HashKey IPO Oversubscribed 300 Times, Investors Betting on Its Era Positioning

marsbitPubblicato 2025-12-15Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-15

Introduzione

HashKey, known as "Hong Kong's first licensed crypto asset stock" (Stock Code: 03887), concluded its IPO subscription on December 12, with its official listing scheduled for December 17. Despite concerns over continued significant financial losses—reporting an adjusted net loss of approximately HK$1.57 billion from 2022 to 2024—the public offering was oversubscribed by 301.6x, raising HK$506 billion in margin financing against an initial target of HK$1.67 billion. The company attributes its losses to high upfront investments in compliance, technology development, and ecosystem expansion, drawing parallels to Coinbase’s early growth trajectory. HashKey operates multiple business segments, including regulated exchange services (HashKey Exchange and HashKey Global), blockchain infrastructure (HashKey Chain), asset management (HashKey Capital), OTC services, and tokenization solutions. Its strategic value lies in being a bridge between traditional finance and Web3, positioning itself as a compliant gateway for institutional entry into Asian crypto markets. With backing from cornerstone investors like UBS, Fidelity, and CDH Investments, HashKey aims to strengthen Hong Kong’s ambition to become a "global virtual asset hub." While skeptics point to its financials and perceived inefficiencies, investor enthusiasm reflects confidence in HashKey’s regulatory compliance, institutional leadership in Asia, and its role in regional digital finance infrastructure. The IPO is seen less as...

Author: momo, ChainCatcher

"Hong Kong's first crypto asset stock" HashKey (stock code: 03887) officially ended its share offering at noon on December 12 and is scheduled to be listed on December 17.

Since passing the Hong Kong Stock Exchange hearing and the public release of its prospectus, the market has shown mixed reactions and voices regarding HashKey's IPO.

On one hand, HashKey's continuous huge losses and high-cost operating structure have raised concerns about its financial health, and its platform token HSK has been criticized as inefficient and sacrificing community interests.

On the other hand, the HashKey IPO subscription market has been continuously hot. The latest data at noon on the 12th, when the offering officially ended, showed that the total subscription funds lent through brokerage channels (margin financing) reached HKD 50.6 billion. Based on the public offering fundraising amount of HKD 167 million (approximately HKD 170 million), it was oversubscribed by 301.6 times.

Additionally, HashKey's IPO has introduced 9 well-known cornerstone investors, including UBS, Fidelity Fund, and CDH Investments, who collectively subscribed to approximately HKD 590 million in shares.

Despite constant pessimism, investors are still betting with real money on HashKey's scarcity value as "Hong Kong's major licensed compliant platform." As a slice of Hong Kong's virtual asset market development, HashKey's hot subscription also reflects the market's policy sentiment, namely the continued optimism towards Hong Kong's acceleration in building a "global virtual asset center."

High Investment Period ≠ Poor Management

The business logic that pessimists should understand:High investment period ≠ Poor management.According to the prospectus, from 2022 to 2024, HashKey accumulated an adjusted net loss of approximately HKD 1.57 billion; the loss in 2024 nearly doubled year-on-year to HKD 1.19 billion.

HashKey explained in its prospectus that in 2022, the trading platform was still in its early development stage, contributing limited revenue, and the fair value loss of digital assets also affected the 2022 financial performance. As the trading system, compliance framework, and institutional client access process were gradually improved, the company fully launched its business in 2023. In 2024, revenue from trade facilitation services reached HKD 518 million, compared to a loss of HKD 15 million in 2022, reflecting strong business expansion momentum and the effectiveness of early strategic investments.

Since 2022, HashKey has been in a period of high investment, and continuous losses are not due to poor management. Early continuous losses are actually common in platform-based companies. For example, Amazon had nearly 20 years of losses. When Amazon went public, Bezos stated in his open letter to shareholders that "it's all about the long term."

Furthermore,high investment in compliant financial infrastructure is almost inevitable in the early development stage.. For example, Coinbase, which is strategically similar to HashKey. Coinbase firmly took the compliance path from its establishment in 2012. Since 2013, it has successively obtained money transmission licenses in 46 U.S. states/regions and can operate legally in all 50 states. It is one of the few exchanges that have obtained various state licenses, FinCEN registration, and a New York trust license in the United States, spending huge amounts on compliance every year. Coinbase's investment far exceeded its revenue for many years before going public. Although it accumulated losses of approximately USD 5-6 million before its IPO, it was still accepted by Wall Street.

For large institutions and mainstream users, Coinbase is often the first or even the only choice. In the United States, subject to regulatory restrictions, many traditional funds can only use licensed trading platforms. Coinbase thus gains a natural market share, and the barriers formed by its brand and compliance are difficult for latecomers to quickly and cost-effectively replicate.

For companies like Coinbase and HashKey, extremely high security levels, risk control systems, compliance systems, and custody capabilities are required, and a large amount of fixed costs must be invested in advance.

Where did HashKey's high investment go?

Besides compliance costs, a large portion of HashKey's high investment went into technology and R&D. In 2024, HashKey's R&D expenditure reached HKD 580 million, accounting for 77.2% of its revenue.This includes developing core trading systems, security risk control systems, self-developed blockchain (HashKey Chain), and cutting-edge technologies like RWA (Real World Asset) tokenization.

Specifically, HashKey's service system includes asset custody, OTC services, institutional services, HashKey Chain public chain, RWA issuance and management, etc. Its ecological landscape can be roughly summarized as:

Trading layer (HashKey Exchange, HashKey Global): Provides compliant deposit and withdrawal channels for retail and institutions, with cumulative trading volume exceeding HKD 1.3 trillion, attracting institutional funds, and holding a 75% market share in Hong Kong.
Chain layer (HashKey Chain): A compliant L2 public chain focused on RWA tokenization and stablecoin issuance, bridging on-chain and off-chain, with the ecological HSK as a governance token providing continuous incentives for the on-chain ecosystem.
Asset management layer (HashKey Capital): On one hand, custody services (Custody), with assets under management exceeding HKD 8 billion. This year, it also launched the DAT (Digital Asset Treasury) ecological fund, with an initial fundraising scale of over USD 500 million, focusing on initiating and participating in the ETH and BTC ecosystems.Additionally, HashKey Capital, as a venture capital department, makes early ecological investments, with a portfolio covering over 600 global projects.

Furthermore, HashKey's ecological landscape also includes HashKey OTC, which provides compliant digital asset over-the-counter trading services, Web3 infrastructure provider HashKey Cloud, and tokenization service agency HashKey Tokenisation.

This IPO aims to further improve the "compliant ecological closed loop of Hong Kong's virtual asset market" and provide Asia with a "scarce entry point for compliant crypto asset services."

HashKey's Positioning Value: Based in Hong Kong, Radiating to Asia

HashKey's core value has long surpassed that of a "compliant exchange" itself. It plays a strategic interface role in the next round of financial system upgrades in Hong Kong and even across Asia.

First is its uniqueEast-West channel value. Hong Kong, as a bridge between Eastern and Western financial systems, has a mature regulatory system, international financial infrastructure, and long-formed institutional synergies with the Chinese mainland market. HashKey plays the role of a "bridge between traditional finance and the Web3 world." For international institutions, it is a compliant entry point into the Chinese and Asian markets.

Second is itsleadership in the institutional market. Based on 2024 trading volume, HashKey is the largest regional onshore platform in Asia. Beyond trading business, based on staked assets, HashKey is also the largest on-chain service provider in Asia and the largest digital asset management institution based on assets under management.

Crypto assets are transforming from speculative products into corporate financial tools, a huge directional change globally.

As the "Asian version of Coinbase," in the process of Asian institutions accelerating their move on-chain, HashKey has almost become the only standard solution that can be adopted currently. Hong Kong's licensing system has extremely high thresholds, with all aspects from governance, risk control, custody to anti-money laundering接近 international financial standards. This regulatory intensity directly forms a quasi-monopoly barrier. Against the backdrop of the relatively低迷 Asian crypto entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystem, HashKey has事实上 become the ceiling for Asian institutional business.

As Hong Kong's first crypto stock, HashKey's positioning value has surpassed its business value.

HashKey恰好 stands at the风口 of Hong Kong's building of a "global virtual asset center" and the intersection of China and the West, traditional finance and virtual assets. Asian regulation and capital markets need a Coinbase-level sample. HashKey's listing is a "value pricing" of future Web3 infrastructure by the regional market. HashKey's IPO journey further reflects the grand narrative of how Asia defines its own rules, attracts global capital, and masters development initiative in the new financial era.

Therefore, despite the dismal financial situation in the prospectus, HashKey's IPO can still be oversubscribed by over 200 times,核心 is paying for its positioning value. Some investors even said that for an上市 of era symbol level, whether it breaks issue price or makes money is not that important; participating in the subscription is more like paying a few thousand dollars for the observation cost at a historical node.

Conclusion: During the trough, don't easily唱空 the Asian crypto ecosystem

When examining HashKey's IPO, simply focusing on the loss numbers很容易 overlook the larger structural logic behind it. HashKey is not a short-cycle platform that relies on trading volume for profits but is building Asia's next-generation digital financial foundation in a heavy-asset, slow-variable way.

Its positioning value in Hong Kong and the Asian financial system is far higher than its current business value. This is why, despite constant loss controversies, criticism of its platform token, and overwhelming质疑, HashKey's IPO was still oversubscribed by hundreds of times. Capital is not unable to understand its financial reports but chooses to bet with real money on the era position it occupies. HashKey is standing at this intersection.

Although not perfect, HashKey is still very scarce for the entire Asian crypto ecosystem.

Asia's crypto entrepreneurship and technological innovation ecosystem is in a trough, lacking high-quality, globally competitive fintech infrastructure companies locally. If even a company like HashKey, which is building compliance path, infrastructure, and institutional interfaces, is唱空, then it is essentially唱空 the ceiling of the entire Asian institutional business, which is毫无 beneficial to industry development.

Hong Kong is still "crossing the river by feeling the stones" in the field of virtual assets and Web3. As the龙头 in this experimental field, the market might as well have more patience and less唱衰. Perhaps we are only one step away from the next爆发 window.

Crypto di tendenza

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the significance of HashKey's IPO being oversubscribed by 300 times?

AThe 300 times oversubscription of HashKey's IPO reflects strong investor confidence in its strategic positioning as a licensed and compliant platform in Hong Kong, as well as optimism about Hong Kong's development as a global virtual asset hub.

QWhy has HashKey been experiencing significant financial losses despite its high IPO demand?

AHashKey's losses are attributed to its high investment phase, including costs related to compliance, technology development, and infrastructure building, which are common for platform-based companies in their early stages, similar to companies like Amazon and Coinbase.

QWhat are the key areas where HashKey has focused its high investments?

AHashKey has invested heavily in compliance costs, technology and R&D, including developing core trading systems, security risk controls, its proprietary blockchain (HashKey Chain), and real-world asset (RWA) tokenization.

QHow does HashKey position itself in the Asian market, and what is its core value proposition?

AHashKey positions itself as a bridge between traditional finance and Web3 in Asia, offering compliant crypto asset services. It serves as a strategic gateway for international institutions entering the Asian market and holds leadership in institutional services in the region.

QWhat is the broader implication of HashKey's IPO for Asia's crypto ecosystem?

AHashKey's IPO represents a milestone in Asia's crypto ecosystem, signaling the region's commitment to building a regulated virtual asset infrastructure. Its success is seen as a vote of confidence in Asia's potential to become a key player in the global digital finance landscape.

Letture associate

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit4 h fa

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit4 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手4 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手4 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit7 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit7 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手8 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手8 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit9 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit9 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ERA

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Caldera (ERA) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente CalderaERA.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Caldera (ERA)Dopo aver acquistato Caldera (ERA), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Caldera (ERA)Scambia facilmente Caldera (ERA) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

357 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.07.17Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ERA ERA sono presentate come di seguito.