HashKey Lists XAUt, Marking First Gold Token Trading on a Compliant Exchange in Hong Kong

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-15Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-15

Introduzione

HashKey Exchange, the largest licensed digital asset exchange in Hong Kong and a subsidiary of HashKey Holdings Limited (3887.HK), has officially listed Tether Gold (XAUt). Professional investors can trade XAUt through its over-the-counter (OTC) Marketplace. This marks the first time a licensed exchange in Hong Kong offers compliant trading of gold tokens. Each XAUt token represents one troy ounce of a physical gold bar that meets the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) delivery standard. By holding XAUt, users gain exposure to physical gold without the logistical challenges of storage and transfer. The introduction of XAUt allows professional investors to hedge against market volatility by allocating part of their portfolio to gold without leaving the HashKey platform. This move integrates traditional safe-haven assets into the digital asset ecosystem, providing a diversified and compliant investment option and bridging traditional and digital finance. Michelle Cheng, Director of HashKey Exchange, stated that the listing addresses inefficiencies in traditional gold allocation, enabling users to manage gold as easily as other digital assets. This is a concrete step toward improving the efficiency of real-world asset (RWA) circulation within a regulated digital environment.

HashKey Exchange, the largest* licensed digital asset trading platform in Hong Kong under listed company HashKey Holdings Limited (3887.HK), has officially listed Tether Gold (XAUt). Professional investors can trade it via the over-the-counter (OTC) bulk trading Marketplace interface. This move signifies the first compliant trading of gold, a traditional safe-haven asset, on a licensed exchange in Hong Kong.

Tether Gold (XAUt) is a gold-backed product issued by Tether, with each XAUt token representing one troy ounce of a gold bar that meets the delivery standards of the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). By holding XAUt, users can own gold in the form of an on-chain digital token, eliminating the inconveniences associated with the delivery, storage, and transfer of physical gold.

During periods of market volatility, professional investors often need to allocate safe-haven assets to hedge risks. With the listing of XAUt on HashKey Exchange, investors can directly allocate their digital assets to gold through HashKey's OTC mechanism without switching platforms, facilitating asset allocation.

By introducing XAUt, HashKey Exchange has not only incorporated gold, a traditional safe-haven asset, into the digital asset trading ecosystem for the first time, providing investors with diversified and compliant asset allocation options, but it has also taken a key step in bridging traditional finance and digital finance.

Michelle Cheng, Director of HashKey Exchange, stated: "In traditional investment environments, gold often requires separate accounts or offline channels for allocation, making it difficult to adjust promptly during market fluctuations. We aim to promote the more efficient circulation of Real World Assets (RWA), represented by gold, in the digital environment. With the listing of XAUt, users can buy, sell, and convert gold just like managing other digital assets. This is a concrete implementation of our efforts to address the challenges of gold allocation within a compliant framework."

About HashKey Exchange

HashKey Exchange is a digital asset exchange under listed company HashKey Holdings Limited (3887.HK), committed to setting new benchmarks for virtual asset exchanges in terms of compliance, fund security, and platform safety. Hash Blockchain Limited (HashKey Exchange) is one of the first licensed retail virtual asset exchanges in Hong Kong. It has obtained approval from the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong to hold licenses for Type 1 (dealing in securities) and Type 7 (providing automated trading services) under the Securities and Futures Ordinance, as well as a license to operate a virtual asset trading platform under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance, enabling it to operate a virtual asset trading platform in compliance with regulations. HashKey Exchange has obtained ISO 27001 (information security) and ISO 27701 (data privacy) management system certifications. To comply with laws and regulations, HashKey Exchange does not provide services to users in Mainland China, the United States, and certain other jurisdictions.

HashKey Exchange News Release and Advertising Standard Terms and Disclaimer

* As of January 15, 2026, HashKey Exchange is ranked 17th on CoinGecko, making it the highest-ranked licensed virtual asset exchange in Hong Kong.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is XAUt and what does each token represent?

AXAUt is a gold-backed token issued by Tether. Each XAUt token represents ownership of one troy ounce of a physical gold bar that meets the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) Good Delivery standards.

QOn which exchange was XAUt officially listed, and what is significant about this listing?

AXAUt was officially listed on HashKey Exchange. This is significant because it marks the first time a gold token is available for compliant trading on a licensed exchange in Hong Kong.

QHow can professional investors trade XAUt on HashKey Exchange?

AProfessional investors can trade XAUt through the over-the-counter (OTC) bulk trading Marketplace interface on HashKey Exchange.

QAccording to HashKey Exchange Director Michelle Cheng, what problem does the listing of XAUt help solve?

AAccording to Michelle Cheng, the listing of XAUt helps solve the problem of the difficulty in调度 (scheduling/allocating) gold in a timely manner during market volatility by allowing users to buy, sell, and convert gold just like managing other digital assets within a compliant system.

QWhat type of licenses does HashKey Exchange hold from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC)?

AHashKey Exchange holds a Type 1 (dealing in securities) license and a Type 7 (providing automated trading services) license under the Securities and Futures Ordinance, as well as a license to operate a virtual asset trading platform under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance.

Letture associate

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit4 h fa

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit4 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手4 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手4 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit6 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit6 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手8 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手8 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit9 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit9 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片