Hyperliquid defies altcoin weakness: What’s driving HYPE’s demand?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-28

Introduzione

Despite unfavorable market conditions for most altcoins, with the Altcoin Season Index at only 34/100, Hyperliquid (HYPE) is showing notable resilience. While major peers like Ethereum and Solana weakened sharply, HYPE traded near $26.71, holding key support levels. This strength is driven by Hyperliquid's fundamentals: its TVL surged from near zero in early 2024 to over $6 billion by late 2025, and protocol fees frequently spike between $6 million and $12 million, reflecting sustained trading activity. The protocol's perpetual DEX generates strong real volume, and its Coinbase listing has expanded institutional access. Additionally, Hyperliquid Strategies ($PURR) holds roughly $356 million in unrealized gains, standing out as the only major strategy in positive territory. Whale accumulation via OTC desks, such as a recent $6.06 million purchase through Galaxy Digital, indicates deliberate institutional scaling, tightening circulating supply and strengthening demand-side pressure.

Market conditions remain unfavorable for most altcoins as Bitcoin [BTC] continues to dominate capital flows.

At press time, the Altcoin Season Index stood at 34/100, showing that fewer than 35% of the top 100 altcoins outperform Bitcoin over 90 days.

Within this environment, Hyperliquid [HYPE] began to diverge from the broader market structure.

Meanwhile, major peers weakened sharply; at the time of writing, Ethereum [ETH] traded below $1,900, while Solana [SOL] fell toward $78, both experiencing deeper drawdowns during the correction phase. In contrast, HYPE traded near $26.71, declining modestly while still holding its key support levels.

Underlying fundamentals explain this resilience. Hyperliquid’s TVL expanded from near zero in early 2024 to above $6 billion by late 2025, signaling rapid protocol adoption.

At the same time, protocol fees frequently spike between $6 million and $12 million, reflecting sustained trading activity.

This resilience reflects structural drivers. Hyperliquid’s perpetual DEX produces strong real trading volume, while the Coinbase listing expands institutional access. As broader altcoins track Bitcoin’s weakness, HYPE increasingly trades its cycle.

How HYPE defied sector-wide DAT losses

Protocol development around HIP-4 continues to expand Hyperliquid’s long-term utility layer. Yet alongside this technical progress, treasury positioning reveals another layer of market strength. Digital asset treasury data now highlights a clear divergence across major strategies.

Most DAT positions remained deeply underwater as market drawdowns pressured balance sheets. Several treasury allocations show unrealized losses amounting to more than $7 billion, reflecting accumulation during earlier market highs.

As prices pulled back across the broader crypto sector, these positions have faced sustained negative mark‐to‐market performance.

Within this environment, Hyperliquid Strategies ($PURR) stands out. The treasury currently holds roughly $356 million in unrealized gains, making it the only strategy maintaining positive territory.

This contrast underscores a structural difference. While many treasury strategies struggle with legacy positions, Hyperliquid’s ecosystem continues generating strong protocol activity.

As perpetual trading volumes remain high and fees accumulate, treasury exposure tied to the protocol maintains stronger mark-to-market resilience.

Whales quietly accumulate HYPE

Institutional accumulation of HYPE continues to surface through large OTC transactions. A whale recently purchased 215,056 HYPE, valued at $6.06 million, through Galaxy Digital’s OTC desk. This purchase adds to earlier transfers over the past 18 days, steadily expanding the same wallet’s holdings.

As accumulation continued, the address increased its balance to 540,337 HYPE, now worth nearly $14.86 million. Earlier transactions included 181,430 HYPE, 108,010 HYPE, and 35,840 HYPE, all routed through Galaxy Global Markets’ OTC channel.

This pattern indicates deliberate scaling rather than single-event buying. OTC desks allow large participants to build positions without disrupting open market liquidity.

Meanwhile, these flows appear alongside a tightening circulating supply. As whales accumulate through off-exchange channels, fewer tokens reach public markets.

This dynamic gradually strengthens demand-side pressure while institutions position themselves ahead of potential market recovery.


Final Summary

  • Hyperliquid [HYPE] diverges from the broader altcoin market as TVL above $6 billion and sustained protocol fees reinforce underlying network demand.
  • Hyperliquid accumulation through whale OTC purchases and $356 million unrealized gains in Hyperliquid Strategies ($PURR) reflects strengthening institutional conviction.

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the current Altcoin Season Index and what does it indicate about the market?

AThe Altcoin Season Index stands at 34/100, indicating that fewer than 35% of the top 100 altcoins are outperforming Bitcoin over the last 90 days.

QHow did Hyperliquid's (HYPE) price performance compare to major peers like Ethereum and Solana during the market correction?

AWhile Ethereum traded below $1,900 and Solana fell toward $78, experiencing deeper drawdowns, HYPE traded near $26.71, declining only modestly while holding its key support levels.

QWhat two key fundamental metrics demonstrate Hyperliquid's rapid protocol adoption and resilience?

AHyperliquid's TVL expanded from near zero in early 2024 to over $6 billion by late 2025, and protocol fees frequently spiked between $6 million and $12 million, reflecting sustained trading activity.

QWhat makes Hyperliquid Strategies ($PURR) stand out in terms of treasury performance compared to other digital asset treasury strategies?

AHyperliquid Strategies ($PURR) holds roughly $356 million in unrealized gains, making it the only strategy maintaining positive territory, while most other DAT positions remained deeply underwater with unrealized losses.

QHow are large institutional investors (whales) accumulating HYPE, and what is the impact on the circulating supply?

AWhales are accumulating HYPE through large OTC transactions via desks like Galaxy Digital, which allows them to build positions without disrupting open market liquidity. This pattern tightens the circulating supply as fewer tokens reach public markets, strengthening demand-side pressure.

Letture associate

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit3 min fa

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit3 min fa

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit4 min fa

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit4 min fa

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News14 min fa

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News14 min fa

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit31 min fa

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit31 min fa

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手43 min fa

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手43 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare HYPE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Hyperliquid (HYPE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente HyperliquidHYPE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Hyperliquid (HYPE)Dopo aver acquistato Hyperliquid (HYPE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Hyperliquid (HYPE)Scambia facilmente Hyperliquid (HYPE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

330 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare HYPE

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di HYPE HYPE sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片