Hyperliquid: Can $100mln revenue from third-party apps fuel HYPE’s rally?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-24

Introduzione

Hyperliquid is gaining significant traction, driven by two key factors: trading of non-crypto assets (HIP-3) like oil and gold, which accounted for 40% of daily volumes in March, and integrations with third-party platforms such as Phantom and MetaMask via builder codes. Together, these now generate $100 million in annual revenue, representing 19% of Hyperliquid's total revenue share. Builder codes alone contribute 10% of total trading volumes. This growth has positively impacted HYPE, the platform's native token, as a significant portion of revenue is used for token buybacks, creating buying pressure. In Q1 2026, a surge in perp volumes and revenues led to a substantial price appreciation from $20 to $43. Although the price has retraced below $40, bullish whale activity suggests support around the $35-$50 range, with potential for a move toward $50 if the positive trend continues.

Hyperliquid has been hitting headlines lately, thanks to the growing interest in non-crypto assets (HIP-3) such as oil, gold, and silver trading on the platform.

In March alone, HIP-3 volumes accounted for 40% of total Hyperliquid daily volumes as the West Asia crisis dragged on.

Below the surface, however, HIP-3 isn’t the only growth driver. Builder codes or integration with other platforms, such as Phantom and MetaMask wallets, has also seen incredible adoption.

Source: Syncracy Capital

Collectively, HIP-3 and builder codes (third-party ecosystem) now generate $100 million annual revenue for Hyperliquid – About 19% of total revenue share.

In terms of trading volumes alone, builder codes account for 10% of total volumes, primarily from mobile interfaces.

These are platforms like Phantom, which have plugged Hyperliquid under the hood to empower their perp offerings. For every trade made via these integrations, a fee-sharing model applies between Hyperliquid and the builder.

Source: Syncracy Capital (Builder codes vs HIP-3 revenues)

According to Ryan Watkins, co-founder of crypto VC firm Syncracy Capital, the two factors were ‘accelerating adoption’ for Hyperliquid.

Impact on HYPE?

Now, how does this monster adoption impact HYPE value or tokenholders? Well, since most of the revenue goes toward the token buyback program, buying pressure may trigger HYPE appreciation, especially in a positive macro environment.

In fact, this is exactly what happened in Q1 2026. As perp volumes doubled from $40B to nearly $90B, weekly revenues doubled too from less than $9M to over $22M.

This made HYPE retracement to stabilize around $20, setting up a breakout to $38- Marking a whopping 86% run. After a cool-off to $25, the second phase lifted HYPE to $43, a massive 71% upswing.

Source: DeFiLlama

In other words, under positive market sentiment, the strong adoption is a flywheel for HYPE and tokenholders.

What’s next for HYPE price?

At the time of writing, HYPE had retraced part of its recent gains and traded below $40. But some whales kept bidding as the price retraced, underscoring that some players remained bullish on the altcoin.

Even so, HYPE was back in its H2 2025 price range of $35-50, and defending the range lows could increase the odds of hitting $50.

Source: HYPE/USDT, TradingView

Final Summary

  • Non-crypto assets and integration with other platforms now generate $100M annual revenue to Hyperliquid
  • The massive adoption has been net positive for HYPE, and bulls may defend the $35-$50 price range if the trend continues.

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the two main growth drivers for Hyperliquid mentioned in the article?

AThe two main growth drivers are HIP-3 (non-crypto assets like oil, gold, and silver trading) and builder codes (integration with third-party platforms like Phantom and MetaMask wallets).

QHow much annual revenue do HIP-3 and builder codes collectively generate for Hyperliquid, and what percentage of the total revenue share is this?

AHIP-3 and builder codes collectively generate $100 million in annual revenue, which accounts for about 19% of Hyperliquid's total revenue share.

QAccording to the article, how does the revenue from third-party apps impact the HYPE token?

AMost of the revenue is used for a token buyback program, which creates buying pressure and can lead to HYPE token appreciation, especially in a positive macro environment.

QWhat was the price range for HYPE in H2 2025, as stated in the article?

AThe price range for HYPE in H2 2025 was $35 to $50.

QWho is Ryan Watkins and what did he say about Hyperliquid's growth factors?

ARyan Watkins is the co-founder of crypto VC firm Syncracy Capital. He stated that HIP-3 and builder codes were 'accelerating adoption' for Hyperliquid.

Letture associate

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News11 min fa

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News11 min fa

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit28 min fa

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit28 min fa

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手40 min fa

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手40 min fa

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit55 min fa

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit55 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare HYPE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Hyperliquid (HYPE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente HyperliquidHYPE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Hyperliquid (HYPE)Dopo aver acquistato Hyperliquid (HYPE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Hyperliquid (HYPE)Scambia facilmente Hyperliquid (HYPE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

330 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare HYPE

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di HYPE HYPE sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片