Humanity Loses $31 Million in Attack, Token Price Plummets 90% Due to a Single Private Key

marsbitPubblicato 2026-06-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-09

Introduzione

On June 9th, the digital identity project Humanity Protocol suffered a major security breach resulting in over $31 million in losses. According to on-chain analyst Specter, hundreds of wallets holding the project's H token were drained. The attack was confirmed by founder Terence Kwok to be caused by the compromise of a foundation member's private key. As a precaution, users are advised to avoid interacting with Humanity's cross-chain bridge or liquidity pools. The incident caused the H token price to crash over 90%, from around $0.70 to a low of $0.052, wiping its market cap from $2 billion to approximately $35.7 million. The attacker allegedly minted 100 million new H tokens and is selling them for BNB. This breach adds to existing controversies surrounding Humanity Protocol. Founded in 2024, it aimed to verify human users via palm-print biometrics and zero-knowledge proofs. However, a leaked conversation in 2025 revealed that only about 1 million of its 9 million claimed Human IDs had completed biometric verification, suggesting 88% might be bots. Furthermore, the project has faced allegations of being a repackaged product from a Chinese access control vendor, raising privacy and authenticity concerns. Founder Terence Kwok's previous venture, Tink Labs, a hotel smartphone startup that raised $170 million, failed and entered bankruptcy in 2020 after burning through its funding. The current attack highlights the persistent critical issue of private key management in cryp...

On June 9th, according to on-chain analyst Specter's monitoring, wallets that have interacted with the digital identity project Humanity are under sustained attack.

So far, hundreds of addresses holding H tokens have been stolen, with total losses exceeding $31 million. Approximately $9 million has already been converted to ETH, and about $9.9 million remains in the form of H tokens.

Humanity founder Terence Kwok later confirmed the security incident, which involved the leak of a private key belonging to a foundation member.

As a precautionary measure, he advised users to temporarily avoid interacting with the Humanity cross-chain bridge or any liquidity pools until further safety confirmation. The team is working with security experts and exchange partners to address the issue and will continue to update the community on progress.

The H token price plummeted from around 0.7 USDT to a low of 0.052 USDT, a drop of over 90% in 24 hours. As of the time of writing, H is trading at 0.1368301 USDT, with its market capitalization falling from around $2 billion to approximately $35.7 million.

As of 11:00 on June 9th, the attacker allegedly newly minted 100 million Humanity Protocol H tokens and is dumping them in exchange for BNB.

A Project That Hasn't Truly "Proven Humanity"

Humanity Protocol was founded in 2024, positioning itself as a decentralized digital identity network. Its core selling point is verifying users as real humans using palm print biometrics and zero-knowledge proofs. The project is built on Polygon CDK (zkEVM), claiming to solve issues like Sybil attacks, fake accounts, and AI-generated identities without exposing personal information.

This narrative attracted significant capital attention in 2024. Humanity Protocol completed two rounds of funding totaling $50 million. A $30 million seed round valued the project at $1 billion, with investors including Kingsway Capital, Animoca Brands, Blockchain.com, and Shima Capital, among others.

In January 2025, a round led by Pantera Capital and Jump Crypto raised $20 million, increasing the valuation to $1.1 billion.

The Humanity Foundation also gathered many prominent figures, led by Animoca Brands Chairman Yat Siu. Co-founders include Mario Nawfal, founder of the international blockchain consulting firm, and Yeewai Chong, a senior investment expert from Morgan Stanley and Ortus Capital.

On June 25, 2025, the H token launched via a Fairdrop mechanism, touted as the first token distribution in Web 3.0 history exclusively for verified real humans. However, two days after launch, DL News reported leaked conversations from the founder. Kwok admitted in the dialogue that out of the 9 million Human IDs created on the network, only about 1 million had completed biometric verification, meaning up to 88% of users could be bots.

Furthermore, according to claims by users like SCoin(@ LianFang _) and AB Kuai . Dong(@_FOR AB) on platform X, Humanity Protocol (H) might be a "re-packaged Chinese project," with its app's code asset library still containing images from the Shenzhen access control manufacturer Zhang Teng Information, raising authenticity doubts. Netizens alleged that its social media hype was largely orchestrated by the project's own sock puppet accounts, with actual user engagement being questionable.

AB Kuai.Dong warned that those who previously did verification with Humanity should be careful. Zhang Teng Information is backed by a Shanghai outsourcing company specializing in full-service identity recognition outsourcing. Additionally, whistleblower SCoin claimed the project collected large amounts of user palm print information, raising privacy and security concerns.

This was fatal for a project whose core value proposition is "proving humanity." The H token fell over 61% within two days of launch, from around $0.05 to a low of $0.018.

The Founder's Previous Unicorn Burned Through $170 Million

Terence Kwok's personal history adds a risk footnote to this project. In 2012, 20-year-old Terence Kwok dropped out of the University of Chicago. After receiving a $900 roaming bill during a trip, he founded Tink Labs, which provided free smartphones (branded Handy) in hotel rooms for guests to use abroad to avoid high roaming fees.

This concept once captivated the capital market. Tink Labs raised $170 million in total from Foxconn, SoftBank, Innovation Works, and the founder of Meitu, reaching a valuation of $1.5 billion and becoming Hong Kong's first unicorn. At its peak, Handy devices covered 600,000 hotel rooms across 82 countries.

However, Kwok's aggressive expansion strategy soon met reality. Global roaming fees continued to fall, hotels were unwilling to pay for Handy devices, and the company began losing money from 2017. According to the Financial Times, after discovering that Tink Labs might have diverted funds from its Japanese joint venture to other loss-making markets, SoftBank cut off funding for the key project.

In July 2019, over 100 employees in European, Middle Eastern, and African offices did not receive their salaries. Laid-off employees smeared cake on the walls and floors as they left the Oxford office. On August 1st, Tink Labs officially shut down, entering bankruptcy liquidation in January 2020. A former HR executive told the FT that Kwok only cared about "making money," and the entire $170 million investment was lost.

Six years later, Kwok returned to the market with Humanity Protocol, securing a unicorn valuation once again from Pantera Capital and Jump Crypto.

Private Key Management: An Old Problem, A New Price

From the current information, this attack does not involve smart contract vulnerabilities or protocol-level security flaws. The attacker obtained a private key from a foundation member, representing a failure of the most traditional security management.

The security situation in the crypto industry was already severe in 2026. According to CCN statistics, losses from DeFi hacks in the first four months of 2026 exceeded $1 billion, with most stolen funds still unrecovered. The $286 million attack on Drift Protocol on April 1st was the single largest event this year.

Attackers are increasingly targeting validators, RPC nodes, and governance systems, not just smart contract vulnerabilities. However, private key leaks remain one of the most devastating attack types, as they bypass all on-chain security mechanisms and directly obtain asset control.

For a project already burdened with the controversy of 88% bot users and a token down over 90% from its high, a $31 million private key leak could be the final blow to trust.

As of the time of writing, Kwok stated in a declaration that the team is working with security experts and exchange partners, but did not mention any user compensation plan or explain why the foundation member's private key lacked basic protections like multi-signature or hardware isolation.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main cause of the $31 million hack in the Humanity project according to the article?

AThe hack was caused by the compromise of a private key belonging to a foundation member, leading to unauthorized access and asset theft, not a smart contract vulnerability.

QHow did the price of the H token react immediately after the security incident?

AThe price of the H token plummeted from around $0.7 USDT to a low of $0.052 USDT, representing a drop of over 90% within 24 hours.

QWhat was a major controversy surrounding the Humanity Protocol's user verification prior to this hack?

AA leaked conversation revealed that only about 1 million out of 9 million created Human IDs had completed biometric verification, suggesting that up to 88% of the users might have been bots.

QWhat is the background of Humanity founder Terence Kwok's previous venture, Tink Labs?

ATerence Kwok's previous venture, Tink Labs (which provided Handy smartphones in hotel rooms), raised $170 million and reached a $1.5 billion valuation before collapsing in 2019, with the investment reportedly completely lost.

QWhat action did the attacker reportedly take with the stolen assets, and what precaution did the founder advise users to take?

AThe attacker reportedly converted about $9 million into ETH and was selling newly minted tokens for BNB. The founder advised users to temporarily avoid interacting with the Humanity cross-chain bridge or any liquidity pools until safety is confirmed.

Letture associate

WeChat Agent Issues a 'Heroic Summons,' Half of the Internet Responds

WeChat AI Agent is on the horizon. The WeChat Open Platform has issued a guide for developers, offering them ways to integrate into the WeChat AI ecosystem. This will enable mini-programs to be discovered and invoked by the AI. Meituan has already announced its integration, allowing users to access services like food delivery through WeChat AI. Other platforms like Ctrip and Tongcheng have followed suit. Furthermore, WeChat is collaborating with major smartphone manufacturers to enable their native AI assistants to perform actions within WeChat, such as initiating calls or sending messages, through a controlled protocol called Agent-to-Agent (A2A). Reports indicate the WeChat AI Agent will be accessible by swiping right on the main interface. It aims to understand user intent within the rich context of chats, groups, and past interactions, then automatically call upon relevant mini-programs to complete tasks like ordering coffee or booking restaurants. This positions it as a potential "super app" with direct access to WeChat's vast ecosystem of services, social connections, and payment systems. Technically, this is a complex endeavor. It requires advanced natural language understanding, a "world model" to predict interactions within mini-programs (UI-Oceanus), multi-model orchestration for cost efficiency, and careful coordination with millions of third-party service providers. Tencent's development follows a "Co-Design" approach, where product teams and the Hunyuan model team collaborate closely, allowing capabilities honed in other AI products (like Yuanbao for chat, ima for search, WorkBuddy for office tasks) to be transferred to the WeChat Agent. Tencent is strategically opting for the A2A protocol over GUI-based automation (which it has blocked in the past), maintaining control over its ecosystem. To manage the immense scale and cost of serving 1.4 billion monthly active users, Tencent is deepening its ties with DeepSeek, known for its cost-effective training, to secure a low-cost inference backbone. The ultimate goal is to solve practical, everyday problems for users within the WeChat ecosystem, moving beyond technical benchmarks to deliver real utility, which Tencent sees as the key to winning in the long-term AI game.

marsbit43 min fa

WeChat Agent Issues a 'Heroic Summons,' Half of the Internet Responds

marsbit43 min fa

MicroStrategy Will Not Die in This Downturn: Reflexivity, STRC Anchoring Back to Par, and the Self-Rescue Logic of "Sell Stock, Not Bitcoin"

This article analyzes the recent sharp decline in Bitcoin and MicroStrategy (MSTR), framing it as a targeted "reflexivity" attack. The trigger was MSTR using its cash reserves to buy back convertible notes, raising market concerns about a liquidity crisis. The playbook follows George Soros's principle: market expectations can shape reality. Fears that MSTR might be forced to sell BTC caused panic selling, lowering BTC's price and worsening MSTR's financial ratios, thus reinforcing the negative narrative. The author argues that MSTR's Structured Convertible (STRC), while falling in price, is a floating-rate security that will eventually return to par value (100). The price drop reflects the market demanding a higher yield due to perceived risk, but as a floating-rate instrument, its coupon can adjust, naturally pulling the price back to par over time. This is crucial for MSTR's continued ability to raise funds. The core thesis is that MSTR's best move to counter the attack is to **issue new equity (sell shares)**, not sell its Bitcoin holdings. While selling BTC would solve the immediate cash crunch, it would destroy the company's core investment thesis and premium. It would dilute the BTC per share, likely erase the market premium over its net asset value (mNAV > 1), and worsen its debt-to-asset ratio. Issuing shares while mNAV is high (e.g., 1.25x) allows MSTR to raise cash for reserves without harming shareholder value or the "perpetual accumulation" narrative. It improves the debt ratio and reassures STRC holders, breaking the negative reflexivity cycle. In conclusion, while MSTR could survive this episode even by selling BTC, doing so would fundamentally alter its investment proposition and weaken it for future cycles. The optimal, value-preserving strategy is to sell equity to rebuild reserves and maintain the long-term growth flywheel.

marsbit1 h fa

MicroStrategy Will Not Die in This Downturn: Reflexivity, STRC Anchoring Back to Par, and the Self-Rescue Logic of "Sell Stock, Not Bitcoin"

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片