Hong Kong Unveils New Rules To Allow Crypto Margin Financing And Perpetual Contracts

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-02-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-12

Introduzione

Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has introduced new rules allowing licensed virtual asset brokers to offer crypto margin financing and perpetual contracts to professional investors. Under the ASPIRe roadmap's Pillar P, eligible clients with strong credit and sufficient collateral can use Bitcoin and Ether as collateral for margin trading. The move aims to enhance market liquidity, provide risk management tools, and strengthen Hong Kong's position as a global virtual asset hub. The SFC emphasized the need for robust risk controls, as these products carry distinct risks. Executive Director Eric Yip stated that these measures are part of a broader strategy to cultivate market depth and investor confidence through regulated innovation.

Hong Kong financial authorities have announced new rules to expand the scope of product offerings, allowing the integration of crypto margin financing and perpetual contracts into the local virtual assets market.

Hong Kong Approves Crypto Margin Financing, Perps

On Wednesday, Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) unveiled a framework for licensed corporations that provide virtual asset dealing services (VA brokers) to offer virtual asset financing.

According to the SFC’s circular, the financial watchdog will permit VA brokers to extend credit to margin clients with strong credit profiles and sufficient securities collateral, under Pillar P of its Access, Safeguards, Products, Infrastructure and Relationships (ASPIRe) roadmap.

This will allow eligible margin clients to “increase their participation in VA trading, which can enhance the liquidity of Hong Kong’s VA market. At the same time, this can also facilitate the development of VA financing in a risk-controlled environment.”

Under the new guidance, only the two leading cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH), will be eligible as VA collateral. The regulator also released a high-level framework for licensed virtual asset trading platforms to offer crypto perpetual contracts to professional investors.

“Under the ASPIRe roadmap, Pillar P reflects the SFC’s commitment to expanding the scope of product offerings, including Perps. This initiative aims to deepen market liquidity, broaden risk management tools for investors, and further strengthen Hong Kong’s position as a leading global virtual asset hub,” the watchdog affirmed.

The SFC emphasized that the introduction of Perps will bring new opportunities to the market, but noted that it also carries “a range of risks that are distinct from those associated with traditional futures or spot trading of virtual assets.”

Therefore, the framework requires platform operators to have robust management measures and transparent processes governing valuation, margining, collateralization, and liquidation management.

Hong Kong Digital Landscape In ‘Defining Stage’

Speaking at Consensus Hong Kong 2026 on Wednesday, Eric Yip, SFC’s Executive Director of Intermediaries, shared his views on the watchdog’s regulatory enhancements for the next phase of Hong Kong’s crypto assets ecosystem.

Yip affirmed that Hong Kong’s crypto asset development has entered a “defining stage, shaped by the SFC’s ASPIRe roadmap that outlines a future-proof regulatory framework aimed at deepening market quality, resilience, and global competitiveness.”

He emphasized this year’s focus on liquidity, “cultivating market depth, strengthening price discovery, and building investor confidence through a strategic blend of expanded access and responsible product innovation.”

As the executive explained, the SFC is expanding the city’s crypto product suite under Pillar P while maintaining regulatory guardrails aligned with traditional financial market standards.

Notably, Yip highlighted the SFC’s greenlight of crypto margin financing, which will be anchored to the existing securities margin financing framework. He noted that it will provide clarification on the use of crypto assets as collateral, “enabling responsible leverage that supports liquidity without undermining financial stability.”

In addition, he also outlined the new high-level framework for leveraged perpetual contracts for professional investors, which sets out a principles-based model.

Discussing how to bridge innovation and regulatory clarity, he pointed to the upcoming Digital Asset Accelerator to be set up under Pillar Re, which will serve as a structured communication channel between the regulatory agency and industry innovators.

He concluded that “liquidity does not emerge organically; it must be cultivated through openness, strong governance, and a purposeful regulatory design. Through targeted access reforms, product expansion, and structured innovation support, Hong Kong is well-positioned to become a leading global digital assets centre where liquidity thrives on a foundation of integrity, resilience, and international cooperation.”

Bitcoin trades at $68,307 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Domande pertinenti

QWhat new financial products has Hong Kong's SFC approved for the virtual assets market?

AHong Kong's SFC has approved crypto margin financing and perpetual contracts for professional investors.

QWhich two specific cryptocurrencies are eligible to be used as collateral under the new margin financing rules?

AOnly Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) are eligible as virtual asset collateral under the new guidance.

QWhat is the name of the SFC's roadmap that outlines this new regulatory framework?

AThe regulatory framework is part of the SFC's ASPIRe (Access, Safeguards, Products, Infrastructure and Relationships) roadmap.

QAccording to the SFC executive, what stage has Hong Kong's crypto asset development entered?

AAccording to Eric Yip, Hong Kong's crypto asset development has entered a 'defining stage'.

QWhat is the primary goal of introducing these new products like margin financing and perpetual contracts?

AThe primary goals are to enhance market liquidity, broaden risk management tools for investors, and strengthen Hong Kong's position as a leading global virtual asset hub.

Letture associate

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

Decoding Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure: The Reality Over the past year, I've been building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, Google, and dozens of startups. A clear conclusion emerges: true, large-scale demand does not yet exist. Startups face structural challenges. Data points illustrate this gap. Stripe's Agent commerce platform has over 1,000 merchants but only single-digit transacting agents. Visa's Agent payment token requires 9-month KYC and a $250M revenue threshold, accessible only to giants like Amazon. On-chain analysis reveals actual daily Agent transaction volume is around $17k, half of which are test transactions. The article analyzes four potential markets: **1. Agent-to-Merchant (A2M):** Current AI shopping UX is often inferior to traditional e-commerce for visual, comparison-heavy purchases (clothing, electronics). Chat interfaces are a step back. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," fearing future obsolescence, not current demand. Potential exists in high-frequency, low-decision purchases (e.g., food delivery) or simplifying terrible UX (complex checkouts, non-native shoppers), but these require massive consumer distribution channels dominated by giants like DoorDash and Amazon. **2. Agent-to-API (A2A):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing for core APIs (compute, data). The argument for micro-payments via crypto for sub-dollar API calls is addressed by pre-paid balances today. The deeper issue is supplier resistance; major SaaS firms rely on enterprise contracts, not fractional cent pricing. Opportunity lies in the long tail of niche services, but this is a smaller market catering to developers, a historically low-paying group. **3. Agent-to-Agent (A2A):** This remains a theoretical long-term vision with near-zero current transaction volume. It involves unique challenges: discovery, trust, negotiation, dispute resolution. When it materializes, it will require a fundamentally new settlement infrastructure for high-speed, variable-value, multi-party transactions. It's a real long-term bet, but not the current market. **4. Agent-to-Finance (A2F):** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors incumbents with regulatory licenses, compliance infrastructure, and existing client relationships. **The Real Issue:** Why is infrastructure still being built? Incumbents can afford long-term bets, and payment companies see every problem as a nail for their payment hammer. However, payment is just one piece. The core challenge is *coordination*—orchestrating work between Agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is part of settlement, which is part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. Startups lack the infinite runway of giants and must find today's real market, which, after a year of exploration, lies outside these four categories—in an area with real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit1 h fa

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

marsbit1 h fa

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

The article "Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition" explores prediction markets as a focal point of excitement in 2025 for investors, crypto enthusiasts, and media. It traces their intellectual lineage from Friedrich Hayek's ideas on dispersed knowledge and market coordination to Robin Hanson's Logarithmic Market Scoring Rule (LMSR), which incentivizes truthful information sharing. The piece argues that a16z's significant investment in prediction market platform Kalshi (valued at $220B) transcends mere financial speculation. a16z frames prediction markets as a new form of "media" that provides "presence"—a way for individuals to actively engage with and influence world events through financial stakes, countering postmodern detachment. By wagering on outcomes, users become "super observers," and the market's aggregated probabilities gain authoritative power to define event truth and importance. The article uses media company MTS ("Monitoring The Situation") as a case study of a16z's "new media" strategy: rapidly producing high-intensity, multi-format content to "take over the timeline." However, prediction markets like Kalshi are presented as the ultimate piece in this media empire. Their real-money, crowd-sourced probabilities possess a unique "reality distortion field" and perceived objectivity, potentially swaying public opinion and granting a private company unprecedented interpretive power over reality. Ultimately, Kalshi's immense valuation is attributed not just to its exchange model, but to its role as a foundational component in a16z's envisioned new media landscape, where prediction markets define narrative and truth.

链捕手1 h fa

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片