Hyperbeat: Launching a 'Bank' on Hyperliquid

marsbitPubblicato 2026-04-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-09

Introduzione

Hyperbeat, a protocol built on Hyperliquid, has launched "Liquid Banking," a self-custodial banking solution deployed on HyperEVM. It integrates stablecoin deposits, VISA card spending, perpetual trading, and multi-currency fiat on/off ramps into a single on-chain smart wallet. The core feature is "Credit Mode," powered by Morpho's lending engine. Users deposit assets like BTC or ETH as collateral. When spending with the VISA card, the system instantly borrows stablecoins via Morpho to complete payments, while the collateral remains on-chain earning yield. There is no grace period—interest accrues immediately upon spending. Hyperbeat uses its native stablecoin, beatUSD, issued in partnership with Paxos. Deposit yields come from real borrowing interest generated by consumer spending. Fiat services are provided by Noah, supporting multiple currencies, and the VISA card is issued by Third National via infrastructure from Rain. As a self-custodial system, user assets stay in their smart wallet. To prevent fraud, withdrawals require a cooling period and operator approval for collateral removal. The system emphasizes transparency and on-chain security but places responsibility on users to manage their account health, with no customer support to reverse errors.

On April 8, Hyperliquid's native protocol Hyperbeat launched Liquid Banking, a self-custodied 'bank' deployed on HyperEVM, integrating stablecoin deposits, VISA card spending, perpetual contract trading, and multi-currency fiat on/off ramps into a single on-chain smart wallet.

The Hyperbeat team transitioned from being among the first validators on the Hyperliquid testnet. Initially just 5 people, they self-funded a start with approximately $200,000. The two co-founders, Kilian Boshoff(@Fundi_Crypto) and 800.HL(@degennQuant), maintain a low profile; the former has a background from Stellenbosch University in South Africa. The company is registered in the Cayman Islands.

In August 2025, it completed a $5.2 million seed round co-led by ether.fi Ventures and Electric Capital, with participation from Coinbase Ventures, Maelstrom, Anchorage Digital, and others, valuing the company at approximately $40 million.

Morpho Provides the Engine, Building a 'Bank' in Ten Months

The core selling point of Liquid Banking is Credit Mode.

Users deposit assets like BTC, ETH, HYPE, etc., as collateral. When swiping the VISA card, the system instantly borrows stablecoins through the Morpho Blue market to complete the payment, while the collateral remains on-chain, continuing to generate yield. The user never interacts with a borrowing interface; the act of swiping the card is itself an on-chain loan.

The underlying lending engine comes from Morpho. Hyperbeat integrates Morpho into the user's smart wallet through an on-chain whitelist mechanism. Currently, Credit Mode operates on six isolated markets, with collateral covering HYPE, UBTC, UETH, USOL, and even the gold token XAUT.

Hyperbeat does not touch the core lending logic; Morpho does not touch the user interface. The former builds the 'bank frontend,' the latter supplies the 'credit engine.'

Stablecoin deposits for Liquid Banking center around beatUSD, a native stablecoin issued in partnership with Paxos Labs. Paxos provides the stablecoin infrastructure (underpinned by USDG0). The yield from the reserves flows directly back into Hyperbeat's rewards program and is ultimately distributed to users, rather than remaining with the issuer.

The deposit-side USD+ vault automatically allocates user funds to protocols like Morpho, Hypuur, Hyperlend, Felix, etc., offering 3%-8% APY.

The yield comes from the real borrowing interest paid by Credit Mode consumers. The more spending, the higher the deposit yield. But the sustainability of this cycle depends on the volume of real consumption.

Spend Without Selling Crypto, But Interest Accrues Immediately on Swipe

Fiat on/off ramps for Liquid Banking are provided by Noah, supporting USD (ACH, FedWire) and EUR (SEPA) deposits, with a unique IBAN bound to each account.

In March 2026, direct top-ups and withdrawals for Vietnamese Dong and Malaysian Ringgit were added. Withdrawals also cover over ten currencies including British Pounds, Dirhams, and Thai Baht.

The VISA card is issued by Third National, with underlying infrastructure from Rain, a Visa Principal Member. By early January 2026, Rain's financing round valued it at $1.95 billion, with an annualized processing volume exceeding $3 billion, covering over a hundred countries.

The card tier is Visa Signature,附带机场贵宾厅等权益 (includes benefits like airport lounge access). Foreign currency transactions incur a 1% FX fee (based on Visa's official exchange rate), with no annual fee and no transaction fees; ATM withdrawals cost $1 + 0.65%; the default monthly spending limit is $100,000.

The borrowing利率 (interest rate) for Credit Mode fluctuates with the utilization rate of the Morpho market, but there is no grace period. Every instance of 'spending without selling crypto' starts accruing interest the second the card is swiped.

Hyperbeat's official 'no hidden fees' refers to the transparency of the yield strategy, not the card's fee pricing. The Credit Mode borrowing rate is dynamically determined by the Morpho market. The lack of a grace period means the real-time cost of the convenience of 'spending without selling crypto' exists and is not low.

The Cost of Self-Custody is a One-Day Cooling Period

Unlike all centralized crypto cards, user assets always remain in their self-controlled ManagementAccount smart wallet. The Hyperbeat backend only has a restricted Operator role, able to execute settlements only within user-set limits and unable to transfer assets to unauthorized addresses.

But self-custody must solve one problem: what if a user withdraws funds right after swiping the card? Hyperbeat introduces an on-chain timelock mechanism.

Withdrawing settlement tokens requires a cooling period and a confirmation process. Withdrawing collateral requires Operator approval to prevent bad debt. Switching modes also has a delay. The contracts were audited by Zellic and Nethermind, with key management provided by Turnkey.

These frictions are not a bug; they are a feature. They acknowledge the speed difference between on-chain settlement and offline consumption, filling the gap with contract rules rather than 'please believe us.' But users must monitor their health factor themselves; there is no customer service to undo operational mistakes.

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the core feature of Hyperbeat's Liquid Banking product launched on Hyperliquid?

AThe core feature is Credit Mode, which allows users to spend stablecoins borrowed instantly via Morpho Blue markets using their crypto assets as collateral, all within a single on-chain smart wallet without manually interacting with a lending interface.

QWhich companies were the lead investors in Hyperbeat's $5.2 million seed round and what was the valuation?

AThe seed round was co-led by ether.fi Ventures and Electric Capital, with participation from CoinBase Ventures, Maelstrom, and Anchorage Digital, valuing the company at approximately $40 million.

QHow does Hyperbeat's Credit Mode generate yield for stablecoin depositors?

AYield is generated from the real borrowing interest paid by consumers using Credit Mode. User deposits are automatically allocated to protocols like Morpho, Hypuur, Hyperlend, and Felix, with the interest from spending/borrowing flowing back to the reward program and ultimately to depositors.

QWhat is a key operational difference and potential cost for users of the Hyperbeat VISA card compared to traditional credit cards?

AA key difference is that there is no interest-free grace period. Borrowing interest starts accruing from the very second a transaction is made, and the rate is dynamically determined by the Morpho market's utilization.

QWhat is a key security feature and its associated user trade-off in Hyperbeat's self-custody model?

AA key security feature is the on-chain timelock and cooldown period for withdrawing settled tokens or collateral, which prevents bad debt but introduces a delay (e.g., a one-day cooldown) and requires users to actively manage their health factor without the ability for customer support to reverse mistakes.

Letture associate

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News11 min fa

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News11 min fa

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit28 min fa

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit28 min fa

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手40 min fa

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手40 min fa

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit54 min fa

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit54 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Cosa è $BANK

Banca AI: Un Passo Rivoluzionario nel Futuro della Banca Introduzione In un'era caratterizzata da rapidi progressi tecnologici, Banca AI si trova all'incrocio tra intelligenza artificiale (AI) e servizi bancari. Questo progetto innovativo mira a ridefinire il panorama finanziario, migliorando l'efficienza operativa, le misure di sicurezza e le esperienze dei clienti attraverso il potere dell'AI. Mentre ci impegniamo in questa esplorazione di Banca AI, esamineremo cosa comporta il progetto, le sue dinamiche operative, il suo contesto storico e i traguardi significativi. Cos'è Banca AI? Alla sua essenza, Banca AI rappresenta un'iniziativa trasformativa volta a integrare l'intelligenza artificiale in varie operazioni bancarie. Questo progetto sfrutta le capacità dell'AI per automatizzare processi, migliorare i protocolli di gestione del rischio e potenziare l'interazione con i clienti attraverso servizi personalizzati. Gli obiettivi principali di Banca AI includono: Automazione delle Funzioni Bancarie: Sfruttando le tecnologie AI, Banca AI mira ad automatizzare compiti di routine, riducendo il carico sulle risorse umane e aumentando l'efficienza. Miglioramento della Gestione del Rischio: Il progetto utilizza algoritmi AI per prevedere e identificare i rischi, rafforzando così le misure di sicurezza contro le frodi e altre minacce. Personalizzazione dei Servizi Bancari: Banca AI si concentra sull'offrire prodotti e servizi finanziari su misura analizzando i dati e i comportamenti dei clienti. Miglioramento dell'Esperienza del Cliente: L'implementazione di soluzioni guidate dall'AI, come chatbot e assistenti virtuali, mira a fornire agli utenti interazioni più umane, rivoluzionando il modo in cui i clienti si relazionano con le banche. Con questi obiettivi, Banca AI si posiziona come un attore cruciale nel rendere la banca più efficiente, sicura e centrata sull'utente. Chi è il Creatore di Banca AI? I dettagli riguardanti il creatore di Banca AI rimangono sconosciuti. Pertanto, non è stata identificata alcuna persona o organizzazione specifica nelle informazioni disponibili. L'anonimato che circonda la nascita del progetto solleva domande, ma non sminuisce la sua ambiziosa visione e obiettivi. Chi sono gli Investitori di Banca AI? Simile al creatore del progetto, informazioni specifiche riguardo gli investitori o le organizzazioni di supporto di Banca AI non sono state divulgate. Senza queste informazioni, è difficile delineare il sostegno finanziario e istituzionale che potrebbe spingere il progetto in avanti. Tuttavia, l'importanza di avere una solida base di investimento è fondamentale per sostenere lo sviluppo in un campo così innovativo. Come Funziona Banca AI? Banca AI opera su più fronti innovativi, concentrandosi su fattori unici che la differenziano dai framework bancari tradizionali. Di seguito sono riportate le caratteristiche operative chiave: Automazione: Applicando algoritmi di machine learning, Banca AI automatizza vari processi manuali all'interno delle banche. Ciò si traduce in una riduzione dei costi operativi e consente ai lavoratori umani di reindirizzare i propri sforzi verso attività più strategiche. Gestione Avanzata del Rischio: L'integrazione dell'AI nelle pratiche di gestione del rischio fornisce alle banche strumenti per prevedere con precisione potenziali minacce come le frodi, garantendo che le informazioni e i beni dei clienti rimangano al sicuro. Raccomandazioni Finanziarie Personalizzate: Attraverso l'apprendimento continuo dalle interazioni con i clienti, i sistemi AI sviluppano una comprensione sfumata delle esigenze degli utenti, consentendo loro di offrire consigli su misura per le decisioni finanziarie. Interazioni Migliorate con i Clienti: Utilizzando chatbot e assistenti virtuali alimentati dall'AI, Banca AI consente un'esperienza cliente più coinvolgente, permettendo agli utenti di risolvere rapidamente le loro richieste, riducendo così i tempi di attesa e migliorando i livelli di soddisfazione. Tutte queste caratteristiche operative posizionano Banca AI come un pioniere nel settore bancario, stabilendo nuovi standard per la fornitura di servizi e l'eccellenza operativa. Timeline di Banca AI Comprendere la traiettoria di Banca AI richiede uno sguardo al suo contesto storico. Di seguito è riportata una timeline che evidenzia traguardi e sviluppi importanti: Inizio 2010: La concettualizzazione dell'integrazione dell'AI nei servizi bancari ha cominciato a guadagnare attenzione mentre le istituzioni bancarie riconoscevano i potenziali benefici. 2018: Si è verificato un aumento significativo nell'implementazione delle tecnologie AI quando le banche hanno iniziato a utilizzare strumenti AI come i chatbot per servizi clienti di base e sistemi di gestione del rischio per migliorare la sicurezza. 2023: La sofisticazione dell'AI ha continuato ad avanzare, con l'introduzione dell'AI generativa per compiti più complessi come l'elaborazione di documenti e l'analisi degli investimenti in tempo reale. Quest'anno ha segnato un significativo salto nelle capacità offerte alle banche dalla tecnologia AI. 2024-Stato Attuale: A partire da quest'anno, Banca AI è su una traiettoria ascendente, con ricerche e sviluppi in corso pronti a migliorare ulteriormente le capacità nelle operazioni bancarie. L'esplorazione continua delle applicazioni AI suggerisce sviluppi entusiasmanti in arrivo. Punti Chiave su Banca AI Integrazione dell'AI nella Banca: Banca AI si concentra sull'adozione dell'intelligenza artificiale per snellire i processi bancari e migliorare le esperienze degli utenti. Focus su Automazione e Gestione del Rischio: Il progetto enfatizza fortemente queste aree, mirando a spostare il carico di compiti di routine mentre migliora le strutture di sicurezza attraverso analisi predittive. Soluzioni Bancarie Personalizzate: Sfruttando i dati dei clienti, Banca AI consente servizi bancari su misura che si adattano alle esigenze individuali degli utenti. Impegno per lo Sviluppo: Banca AI rimane impegnata in sforzi di ricerca e sviluppo continuativi, garantendo la sua adattabilità e rilevanza continua man mano che la tecnologia continua a evolversi. Conclusione In sintesi, Banca AI rappresenta un passo cruciale in avanti nell'industria bancaria, sfruttando l'intelligenza artificiale per rimodellare i paradigmi operativi, migliorare la sicurezza e promuovere la soddisfazione del cliente. Nonostante le lacune nelle informazioni riguardo il creatore e gli investitori, gli obiettivi chiari e i meccanismi funzionali di Banca AI forniscono una solida base per la sua continua evoluzione. Mentre la tecnologia AI continua ad avanzare e fondersi con il settore bancario, Banca AI è ben posizionata per avere un impatto significativo sul futuro dei servizi finanziari, migliorando il modo in cui comprendiamo e interagiamo con la banca.

132 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.04.06Aggiornato il 2024.12.03

Cosa è $BANK

Come comprare BANK

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Lorenzo ProtocolBANK.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Dopo aver acquistato Lorenzo Protocol (BANK), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Scambia facilmente Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

727 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.05.09Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare BANK

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di BANK BANK sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片