Hyperliquid becomes ‘most liquid venue for crypto price discovery’- What does it mean?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-27Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-27

Introduzione

Hyperliquid has achieved significant traction, becoming a leading venue for crypto price discovery with deeper liquidity than Binance, according to its founder. The platform has seen over $1 billion in trading volume for its equity perpetuals and near-record open interest of $800 billion. Its native token, HYPE, surged 24% to $28, though it faces a key resistance level. Analysts suggest the recovery is supported by eased selling pressure from monthly unlocks and whales, as well as substantial accumulation by top buyers. However, sustained price growth depends on increased platform revenue driving token buybacks.

Hyperliquid has recorded remarkable traction in equity and crypto perpetuals (perps). Perps are contracts that allow traders to speculate on price movements without a fixed maturity.

The recently deployed equity perps (HIP-3), which allow traders to bet on traditional stocks with leverage, have crossed $1 billion in trading volume.

Additionally, the daily Open Interest (OI) was nearing a record high of $800 billion. This further underscored strong demand despite an overall lull in the crypto market.

On Bitcoin perps, Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan said,

“Hyperliquid has quietly achieved an important milestone of becoming the most liquid venue for crypto price discovery in the world.”

He cited the platform’s liquidity depth, which showed thicker order books than Binance. But will this boost the native token’s recovery?

Will HYPE extend its 24% recovery?

Following the update on the massive traction, HYPE posted a 24% jump in the past 24 hours. It rose from $22 to $28. But it also reached an overhead hurdle that may derail further recovery if bulls fail to clear it.

The $28 price area (red zone) has been a key short-term supply pressure since mid-December and may block bulls again if momentum falters at the level. If they clear it and top $30, then a clear run to $35 may be feasible.

What could drive HYPE’s recovery?

Overall, HYPE was still down 52% from its record high of $59 hit in September 2025. But according to analyst Ericonomic, some of the bearish catalysts that drove the downtrend have significantly eased.

The feared monthly unlocks (9.92 million HYPE), for example, saw only 10% of the supply sold off in the past two months. For Ericonometric, this was a ‘trickle’ rather than a ‘cliff’ that was priced in during the late 2025 dump.

The only problem, the analyst added, was that Hyperliquid Strategies was accumulating these team unlocks. This could limit the treasury firm’s ability to buy more HYPE off the spot market directly.

Besides, several whales, including Fasanara Capital, Tornado Cash player, and Continue Capital, have been persistent sellers, but the pressure had eased, the analyst noted.

The top 10 buyers had accumulated nearly $200 million in HYPE in the past 30 days, further helping stabilize prices above $20.

Finally, a significant portion of long leveraged positions have been wiped out and have presented a structural setup for a bullish recovery. However, the platform’s revenue was still muted despite growing traction.

For a sustained price recovery to be possible, Hyperliquid’s revenue neeeds to reverse higher to drive more HYPE buybacks.


Final Thoughts

  • Hyperliquid’s founder said the platform now rivals Binance as the most liquid venue for crypto price discovery.
  • Analysts believe HYPE’s recovery was likely amid overblown monthly unlock fears and easing selling pressure from whales.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat milestone did Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan claim the platform has achieved?

AHyperliquid has become the most liquid venue for crypto price discovery in the world.

QWhat type of contracts, specifically mentioned in the article, have seen over $1 billion in trading volume on Hyperliquid?

AEquity perpetuals (perps), which allow traders to bet on traditional stocks with leverage.

QWhat was the key overhead price hurdle for the HYPE token that could block further recovery?

AThe $28 price area, which has been a key short-term supply pressure since mid-December.

QAccording to analyst Ericonometric, what was the feared monthly token unlocks actually like, and how much was sold?

AThe unlocks were a 'trickle' rather than a 'cliff,' with only 10% of the supply sold off in the past two months.

QWhat does the article state is necessary for a sustained price recovery of the HYPE token?

AHyperliquid's revenue needs to reverse higher to drive more HYPE buybacks.

Letture associate

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit23 min fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit23 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit43 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit43 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit51 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit51 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片