HYPE price prediction – Identifying the next liquidity target for traders

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-12

Introduzione

HYPE's price rebounded strongly after defending the ascending trendline support near $28, signaling renewed bullish momentum. On-chain data shows transaction fees have dropped significantly, suggesting lower acquisition costs and potential for increased trading activity. A key liquidity cluster of approximately $1.32 million is identified around $37.20, which may act as a near-term target if bullish momentum continues. With the Stochastic RSI bouncing from oversold conditions and buyers maintaining control, all factors point toward a potential upward move toward the $37.20 level, provided the current support holds and volatility expands.

HYPE’s price action is again under the bulls’ control.

The altcoin posted strong daily gains after rejecting the ascending trendline support near $28. Buyers stepped in decisively at that level. As expected, the reaction was sharp and at press time, the structure was intact.

In fact, the token’s trendline seemed to be holding strong too. The support defence initiated a short-term shift in HYPE‘s bullish run momentum

The $28-zone has historically acted as a clear line of defence against further dips. However, while the sellers pushed the price lower, the market bulls responded immediately.The price rebound at the point of demand around $28 suggested that long position takers were active along the rising support. Usually, when ascending trendlines hold during pullbacks, it is often a sign of continuation not breakdown.

In HYPE’s case, the Stochastic RSI was just bouncing from an oversold zone too – Further affirming that the bullish run could be far from over.

Lower fees can change behavior

Still, a follow-through buying phase matters.

According to the recent on-chain data, HYPE’s transaction fees have dropped sharply lately, falling to around $2 million. This hinted at a lower cost of acquiring the token.

Consequently, a corresponding trading activity surge can be projected in the near term. This could instil more volatility into the market and accelerate the prevailing bullish momentum.

Liquidity cluster at $37.20 in focus

That’s not all though as above the press time levels sits a notable liquidity cluster worth approximately $1.32 million at around $37.20.

As has historically been the case, markets are drawn to liquidity. When volatility expands, the price often gravitates towards these zones. If bullish momentum continues to build, this cluster can act as a near-term magnet.

A move towards $37.20 would not only test liquidity. Instead, it would also confirm strength above the recent support defence.

What’s next for HYPE?

HYPE has defended its trendline support. Fees have dropped and volatility may expand too.

In other words, all the factors for continuation are present. If buyers maintain control and trading activity increases, the $37.20 liquidity pocket could be the next logical destination.

For now though, bulls hold the edge. Despite the fact that momentum needs confirmation.

Final Thoughts

HYPE bounced strongly from the ascending trendline support near $28.
A $1.32M liquidity cluster at $37.20 could attract the price if momentum builds.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat key support level did HYPE's price recently defend, and what was the market reaction?

AHYPE's price recently defended the ascending trendline support near $28. The market reaction was sharp and bullish, with buyers stepping in decisively at that level, initiating a short-term shift in the bullish run momentum.

QAccording to the on-chain data, what change in HYPE's transaction fees was observed, and what does it suggest?

AAccording to recent on-chain data, HYPE's transaction fees have dropped sharply to around $2 million. This suggests a lower cost of acquiring the token and could project a surge in trading activity, instilling more volatility and accelerating the bullish momentum.

QWhere is the significant liquidity cluster located above the current price, and what is its estimated value?

AThere is a significant liquidity cluster located at approximately $37.20, with an estimated value of $1.32 million.

QWhat is the significance of an ascending trendline holding during a pullback, as mentioned in the article?

AWhen an ascending trendline holds during a pullback, it is often a sign of continuation rather than a breakdown, indicating that the prevailing bullish trend is likely to persist.

QWhat does the article suggest is the next logical price target for HYPE if bullish momentum continues?

AThe article suggests that if buyers maintain control and trading activity increases, the next logical price target for HYPE is the liquidity pocket at $37.20.

Letture associate

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, is facing significant technical challenges as its growth outpaces its current infrastructure on Polygon. Users are experiencing laggy transactions, unresponsive orders, and delayed confirmations, severely impacting the trading experience. In response, DeFi Engineering VP Josh Stevens outlined a comprehensive engineering overhaul. The plan includes reducing on-chain data delays, fixing order cancellation issues, rebuilding the central limit order book (CLOB), improving website performance, and developing a unified SDK and API. A major revelation was the ongoing "chain migration," indicating a potential move away from Polygon. The core issue is that Polymarket has evolved from a simple prediction market into a high-frequency trading platform, making Polygon's limitations—such as block space, gas fees, and block time—a ceiling for further growth. The migration is not just a simple chain switch but a fundamental rebuild of its trading system to support more complex products like perpetual contracts (Perps). This announcement has sparked competition among chains like Solana, Sui, and Algorand, all vying to host Polymarket. For Polygon, losing this key application, which contributes significantly to its gas fee revenue, would be a major setback. The real test for Polymarket is no longer attracting users but proving it can provide a stable, reliable trading environment that retains them.

Odaily星球日报9 min fa

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Odaily星球日报9 min fa

Key Lawmaker 'Relents', Wash's Biggest Obstacle to Assuming Fed Chair on May 15 Cleared

Key political opposition to Kevin Warsh's nomination as Federal Reserve Chair has been removed after Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) withdrew his objection, clearing the way for a committee vote on April 29. Tillis had previously blocked the nomination due to a criminal investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell, which he viewed as a threat to Fed independence. The Justice Department has since dropped the investigation. Warsh, who has broad Republican support, is expected to be confirmed by the Senate in time for Powell’s term expiration on May 15. If confirmed, Warsh has signaled significant policy changes, including abolishing the "dot plot" of interest rate projections and reevaluating the Fed’s forward guidance framework. These changes could fundamentally alter the market’s pricing mechanisms for stocks, bonds, and currencies. Although the criminal case against Powell is closed, uncertainty remains as he retains his board seat until 2028. President Trump has not fully endorsed Powell, citing an ongoing review of Fed renovation spending. Warsh’s potential reforms target the communication tools developed post-2008, which have become foundational to global asset pricing.

marsbit33 min fa

Key Lawmaker 'Relents', Wash's Biggest Obstacle to Assuming Fed Chair on May 15 Cleared

marsbit33 min fa

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit47 min fa

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit47 min fa

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

Prediction markets face a fundamental contradiction: they rely on insider trading to generate accurate prices, yet this same activity erodes public trust and threatens their survival. Recent scandals, such as a U.S. special forces member making $400,000 on Polymarket using classified information about a raid, highlight the severity of the issue. While platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi market themselves as venues where "everyone is an expert" and encourage informed trading, they also enforce policies against illegal insider trading. The core dilemma is that these markets depend on informed insiders for price efficiency but require uninformed retail participants to provide liquidity. If insider trading is too rampant, retail traders leave, perceiving the market as unfair. If restrictions are too strict, valuable information flow dries up, reducing the market’s predictive utility. The challenge is finding a balance that maintains both accuracy and perceived fairness—a task complicated by regulatory pressures and recurring scandals.

marsbit53 min fa

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

marsbit53 min fa

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit1 h fa

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures