HashKey IPO Oversubscribed 300 Times, Investors Betting on Its Era Positioning

marsbitPubblicato 2025-12-15Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-15

Introduzione

HashKey, known as "Hong Kong's first licensed crypto asset stock" (Stock Code: 03887), concluded its IPO subscription on December 12, with its official listing scheduled for December 17. Despite concerns over continued significant financial losses—reporting an adjusted net loss of approximately HK$1.57 billion from 2022 to 2024—the public offering was oversubscribed by 301.6x, raising HK$506 billion in margin financing against an initial target of HK$1.67 billion. The company attributes its losses to high upfront investments in compliance, technology development, and ecosystem expansion, drawing parallels to Coinbase’s early growth trajectory. HashKey operates multiple business segments, including regulated exchange services (HashKey Exchange and HashKey Global), blockchain infrastructure (HashKey Chain), asset management (HashKey Capital), OTC services, and tokenization solutions. Its strategic value lies in being a bridge between traditional finance and Web3, positioning itself as a compliant gateway for institutional entry into Asian crypto markets. With backing from cornerstone investors like UBS, Fidelity, and CDH Investments, HashKey aims to strengthen Hong Kong’s ambition to become a "global virtual asset hub." While skeptics point to its financials and perceived inefficiencies, investor enthusiasm reflects confidence in HashKey’s regulatory compliance, institutional leadership in Asia, and its role in regional digital finance infrastructure. The IPO is seen less as...

Author: momo, ChainCatcher

"Hong Kong's first crypto asset stock" HashKey (stock code: 03887) officially ended its share offering at noon on December 12 and is scheduled to be listed on December 17.

Since passing the Hong Kong Stock Exchange hearing and the public release of its prospectus, the market has shown mixed reactions and voices regarding HashKey's IPO.

On one hand, HashKey's continuous huge losses and high-cost operating structure have raised concerns about its financial health, and its platform token HSK has been criticized as inefficient and sacrificing community interests.

On the other hand, the HashKey IPO subscription market has been continuously hot. The latest data at noon on the 12th, when the offering officially ended, showed that the total subscription funds lent through brokerage channels (margin financing) reached HKD 50.6 billion. Based on the public offering fundraising amount of HKD 167 million (approximately HKD 170 million), it was oversubscribed by 301.6 times.

Additionally, HashKey's IPO has introduced 9 well-known cornerstone investors, including UBS, Fidelity Fund, and CDH Investments, who collectively subscribed to approximately HKD 590 million in shares.

Despite constant pessimism, investors are still betting with real money on HashKey's scarcity value as "Hong Kong's major licensed compliant platform." As a slice of Hong Kong's virtual asset market development, HashKey's hot subscription also reflects the market's policy sentiment, namely the continued optimism towards Hong Kong's acceleration in building a "global virtual asset center."

High Investment Period ≠ Poor Management

The business logic that pessimists should understand:High investment period ≠ Poor management.According to the prospectus, from 2022 to 2024, HashKey accumulated an adjusted net loss of approximately HKD 1.57 billion; the loss in 2024 nearly doubled year-on-year to HKD 1.19 billion.

HashKey explained in its prospectus that in 2022, the trading platform was still in its early development stage, contributing limited revenue, and the fair value loss of digital assets also affected the 2022 financial performance. As the trading system, compliance framework, and institutional client access process were gradually improved, the company fully launched its business in 2023. In 2024, revenue from trade facilitation services reached HKD 518 million, compared to a loss of HKD 15 million in 2022, reflecting strong business expansion momentum and the effectiveness of early strategic investments.

Since 2022, HashKey has been in a period of high investment, and continuous losses are not due to poor management. Early continuous losses are actually common in platform-based companies. For example, Amazon had nearly 20 years of losses. When Amazon went public, Bezos stated in his open letter to shareholders that "it's all about the long term."

Furthermore,high investment in compliant financial infrastructure is almost inevitable in the early development stage.. For example, Coinbase, which is strategically similar to HashKey. Coinbase firmly took the compliance path from its establishment in 2012. Since 2013, it has successively obtained money transmission licenses in 46 U.S. states/regions and can operate legally in all 50 states. It is one of the few exchanges that have obtained various state licenses, FinCEN registration, and a New York trust license in the United States, spending huge amounts on compliance every year. Coinbase's investment far exceeded its revenue for many years before going public. Although it accumulated losses of approximately USD 5-6 million before its IPO, it was still accepted by Wall Street.

For large institutions and mainstream users, Coinbase is often the first or even the only choice. In the United States, subject to regulatory restrictions, many traditional funds can only use licensed trading platforms. Coinbase thus gains a natural market share, and the barriers formed by its brand and compliance are difficult for latecomers to quickly and cost-effectively replicate.

For companies like Coinbase and HashKey, extremely high security levels, risk control systems, compliance systems, and custody capabilities are required, and a large amount of fixed costs must be invested in advance.

Where did HashKey's high investment go?

Besides compliance costs, a large portion of HashKey's high investment went into technology and R&D. In 2024, HashKey's R&D expenditure reached HKD 580 million, accounting for 77.2% of its revenue.This includes developing core trading systems, security risk control systems, self-developed blockchain (HashKey Chain), and cutting-edge technologies like RWA (Real World Asset) tokenization.

Specifically, HashKey's service system includes asset custody, OTC services, institutional services, HashKey Chain public chain, RWA issuance and management, etc. Its ecological landscape can be roughly summarized as:

  • Trading layer (HashKey Exchange, HashKey Global): Provides compliant deposit and withdrawal channels for retail and institutions, with cumulative trading volume exceeding HKD 1.3 trillion, attracting institutional funds, and holding a 75% market share in Hong Kong.

  • Chain layer (HashKey Chain): A compliant L2 public chain focused on RWA tokenization and stablecoin issuance, bridging on-chain and off-chain, with the ecological HSK as a governance token providing continuous incentives for the on-chain ecosystem.

  • Asset management layer (HashKey Capital): On one hand, custody services (Custody), with assets under management exceeding HKD 8 billion. This year, it also launched the DAT (Digital Asset Treasury) ecological fund, with an initial fundraising scale of over USD 500 million, focusing on initiating and participating in the ETH and BTC ecosystems.Additionally, HashKey Capital, as a venture capital department, makes early ecological investments, with a portfolio covering over 600 global projects.

Furthermore, HashKey's ecological landscape also includes HashKey OTC, which provides compliant digital asset over-the-counter trading services, Web3 infrastructure provider HashKey Cloud, and tokenization service agency HashKey Tokenisation.

This IPO aims to further improve the "compliant ecological closed loop of Hong Kong's virtual asset market" and provide Asia with a "scarce entry point for compliant crypto asset services."

HashKey's Positioning Value: Based in Hong Kong, Radiating to Asia

HashKey's core value has long surpassed that of a "compliant exchange" itself. It plays a strategic interface role in the next round of financial system upgrades in Hong Kong and even across Asia.

First is its uniqueEast-West channel value. Hong Kong, as a bridge between Eastern and Western financial systems, has a mature regulatory system, international financial infrastructure, and long-formed institutional synergies with the Chinese mainland market. HashKey plays the role of a "bridge between traditional finance and the Web3 world." For international institutions, it is a compliant entry point into the Chinese and Asian markets.

Second is itsleadership in the institutional market. Based on 2024 trading volume, HashKey is the largest regional onshore platform in Asia. Beyond trading business, based on staked assets, HashKey is also the largest on-chain service provider in Asia and the largest digital asset management institution based on assets under management.

Crypto assets are transforming from speculative products into corporate financial tools, a huge directional change globally.

As the "Asian version of Coinbase," in the process of Asian institutions accelerating their move on-chain, HashKey has almost become the only standard solution that can be adopted currently. Hong Kong's licensing system has extremely high thresholds, with all aspects from governance, risk control, custody to anti-money laundering接近 international financial standards. This regulatory intensity directly forms a quasi-monopoly barrier. Against the backdrop of the relatively低迷 Asian crypto entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystem, HashKey has事实上 become the ceiling for Asian institutional business.

As Hong Kong's first crypto stock, HashKey's positioning value has surpassed its business value.

HashKey恰好 stands at the风口 of Hong Kong's building of a "global virtual asset center" and the intersection of China and the West, traditional finance and virtual assets. Asian regulation and capital markets need a Coinbase-level sample. HashKey's listing is a "value pricing" of future Web3 infrastructure by the regional market. HashKey's IPO journey further reflects the grand narrative of how Asia defines its own rules, attracts global capital, and masters development initiative in the new financial era.

Therefore, despite the dismal financial situation in the prospectus, HashKey's IPO can still be oversubscribed by over 200 times,核心 is paying for its positioning value. Some investors even said that for an上市 of era symbol level, whether it breaks issue price or makes money is not that important; participating in the subscription is more like paying a few thousand dollars for the observation cost at a historical node.

Conclusion: During the trough, don't easily唱空 the Asian crypto ecosystem

When examining HashKey's IPO, simply focusing on the loss numbers很容易 overlook the larger structural logic behind it. HashKey is not a short-cycle platform that relies on trading volume for profits but is building Asia's next-generation digital financial foundation in a heavy-asset, slow-variable way.

Its positioning value in Hong Kong and the Asian financial system is far higher than its current business value. This is why, despite constant loss controversies, criticism of its platform token, and overwhelming质疑, HashKey's IPO was still oversubscribed by hundreds of times. Capital is not unable to understand its financial reports but chooses to bet with real money on the era position it occupies. HashKey is standing at this intersection.

Although not perfect, HashKey is still very scarce for the entire Asian crypto ecosystem.

Asia's crypto entrepreneurship and technological innovation ecosystem is in a trough, lacking high-quality, globally competitive fintech infrastructure companies locally. If even a company like HashKey, which is building compliance path, infrastructure, and institutional interfaces, is唱空, then it is essentially唱空 the ceiling of the entire Asian institutional business, which is毫无 beneficial to industry development.

Hong Kong is still "crossing the river by feeling the stones" in the field of virtual assets and Web3. As the龙头 in this experimental field, the market might as well have more patience and less唱衰. Perhaps we are only one step away from the next爆发 window.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the significance of HashKey's IPO being oversubscribed by 300 times?

AThe 300 times oversubscription of HashKey's IPO reflects strong investor confidence in its strategic positioning as a licensed and compliant platform in Hong Kong, as well as optimism about Hong Kong's development as a global virtual asset hub.

QWhy has HashKey been experiencing significant financial losses despite its high IPO demand?

AHashKey's losses are attributed to its high investment phase, including costs related to compliance, technology development, and infrastructure building, which are common for platform-based companies in their early stages, similar to companies like Amazon and Coinbase.

QWhat are the key areas where HashKey has focused its high investments?

AHashKey has invested heavily in compliance costs, technology and R&D, including developing core trading systems, security risk controls, its proprietary blockchain (HashKey Chain), and real-world asset (RWA) tokenization.

QHow does HashKey position itself in the Asian market, and what is its core value proposition?

AHashKey positions itself as a bridge between traditional finance and Web3 in Asia, offering compliant crypto asset services. It serves as a strategic gateway for international institutions entering the Asian market and holds leadership in institutional services in the region.

QWhat is the broader implication of HashKey's IPO for Asia's crypto ecosystem?

AHashKey's IPO represents a milestone in Asia's crypto ecosystem, signaling the region's commitment to building a regulated virtual asset infrastructure. Its success is seen as a vote of confidence in Asia's potential to become a key player in the global digital finance landscape.

Letture associate

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit7 min fa

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit7 min fa

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报11 min fa

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报11 min fa

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbit1 h fa

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbit1 h fa

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

"SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire and Its Heirs" explores the unconventional succession narrative within SK Group, South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, following SK Hynix's dramatic market rise. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts prioritizing the eldest son, ownership, and political marriages, Chairman Choi Tae-won's three children from his first marriage are charting distinct paths. The eldest daughter, Choi Yun-jeong, is considered the most visible candidate. With a background in biology, consulting, and a PhD, she holds executive roles at SK Bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth strategy unit, focusing on biopharma and new businesses. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional chaebol heir. The second daughter, Choi Min-jeong, took a unique route by voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including a tour in the Gulf of Aden. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK Hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup in San Francisco. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting the family to U.S. defense and policy networks. The son, Choi In-geun, who has Type 1 diabetes, followed a more classic preparatory path with a physics degree and a stint at SK E&S but left to join McKinsey's Seoul office. He remains publicly silent and holds no SK shares, defying the traditional "crown prince" archetype. Their paths unfold against the backdrop of their parents' high-profile, contentious divorce and a record-setting asset division lawsuit. The article argues that as SK Hynix becomes a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the conventional rules of chaebol inheritance are changing. The heirs are being groomed not simply to take over, but to navigate a complex global landscape defined by AI, biotech, geopolitics, and policy, forging legitimacy through their own expertise and networks rather than birth order alone.

marsbit1 h fa

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ERA

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Caldera (ERA) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente CalderaERA.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Caldera (ERA)Dopo aver acquistato Caldera (ERA), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Caldera (ERA)Scambia facilmente Caldera (ERA) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

331 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.07.17Aggiornato il 2025.07.17

Come comprare ERA

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ERA ERA sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片