalized platform is no longer a viable business model. This article argues that simply selling block space has failed, evidenced by the fact that only one public blockchain, Hyperliquid, was among 14 crypto firms surpassing $200M in annual revenue recently. Hyperliquid's revenue vastly outpaces others like Arbitrum, highlighting a crisis. The future lies in public chains pivoting away from neutrality to become product studios, application distributors, payment rails, or vertical SaaS providers, directly serving paying customers. The piece also covers key industry events: a major exploit on Ostium, attributed to vulnerabilities in its off-chain price oracle, underscores the critical security needs for protocols bridging off-chain markets. Additionally, it discusses the necessity of abstracting complex financial instruments like options. Experts argue that to achieve mass adoption, options should be packaged as user-friendly products—such as yield vaults, binary options, or structured products—rather than marketed with their technical complexity. Finally, the radar section notes developments including Yearn's fixed-rate lending product Flex, community backlash over Base's strategy changes, the launch of a DXY perpetuals DEX called Plether, and Starknet's focus on institutional-grade privacy and quantum resistance."

marsbit19 min fa

Selling Block Space is Dead: Public Chains Must Find a New Way

marsbit19 min fa

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit30 min fa

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit30 min fa

Send a Message to Transfer Coins? Telegram to 'Stuff' a Crypto Wallet into 1 Billion Users This Summer

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has announced that a native, non-custodial wallet called Gram wallet will be built into every Telegram app this summer. This move aims to provide instant, fee-free cryptocurrency transfers for the platform's over 1 billion monthly active users. Durov described it as the largest deployment of a non-custodial crypto wallet in history. The new wallet, developed by Telegram itself, differs fundamentally from the existing third-party @wallet bot. It will be non-custodial from the start, meaning users will control their private keys. Following the announcement, the GRAM token (formerly Toncoin) saw a price increase of approximately 8%. This initiative is part of Telegram's renewed control over the TON blockchain and its "Make TON Great Again" roadmap, marking a return to the project after a 2018 SEC lawsuit. The launch comes as other super-apps like X Money and Meta are also expanding into digital payments, with Telegram opting for a crypto-native approach. However, key details remain unclear, including the exact launch date beyond "this summer," how the promised zero fees will be implemented technically, and how asset support and private key management will work for mainstream users.

marsbit1 h fa

Send a Message to Transfer Coins? Telegram to 'Stuff' a Crypto Wallet into 1 Billion Users This Summer

marsbit1 h fa

Hyperliquid’s HIP-4 proposal fuels HYPE staking as long-term conviction grows

Hyperliquid has proposed the HIP-4 upgrade to expand from perpetual futures into a broader, permissionless infrastructure layer for on-chain applications, requiring deployers to stake 500,000 HYPE to launch new markets. This shift aims to enable developers to build on its platform, a strategy backed by growing long-term investor conviction. Evidence includes a major trader staking millions in HYPE instead of taking profits, with total staked tokens reaching 43.9% of the supply, reducing available tokens and strengthening network security. Market metrics like high open interest and balanced funding rates suggest measured, non-speculative trader positioning. Sustained growth in protocol revenue, TVL, and governance participation further supports the positive outlook, contingent on continued user adoption and successful upgrade execution.

ambcrypto1 h fa

Hyperliquid’s HIP-4 proposal fuels HYPE staking as long-term conviction grows

ambcrypto1 h fa

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

Trading

Spot