Hong Kong Proposes New Rules To Allow Crypto Investments For Insurers – Report

bitcoinistPubblicato 2025-12-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-23

Introduzione

Hong Kong's Insurance Authority has proposed new rules to allow insurers to invest in cryptocurrencies and stablecoins, as part of the city's broader strategy to become a global digital asset hub. The proposal, subject to public consultation from February to April 2026, would impose a 100% risk charge on crypto assets, requiring insurers to hold reserves equal to their crypto investments. Stablecoins would be treated differently, with risk charges based on the fiat currency they are pegged to. The move aims to support the insurance industry and economic development. Separately, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority is expected to issue its first stablecoin licenses in early 2026, though mainland China's strict stance against stablecoins may complicate applications involving Chinese institutions or the yuan.

Hong Kong is reportedly exploring new rules that would allow insurance companies to invest in cryptocurrencies and the infrastructure sector as part of its efforts to become a leading hub for digital assets and support broader economic development.

Hong Kong Eyes Crypto Investments For Insurers

On Monday, Bloomberg reported that the Hong Kong Insurance Authority has proposed a set of new rules that could channel insurance capital into digital assets, including cryptocurrencies and stablecoins.

Hong Kong financial authorities have been actively working to develop a comprehensive framework that supports the expansion of the digital assets industry, part of its strategy to become a leading crypto hub in the world.

According to the December 4 presentation reviewed by Bloomberg, the insurance regulator would impose a 100% risk charge on crypto assets, requiring insurers to hold reserves equal to the value of their crypto investments.

Meanwhile, stablecoin investments would be approached differently under the new proposal, with risk charges based on the fiat currency the Hong Kong-regulated token is pegged to.

The Insurance Authority proposal, which could still change in the coming months, will reportedly be open for public consultation from February through April 2026, followed by legislative submissions.

The regulator told Bloomberg that it initiated the review of the risk-based capital regime this year with the main goal of supporting the insurance industry and broader economic development.

Notably, the insurance authority website states that there were 158 authorized insurers in Hong Kong as of June 2025. Moreover, the total gross premiums of the Hong Kong insurance industry were HK$635 billion, worth approximately $82 billion, in 2024.

“We are at the stage of gauging industry feedback and will also put the proposals for public consultation in due course,” a spokesperson for the regulator told the news media outlet.

The proposed insurer framework also addresses new infrastructure rules as the city seeks new growth. The regulator is reportedly planning capital incentives for investments in Hong Kong or on the mainland, as well as for projects listed or issued in the financial hub.

HK’s Stablecoin Landscape

As Bloomberg noted, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is expected to grant the first batch of stablecoin issuer licenses at the start of 2026. However, some industry players believe that the regulator’s timeline could be delayed.

As reported by Bitcoinist, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) and other top financial regulators recently affirmed that stablecoins do not qualify as legal tender in the mainland, as they don’t meet regulatory requirements and risk of being used for illegal activities.

Following the pronouncement, multiple analysts suggested that the PBOC’s recent declarations not only sank hopes that Beijing might have softened its stance on cryptocurrencies but also would affect Hong Kong’s efforts to become a hub for the stablecoin industry.

Earlier this year, the HKMA enacted the Stablecoins Ordinance, which directs any individual or entity seeking to issue a fiat-referenced stablecoin (FRS) in Hong Kong, or any Hong Kong Dollar-pegged token, to obtain a license from the regulator.

Multiple companies have applied for the license, with more than 30 applications filed this year, according to local news outlets. The list of applicants includes logistics technology firm Reitar Logtech and the overseas arm of Chinese mainland financial technology giant Ant Group.

According to the founding director of the Law, Innovation, Technology and Entrepreneurship Lab at the University of Hong Kong’s Faculty of Law, Brian Tang, Beijing’s stance means that applicants for Hong Kong’s stablecoin licenses would need to reconsider if the application submitted to the HKMA touches mainland China issuers and users.

A spokesperson stated that the HKMA was reviewing the applications and aimed to begin with a reduced number of licenses. However, they noted that even if Hong Kong proceeds with the original approval schedule, projects that involve the yuan or mainland Chinese institutions would likely be delayed.

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $90,040 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main purpose of Hong Kong's proposed new rules for insurance companies?

AThe main purpose is to allow insurance companies to invest in cryptocurrencies and the infrastructure sector as part of Hong Kong's strategy to become a leading hub for digital assets and support broader economic development.

QWhat specific risk charge would be imposed on crypto assets under the proposed rules?

AA 100% risk charge would be imposed, requiring insurers to hold reserves equal to the full value of their crypto investments.

QHow will the risk charge for stablecoin investments be determined according to the proposal?

AThe risk charge for stablecoins will be based on the fiat currency that the Hong Kong-regulated token is pegged to.

QWhen is the Hong Kong Insurance Authority's proposal expected to be open for public consultation?

AThe proposal is expected to be open for public consultation from February through April 2026.

QWhat potential impact did analysts suggest the PBOC's declaration on stablecoins would have on Hong Kong?

AAnalysts suggested that the PBOC's declaration, which states stablecoins are not legal tender, would affect Hong Kong's efforts to become a hub for the stablecoin industry and means license applicants must reconsider if their application involves mainland China issuers and users.

Letture associate

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit8 h fa

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit8 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit9 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit9 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit10 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit10 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片