ICP rallies 22%, then slips 8% – What comes next after this volatility?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-12-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-22

Introduzione

Internet Computer (ICP) experienced significant volatility, rallying 22.6% from a recent low before retracting 8.46% within hours. This movement occurred amid statements from Dfinity Foundation regarding AI-powered no-code tools enhancing secure application infrastructure. Technically, ICP fully retraced its November rally and must reclaim $3.78 to shift to a bullish structure. Lower-timeframe traders might consider buying with a stop-loss under $2.9, but the overall trend remains bearish until key resistance is broken. Market-wide sentiment, including Bitcoin's bearishness, suggests continued sell pressure on altcoins from profit-taking.

The Vice President of Dfinity Foundation, Lomesh Dutta, said that the rise of AI-powered no-code tools for the generation and evolution of applications will enable secure, stable, tamper-resistant infrastructure.

This could help prevent the kind of outage that many crypto companies and Web3 applications faced in the aftermath of the AWS outage in October.

Dfinity Foundation is a non-profit organization that guides the Internet Computer [ICP] blockchain development.

These statements could have brought ICP back to the public eye, helping explain the recent rally. ICP gained 22.6% from Friday’s low, but has faced a minor pullback in recent hours of trading.

Profit-taking activity wipes out ICP’s November rally

The 3-day chart showed a bearish internal structure and a complete retracement of the November rally from $2.79 to $9.85. It was expected that the $5 and the $4.3 supports would be defended, but these expectations were proven wrong.

The DMI did not show a strong trend in progress, but its confusing signals served to capture the speed of the recent impulse move and the subsequent retracement. The OBV was slowly bleeding lower, and the MACD also displayed bearish momentum.

To flip the structure bullishly, ICP has to move back above $3.78.

The 4-hour chart showcased an imbalance at the $3.2 area, highlighted in white. This imbalance came after a bullish structure break on this timeframe. At the time of writing, ICP was facing a minor price dip, having shed 8.46% in under 12 hours.

The technical indicators were in favor of the bulls, but traders must remember that the higher timeframe structure is still bearish. Until a move beyond $3.78 comes about, traders need to be careful about taking bullish positions.

Assessing the next ICP move

The market-wide sentiment, especially for Bitcoin [BTC], remained mostly bearish. Until this changes bullishly, it remains likely that altcoins that make strong gains will run into heavy sell pressure from profit-taking activity.

Lower timeframe traders can look to buy ICP now, with a stop-loss below the local support at $2.9.

Traders’ call to action- remain bearish

Until the $3.78 level is breached by a 3-day timeframe candle close, swing traders can remain bearish. The 1-day timeframe also highlights the same local resistance as a key swing point.


Final Thoughts

  • The rise of AI-powered no-code tools that were brought to public attention recently could have helped Internet Computer post some of its recent gains.
  • The price action remained in favor of the bears over the past month, and traders should be wary of going long until the structure shifts bullishly.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the main reason mentioned for the recent rally in ICP's price?

AThe rise of AI-powered no-code tools for application generation and evolution, which brought ICP back to public attention.

QWhat key price level must ICP surpass to flip its structure bullishly according to the article?

AICP must move back above $3.78 to flip the structure bullishly.

QWhat was the percentage decline ICP faced in under 12 hours at the time of writing?

AICP shed 8.46% in under 12 hours at the time of writing.

QWhat is the suggested stop-loss level for lower timeframe traders considering buying ICP?

AThe suggested stop-loss is below the local support at $2.9.

QWhy should traders remain bearish on ICP until the $3.78 level is breached?

ABecause the higher timeframe structure remains bearish, and a close above $3.78 is needed to shift the structure bullishly.

Letture associate

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报32 min fa

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报32 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News50 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News50 min fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 h fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ICP

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Internet Computer (ICP) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Internet ComputerICP.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Internet Computer (ICP)Dopo aver acquistato Internet Computer (ICP), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Internet Computer (ICP)Scambia facilmente Internet Computer (ICP) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

215 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.12Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare ICP

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ICP ICP sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片