How privacy narrative sparked ZCash’s rally — And what it needs now

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-17

Introduzione

ZCash (ZEC) experienced significant price volatility, rallying past $300 recently before retreating below that key psychological level. This movement was influenced by Bitcoin's price action, with ZEC bulls initially showing strength but facing selling pressure from broader market weakness. The rally, which began in late 2025, was primarily fueled by a growing narrative around privacy coins. This led to a substantial increase in on-chain activity, including a rise in both regular and shielded transactions. Shielded transactions, which encrypt sender, receiver, and amount details, saw their share jump to over 26% during peak months. Furthermore, the amount of ZEC held in privacy-preserving pools grew dramatically from 11.25% of the circulating supply in late 2024 to over 30% a year later. This fundamental shift in user behavior and asset holding, combined with the post-halving narrative, drove increased adoption and investor appeal for ZEC network.

ZCash experienced high volatility on the price charts in recent weeks.

AMBCrypto reported that the defense of the $187 level was a crucial development. This level was an important retracement support level on the weekly timeframe.

Zooming in, the past few days’ trading saw ZEC rally beyond $300.

Following Bitcoin’s [BTC] rejection at $$70.9k on Sunday, the 15th of February, ZEC has slipped back below the $300 psychological support, as well as the 4-hour timeframe’s imbalance at this area.

It was expected that ZCash [ZEC] bulls had the short-term strength to drive prices to $360, but at the same time, AMBCrypto had warned in an earlier report that Bitcoin [BTC] weakness could see selling pressure on ZEC.

The short and long-term price situation has been laid out thus far.

The Spot selling pressure remained prevalent, as the Spot Taker CVD showed with its taker sell-dominant reading.

But why did ZCash begin its immense rally in September 2025? What conditions need to align for ZEC bulls to repeat the feat?

A closer look at the ZCash onchain trends

The privacy coin narrative seized greater and greater mindshare beginning in August last year. It grew wildly popular in October. This saw an increased total transfer, as the unshielded transactions data above showed.

It also increased privacy-focused transactions, as the shielded stats show.

Shielded transactions encrypt transaction details such as sender, receiver, and amount, using zero-knowledge proofs.

The percentage of shielded transactions remained at around 14.5%-19.6% between April and July 2025. It reached local zeniths of 26.3% and 26.7% in August and October, respectively.

Combined with the growing privacy narrative and increased ZEC usage, the percentage increase might appear small. However, it still represents a vast swathe of users flocking to the network.

Interestingly, the shielded supply, or the ZEC in the privacy-preserving Sapling and Orchard pools, was at 3.2 million in June 2025. By November, it had grown to 5 million, where it remained at the time of writing.

Like BTC, ZEC also has a fixed max supply of 21 million. Hence, 5 million represents 30.24% of the circulating supply, a dramatic growth from November 2024, when the figure was 11.25%.

It is likely that the 2024 halving and the narrative shift, followed by the sizeable increase in shielded usage, are the only fundamental changes to ZCash over the past year. Spot ETF offeringscould also change the landscape.

Final Summary

ZCash experienced a massive shift in optics last year, but its use case remained the same, while user and investor appeal soared.
In a way, ZCash was a lot like Bitcoin, which has become easier to use (example, Lightning Network) and invest in (spot ETFs) but remained fundamentally the same.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the key price level that ZCash defended on the weekly timeframe, as reported by AMBCrypto?

AThe key price level that ZCash defended was the $187 level, which was an important retracement support.

QAccording to the article, what two major factors are the fundamental changes for ZCash over the past year?

AThe two major fundamental changes were the 2024 halving combined with a narrative shift, followed by a sizeable increase in shielded usage.

QWhat percentage of ZCash's circulating supply was in shielded pools as of the time of writing, and how does this compare to November 2024?

AAs of the time of writing, 30.24% of the circulating supply was in shielded pools, a dramatic growth from 11.25% in November 2024.

QWhat on-chain metric showed that spot selling pressure remained prevalent for ZEC?

AThe Spot Taker CVD metric showed a taker sell-dominant reading, indicating that spot selling pressure was prevalent.

QThe article compares ZCash to Bitcoin. In what two ways does it say Bitcoin has become easier to use and invest in?

AThe article states that Bitcoin has become easier to use, for example with the Lightning Network, and easier to invest in with spot ETFs.

Letture associate

Bitcoin ETFs Rout Extends To June With $1.72 Billion Net Outflows In First Week

U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs extended their downturn into early June, recording net outflows of approximately $1.72 billion from June 1-5 following a poor May. This trend reflects sustained bearish sentiment, with only one day of positive net inflows in the past 15 trading sessions. BlackRock's IBIT led the withdrawals with $1.34 billion in outflows, while most other major funds also saw redemptions. Total ETF net assets fell over 20% to $75.12 billion. In parallel, Ethereum spot ETFs saw net outflows of $168 million, indicating investor caution amid macroeconomic uncertainty. Bitcoin's price hovered around $61,592 at press time.

bitcoinist4 h fa

Bitcoin ETFs Rout Extends To June With $1.72 Billion Net Outflows In First Week

bitcoinist4 h fa

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, suffered a historic collapse in price, losing over 50% of its value in 24 hours and erasing billions from its market cap. The dramatic sell-off was triggered by the disclosure of a major vulnerability in the Zcash Orchard privacy pool that had remained undetected since May 2022. A security researcher, using AI, developed a proof-of-concept to generate counterfeit ZEC. While the bug was patched by June 2, Zcash's privacy design makes it impossible to verify if any fake coins were minted before the fix, fueling market panic and uncertainty. This event highlights the trade-off between privacy and transparency. In response, Shielded Labs is exploring a network upgrade to allow supply verification. Despite the crisis, proponents argue that the discovery by world-class security researchers demonstrates the network's commitment to proactive hardening and resilience.

bitcoinist8 h fa

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

bitcoinist8 h fa

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit8 h fa

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit8 h fa

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手8 h fa

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手8 h fa

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit9 h fa

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit9 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures